Search

PURPOSE The risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy–related GI adverse events in patients with cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been well described. We characterized GI adverse events in patients with underlying IBD who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with documented IBD who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy between January 2010 and February 2019. Backward selection and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to assess risk of GI adverse events. RESULTS Of the 102 included patients, 17 received therapy targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and 85 received monotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 or its ligand. Half of the patients had Crohn’s disease, and half had ulcerative colitis. The median time from last active IBD episode to immunotherapy initiation was 5 years (interquartile range, 3-12 years). Forty-three patients were not receiving treatment of IBD. GI adverse events occurred in 42 patients (41%) after a median of 62 days (interquartile range, 33-123 days), a rate higher than that among similar patients without underlying IBD who were treated at centers participating in the study (11%; P < .001). GI events among patients with IBD included grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in 21 patients (21%). Four patients experienced colonic perforation, 2 of whom required surgery. No GI adverse event–related deaths were recorded. Anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 therapy was associated with increased risk of GI adverse events on univariable but not multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.8 to 9.48; P = .037; and odds ratio, 4.72; 95% CI, 0.95 to 23.53; P = .058, respectively). CONCLUSION Preexisting IBD increases the risk of severe GI adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

e15074 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that may require multidisciplinary input. We developed an IR-Tox program consisting of an electronic irAE referral platform +/- in-person consultation, and a monthly irAE tumor board, run by an IR-Tox team comprising 38 organ-specialists and oncologists. Herein, we present our 2-year experience. Methods: Electronic referrals for patients (pts) treated with ICIs at an academic center were sent to the IR-Tox team between 08/2017-12/2019. Demographic, treatment, and irAE data, including in-person consultations and hospitalizations, were collected in an IRB-approved database. Results: The IR-Tox Team received 270 referrals from 227 discrete pts (outpt: 64% inpt: 36%). Median age was 63 years (range: 3-91), 52% were male, 23% had a prior autoimmune condition, and 28% had a prior irAE. Pts had thoracic (30%), gastrointestinal (18%) or melanoma/skin cancers (17%). The majority of pts received ICI monotherapy (56%) vs. combination (44%). Referrals were for suspected irAE (92%, 209/227) or pre-ICI assessment for known autoimmune disease (8%, 18/227). Referrals for confirmed irAEs (147/209) were mainly for high-grade toxicity (G1 = 8%, 2 = 37%, 3 = 54%), 49% were hospitalized (72/147), and 86% (127/147) improved/resolved. In those who did not have a confirmed irAE (n = 62), an alternative medical condition was the most frequent diagnosis (27%, 17/62). The most common irAEs were pneumonitis (51%), dermatitis (11%), arthritis (7%), hepatitis (6%), and colitis (5%). In the entire cohort, organ-specialists were consulted electronically in 92% of pts (209/227), and 73% were subsequently seen in-person (166/227), with the majority (90/166; 54%) undergoing an invasive diagnostic procedure to confirm the irAE. Of outpatients referred, 64% (94/146) required subsequent in-person consults from organ-specialists and only 12% (18/146) were hospitalized. After all irAE-hospitalizations, continued irAE management was delivered in conjunction with organ-specialists in 51% of cases (32/72). Conclusions: A multidisciplinary IR-Tox program is a utilized service that has assisted in irAE identification and management over 2+ years. Use of an electronic referral platform may impact subsequent need for in-person specialist consultations and/or hospitalizations for irAEs. Ongoing management of complex irAEs is now commonly delivered in a multidisciplinary fashion.

138 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are anti-cancer agents now in routine clinical practice, and may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The proportion of inpatient admissions for irAEs, spectrum of toxicities, management and outcomes are not well described. Methods: Patients with solid tumors admitted to the inpatient oncology service at a tertiary academic center over 3 months, were identified. Patient demographics, treatment details, irAE event and management data, were collected for those who received ICIs, in an IRB-approved database. The diagnosis of irAEs was confirmed by the treating physician and oncologist. Associations between clinical details and irAEs were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Results: We identified 240 inpatient oncology patients: 53 (22.1%) had received ICIs, and 25% (13/53) were admitted for irAEs. The majority of irAEs requiring admission were high grade (CTCAE grade 1-2: 6/13, 46%; grade 3+: 7/13, 54%), and included: colitis (31%), pneumonitis (23%), skin rash (8%), fever (8%), pancreatitis (8%), fatigue (8%), and renal transplant rejection (8%). Treatment for irAEs included: ICI withhold (2/13, 15%), oral/IV corticosteroids (10/13, 76%), and infliximab (1/13, 8%); with 85% of patients requiring subspecialty consultations. Those with irAEs had a shorter median length of stay vs. other inpatients (5 vs. 6 days). Most irAEs resolved/improved (11/13, 85%), while 15% worsened (1/13) or resulted in patient death (1/13). There was a numerically higher risk of any/grade3+ irAEs for those: treated with combination vs monotherapy (33% vs 23%; 100% vs 40%), age > 65 vs < 65 (33% vs 15%; 56% vs 50%), and former/current vs. never smokers (31% vs 19%; 63% vs 40%), however differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Patients with irAEs constitute a notable proportion of inpatient oncology admissions, with a higher incidence than in reported clinical trials. Initial data suggest that patients treated with combination ICIs, aged > 65, and former/current smokers may be more likely to be admitted for irAEs. The majority of irAE admissions require subspecialty consultations, signifying a growing need for multidisciplinary irAE management.