Search

Serratia marcescens can cause a range of severe infections and contributes to nosocomial outbreaks. Although whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based typing is the standard method for molecular surveillance and outbreak investigation, there is no standardized analytic scheme for S. marcescens core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST). Here, the development and evaluation of a S. marcescens cgMLST scheme is reported with the goal of enabling a standardized methodology and typing nomenclature. Four hundred ninety-one high-quality S. marcescens WGS data sets were extracted from public databases and-using the genomic sequence of NCBI reference strain S. marcescens Db11 (NZ_HG326223.1) as a starting point-all Db11 genes present in ≥97% data sets used to create a cgMLST scheme. The novel scheme was evaluated using WGS data from 24 outbreak investigations (in/i= 175 isolates) distributed over three continents. Analysis of Db11 genes within the 491 data sets identified 2,692 target genes present in ≥97% of genomes (mean, 99.1%; median, 99.9%). These genes formed the novel cgMLST scheme, covering 47.8% of nucleotides in the Db11 genome. Analyzing 175 isolates from 24 outbreaks using the novel scheme gave comparable results to previous typing efforts for both general groupings and allelic distances within clusters. In summary, a novel cgMLST scheme for S. marcescens was developed and evaluated. The scheme and its associated nomenclature will improve standardization of typing efforts for molecular surveillance and outbreak investigation, allowing better understanding of S. marcescens genomic epidemiology and facilitating interlaboratory comparisons.

Various Gram staining automated systems are available to accelerate and standardize the staining process, but a systematic comparison of different systems is largely lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate two devices in comparison to manual Gram staining. Clinical samples (n = 500; University Hospital Munster, Germany; May to June 2020) were simultaneously Gram stained manually and with two automated Gram stainers (Previ Color Gram, bioMerieux, and ColorAX2, Axonlab). The quality was assessed based on four criteria: (i) homogeneous staining of bacteria/fungi, (ii) uniform staining of the background, (iii) absence of staining artifacts, and (iv) congruency between culture and microscopy. Each criterion was rated with 0 (absence) or 1 (presence) point to calculate a quality score (0 to 4 points). The costs for each staining procedure were calculated based on consumables and hands-on time (applying the average wage of a laboratory technician in the public service for Germany and the United States). The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) quality scores were comparable for manual staining (3.06 ± 0.91) and Previ Color Gram (3.04 ± 0.90; P = 0.6), while significantly lower scores were achieved by ColorAX2 (2.57 ± 1.09; P < 0.0001). The total cost per Gram stain was €1.13/$1.34 for Previ Color Gram, €0.80/$0.83 for manual, and €0.60/$0.71 for ColorAX2, respectively. The quality and costs per slide vary significantly between instruments of different manufacturers.

On 7 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced a novel coronavirus to be the cause of pneumonia cases whose cause was unclear in China. The infection came to be known as a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). After