Search

Aims and objectives To inquire into the reasons for family involvement in adult patients' surgical decision-making processes from the point of view of the patients' family. Background Making a patient the centre of medical decision-making is essential for respecting individual's autonomy. However, in a Chinese society, family members are often deeply involved in a patient's medical decision-making. Although family involvement has long been viewed as an aspect of the Chinese culture, empirical evidence of the reasons for family involvement in medical decision-making has been lacking. Design A qualitative study. Method In order to record and examine reasons for family involvement in adult patients' surgical decision-making, 12 different family members of 12 elective surgery patients were interviewed for collecting and analysing data. Results Three major reasons for family involvement emerged from the data analyses: (1) to share responsibility; (2) to ensure the correctness of medical information; and (3) to safeguard the patient's well-being. These findings also reveal that culture is not the only reason for family involvement. Conclusions Making decision to undergo a surgery is a tough and stressful process for a patient. Family may provide the patient with timely psychological support to assist the patient to communicate with his or her physician(s) and other medical personnel to ensure their rights. It is also found that due to the imbalanced doctor-patient power relationship, a patient may be unable, unwilling to, or even dare not, tell the whole truth about his or her illness or feelings to the medical personnel. Thus, a patient would expect his or her family to undertake such a mission during the informed consent and decision-making processes. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study may provide medical professionals with relevant insights into family involvement in adult patients' surgical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To explore the incidence, associated factors and adverse outcomes for initial inappropriate use of urinary catheters in hospitalised older patients. Background Urinary catheters can lead to substantial complications. The related factors and adverse outcomes associated with initial inappropriate urinary catheter use among hospitalised older patients have not been studied. Design Prospective cohort study. Methods A total of 321 older patients admitted to the hospital in southern Taiwan having urinary catheters placed within 24 hours of admission were recruited. Demographic factors, voiding function history, health conditions and care conditions of catheter placement were collected through a review of medical records, interviewing participants or their primary caregivers. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection during hospitalisation, transfer to a nursing home, length of hospital stay and change in activities of daily living determined as outcomes. Criteria for urinary catheter placement were developed to identify inappropriate use. Results The incidence of initial inappropriate use of urinary catheters among hospitalised Taiwanese older patients was 38·3%. The rationale most often reported for initial inappropriate use was 'convenience of care' (49·6%). Factors associated with initial inappropriate use were, chronic constipation, urinary tract infection history, medical treatment diagnosis, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and independence in activities of daily living and, insertion of catheter during evening and night shifts and lack of nursing documentation of the rationale for catheterisation. Patients with initial inappropriate use showed greater decline in activities of daily living function between admission and discharge. Conclusion Older patients with greater care needs may become the victims of initial inappropriate use of urinary catheters. Inappropriate use may devastate the activities of daily living in older patients. Nurses' awareness of indications for urinary catheters may prevent inappropriate use. Relevance to clinical practice A policy to strengthen nurses' awareness of the use of urinary catheters is needed in Taiwan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives This study presents a discussion of the physiological and psychological efficacy of a self-regulation protocol in lowering acute exacerbation symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Background Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are often troubled by acute exacerbation and must learn how to prevent this. Design A two-group, pretest-post-test experimental design was used in this study. Methods Data were collected between January- July 2008. Sixty-four participants were randomly assigned either to an intervention ( n = 33) or to a comparison ( n = 31) group. Both groups were assessed on four separate occasions, namely pretest, post-test 1 (5th week), post-test 2 (9th week) and post-test 3 (13th week). The intervention group received a four-week self-regulation protocol. The comparison group received the self-regulation guidebook only. The Borg Dyspnea Scale, the Symptom Distress Scale, the Pulmonary Functional Status Scale, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Self-Efficacy Scale and the peak expiratory flow were used to measure differences between pretest and post-test values. Results On the 5th, 9th and 13th weeks after the self-regulation protocol intervention, we found significantly better scores in the four scales in the intervention group compared to those in the comparison group. On the 9th and 13th weeks, there was a significantly greater peak expiratory flow in the intervention group. The intervention group also showed a lower rate of unscheduled physician visits because of acute exacerbation than the comparison group. Conclusion The findings indicate that the self-regulation protocol developed in this study could significantly assist participants to control their individual symptoms and avoid acute exacerbation. Relevance to clinical practice Healthcare professionals could apply the protocol developed in this study to assist patients to learn the strategies of self-regulation to prevent their acute exacerbation symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To delineate the trajectories of functional status over four time points and to examine predictors of functional decline ( FD) in hospitalised older patients. Background About 30-60% of the older patients develop new dependence in activities of daily living ( ADL) during a hospital stay, which results in progressive disability after discharge. The functional trajectories and risk factors of FD among hospitalised older patients require identification. Design A cohort study. Methods The study consecutively recruited 273 patients aged 65 and older admitted to a medical centre in southern Taiwan. Functional trajectory, by ADL score, was observed at four time points: two weeks before admission, admission, discharge and three months after discharge. The ADL score two weeks before admission was used as a baseline functional status. Results Eighty-three (30·4%) patients experienced FD at three months after discharge. Functional trajectory as shown by ADL scores indicated that all 273 patients dropped steeply at admission and that two-thirds were gradually restored three months after discharge. Logistic regression revealed that the number of falls in the past year, Instrument Activities of Daily Living (IADL) status before admission, comorbidity and ADL decline between preadmission and discharge were significant predictors of FD three months after discharge. The ADL score decline during hospitalisation was the mediator of FD three months after discharge. Conclusions Findings indicate that the ADL function of those hospitalised older patients who reported having fallen more often in the previous year had more comorbidity, had a lower IADL score, and had more ADL score decline before admission and discharge would continue to decline after discharge. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical nurses can integrate the finding of this study with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment to tailor intervention to restore older patient's physical function during hospitalisation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives. This study aimed to explore patient perception of the meaning of family involvement in elective surgery decision making in Taiwan. Background. Informed consent is based on respecting patient autonomy. However in cultures where family plays a key role in medical decision making, a patient's perspective of family involvement has not been fully investigated. Design and methods. Based on a phenomenological approach, this study conducted semistructured interviews to elicit the experiences of 10 elective surgery patients in southern Taiwan who had family present during their surgery decision making. An adapted version of Colaizzi's (1978) method was used to analyse narratives. Results. Three themes emerged from the elective surgery patients' perception of the meaning of family involvement in their surgery decision-making process: (1) Primacy of family well-being, (2) family as information broker, and (3) family as patient advocate. Patients articulated reciprocal relationships amongst family members, and they expressed overall family well-being as their ultimate concern when making their treatment decision. The essence of the elective surgery patients' perception of the meaning of family involvement in decision making was 'family as a whole'. Conclusions. Patients' concern for overall family well-being and their perspective that family plays a supportive role in transmitting information and acting as patient advocate during the decision-making process may both enhance and restrict individual patient autonomy. In cultures where family is central in decision making, appropriately involving the family in medical decisions should not be overlooked. Relevance to clinical practice. Understanding and acknowledging the important roles of family in medical decision making from the patients' perspective can enable health professionals to more effectively communicate with patients and their family. Then, health professionals can empower the individual who is making the medical decision based on his or her own needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives. This study examined health promotion behaviours of kidney transplant recipients, 1-5 years after transplant and identified the risk factors predicting non-adherence to post-transplant recommendations. Background. Non-adherence to health care recommendations and health promotion behaviours is one of the top three reasons for graft loss following kidney transplantation. Design. A cross-sectional study. Methods. Kidney transplant recipients ( n = 101) in southern Taiwan completed a self reported survey, the Kidney Transplant Health Promotion Behavior and Healthcare Provider Support survey. Results. Kidney transplant patients had better adherence with medication and least adherence with regular exercise health promotion behaviours. Age, post kidney transplant time, health care provider support and financial satisfaction accounted for 37·2% of the explained variance in monitoring and management for rejection and infection. Marital status, post kidney transplant time and gender accounted for 16·2% of the explained variance in infection prevention. Age was the sole predictor of exercise (odds ratio = 1·08, p = 0·025). Health promotion behaviours declined with time and perceived healthcare provider support decreased at the third ( p = 0·04) post kidney transplant year. Conclusion. In this study, young, single, males were identified as requiring specific strategies to improve post kidney transplant health promotion behaviours. The need for health promotion must be continually reinforce by healthcare providers throughout the lifespan of a kidney transplant recipient. Relevance to clinical practice. Understanding the changes of health behaviours of post kidney transplant recipients and their risk factors, healthcare providers can be more aware of the needs of patients in maintaining health promotion behaviours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]