Search

PURPOSE Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974 ). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor–positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19–specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

180 Background: Cabazitaxel and Lu-PSMA both improved survival in patients with mCRPC after docetaxel and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), but there is limited data regarding Lu-PSMA activity after cabazitaxel. We aimed at assessing activity of Lu-PSMA and determinants of outcomes in this setting. Methods: Consecutive mCRPC patients from 6 European centers treated with Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel were included in this retrospective study. Endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to PSA progression (PSA-TTP), PSA decline, objective response, overall survival, and safety. Results: Of 101 patients included (median age 67y), 64% had ISUP grade 4-5 disease; 71% had bone +/- nodal (LN) metastases, 22% visceral metastases, 7% LN only. All patients and 92% had received previous docetaxel and a prior ARPI (≥ 2 in 47%) before cabazitaxel respectively. Patients had received a median number of 6 cabazitaxel cycles (range 1-26). DNA damage repair alterations (DDR) were found in 11/48 (23%) patients with available testing. Patients received a median number of 3 Lu-PSMA cycles (range 1-14). With a median follow-up of 5.7 months, the median rPFS from Lu-PSMA initiation was 4.3 months (m, 95%CI 3.2-5.7) and median PSA-TTP was 3.5 m (95%CI 3.0-4.5). Overall, 44 patients (44%) experienced a PSA decline ≥ 50% (PSA50), 54 (53%) ≥ 30% (PSA30), and 67 (66%) any PSA decline. Objective response rate was 34%. Baseline characteristics associated with shorter rPFS on Lu-PSMA included ISUP grade 4-5 disease (median rPFS of 3.5 vs. 7.2m, p=0.02) and a time to castration resistance < 12 months (3.1m vs. 4.5m, p=0.04). Patients with LN only had longer rPFS compared to those with bone and visceral metastases (median NR vs. 3.6 and 3.7m, respectively, p=0.02). There was no association between activity of Lu-PSMA and DNA damage repair alterations, duration of previous cabazitaxel therapy, and number of previous ARPI. During Lu-PSMA, a profound PSA decline was associated with longer rPFS: patients achieving PSA50, PSA30 or any PSA decline had respective median rPFS rates of 9.0, 8.3 and 6.2 months, while those who did not experience any PSA decline had a median rPFS of only 2.6 months. Conclusions: Lu-PSMA demonstrated substantial PSA decline but limited duration of response after cabazitaxel in a real-life setting. Adverse baseline characteristics and absence of PSA decline may help early identification of poor responders.

752 Background: Glucose and other metabolites (lactates and glutamine) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may alter the activity of the immune system cells. Cancer cells consume glucose and its decrease in the TME affects the function of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Moreover, tumor-infiltrated immunosuppressive cells and vascular endothelial cells also deplete nutrients, in the TME, enhancing an immunosuppressive environment. On the basis of the results coming from our previous works regarding lymphocytes to monocytes ratio (LMr) and diabetes, suggesting a role for each of them as predictors of better outcomes, in this study we evaluate both of them in order to establish a possible role of them as outcomes predictive factors. Methods: Data from 228 patients (pts) were collected retrospectively from 2016 to 2021: 175 from the Medical Oncology Unit of University Hospital of Cagliari; 53 from the Medical Oncology Unit, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona. All pts had stage IV disease and received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel 1st line chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc package. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between treated DM2 and lymphocytes to monocytes ratio (LMr) ≥ 4 with outcomes. Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was performed taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, LMr, NLr, LDH, Ca19.9, and metastatic sites. Results: Median age was 68 (±9), 123/228 (54%) were male, 94/232 (40,6%) were affected by DM2 (insulin or metfomin-treated) and 138 (59,4%) pts were not affected by DM2. 52/228 (23%) pts had a LMr ≥ 4, 176/228 (77%) pts had a LMr < 4. In multivariate analysis, DM2 and LM ratio ≥ 4 were found to be independent factors associated with higher overall survival. Therefore, we divided the pts into 3 groups: co-presence DM2 and LM ≥ 4 (DM+LM+); absence of DM2 and LM ≥ 4 (DM-LM-); presence of DM2 or LM ≥ 4 (DM+LM- or DM-LM+). DM+LM+ demonstrated statistically significantly higher median OS than DM+LM-/DM-LM+ and DM-LM- (not reached versus 21 versus 9 months, respectively, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, DM+LM+ showed a statistically significant better median PFS than DM+LM-/DM-LM+ and DM-LM- (11 versus 9 versus 6 months, respectively, p = 0,0036). Conclusions: Results showed a correlation between pts with DM2/LMr ≥ 4 and better outcomes. This may suggest the presence of a link between glucose metabolism and lymphocytes activation. Antidiabetic medications could promote the inhibition of Warburg effect in tumor cells, and, consequently, provide a better glucose intake to extracellular microenvironment, and immune cells, including T lymphocytes. This process leads to a higher activity of T-cells and a better treatment response. Further studies are warranted.

4153 Background: Despite the most recent therapeutic achievements, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognosis and response to treatments. Among the most investigated prognostic biomarkers, the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMr) is gaining increasing interest in literature, mostly in hematological malignancies, breast cancer, bladder cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In these settings, a higher LMr allows identifying a subset of patients with a better prognosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the role of the LMr as a prognostic factor in patients affected by metastatic PDAC and to find a cut-off value able to identify a subset of patients with better prognosis and possibly susceptible to other therapeutic options. Methods: Data from 228 patients were collected retrospectively from 2014 to 2021. 175 from the Department of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital of Cagliari and 53 from the Oncology Clinic - University Hospital of Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona. All patients had metastatic PDAC and blood samples were collected before starting first-line chemotherapy. The cut-off value for LMr was calculated according to the ROC curves at 6, 12, and 18 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were then obtained for the evaluation of survivals. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed, taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, NL ratio, metastatic sites, Ca19.9 and LDH. Results: The median age was 68 y.o. (range 39-84 y.o.), 123 (54%) were males. Cut off value obtained for LMR, was 4. 156 (68,4%) patients had an LMr < 4 and 72 (31,6%) patients had an LMR ≥ 4. Patients with a ratio ≥ 4 showed a statistically significant difference in terms of median overall survival compared to patients with a ratio < 4 (23 months versus 11 months, p < 0.0001). First-line median progression-free survival was also different in patients with a value greater than or equal to 4 (11 months versus 6 months, p = 0.005), suggesting a better treatment response in the first group of patients. Finally, multivariate analysis showed that LMR ≥ 4 is an independent prognostic factor for OS ( p = 0.0005). Conclusions: The results of our study show that the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio could be an important prognostic factor in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, although the limitations of a retrospective study should be considered. Furthermore, these findings suggest the active role of the immune response in limiting disease progression, indicating a group of patients who could benefit most from a target or combined immunotherapy treatment.

e16301 Background: The association between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has long been evaluated. Indeed, DM2 can be both an epiphenomenon of PDAC and a risk factor. However, the data on the influence of DM2 and concomitant drug therapy in the progression of pancreatic neoplasms are conflicting. The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between overall survival (OS) and antidiabetic drugs in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and DM2. Methods: Data from 232 patients were collected retrospectively from 2014 to 2021. 174 from the Department of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital of Cagliari and 58 from the Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona. All patients had stage IV disease and received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel first-line chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc package. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between DM2, anti-diabetic medications (ADMs) and median overall survival (mOS). Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed, taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, LDH, Ca19.9, and metastatic sites. Results: The median age was 69 y.o. (range 40-84 y.o.), 127 (54,7%) were male. All patients received first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. 138 (59,4%) patients were not affected by DM2, 94/232 (40,6%) were affected by DM2. Among DM2 patients, 57 (%) were insulin-treated and 37 (%) were metformin-treated. DM2 patients showed a statistically significant higher median overall survival (26 versus 11 months, 95% CI, p = 0,0002). Furthermore, among DM2 patients insulin-treated and metformin-treated showed a mOS of 21 months and 33 months, respectively (95% CI, p = 0.0002). Finally, multivariate analysis showed that treated-DM2 is an independent prognostic factor ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: The results of our study showed a correlation between DM2 on treatment (with insulin or metformin) and higher mOSin patients with metastatic PDAC. However, the limitations due to retrospective data collection must be considered. The mechanisms underlying these findings could be explained by maintaining optimal insulin concentration and good glycemic control during treatments, or by the activity of anti-diabetic medication in neoplastic tissues. However, further studies in this setting are needed.

2595 Background: Healthcare costs and need of frequent patients' (pts) access to oncology departments led to an increasing interest in alternative immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) administration schedules able to offer longer dose intervals. The extended interval dosing (ED) of nivolumab and pembrolizumab was approved based on pharmacokinetic data, the relationship of exposure to efficacy, and the relationship of exposure to safety. We aimed to investigate real-life immune-related adverse events (irAEs) incidence in pts treated with ED-ICIs. Methods: Clinicopathological and treatment characteristics of all consecutive solid cancer pts treated with ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) monotherapy who received at least one cycle of the ED (pembrolizumab 400 every 6 weeks or nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks) were identified from patient electronic records of 37 oncology departments across Europe and entered into a prospectively maintained database. Results: Among 756 pts enrolled in the EDICI study, 733 pts (229 treated with pembrolizumab, and 504 with nivolumab) were included in the final safety analysis (median follow up time: 24.7 months). 476 pts were males, with melanoma (441, 60%) and non-small cell lung cancer (151, 20%) being the prevalent tumor types. Median age was 67 years old, and 589 (80%) pts received ICIs in the advanced setting. 501 (68%) of the enrolled pts started ICIs with canonical interval dosing (CD, median number of cycles administered: 13) and subsequently switched to ED after a median time interval of 210 days. During CD-ICI, 197 pts (39%) developed irAEs of any grade and 14 patients (3%) G3/G4 events; after switching to ED-ICI treatment, which was administered for a median of 7 cycles and 336 days, irAEs of any grade and G3/G4 events were experienced by 155 (36%) and 20 (5%) pts, respectively; 73 (47%) cases of any grade-toxicity and 12 (60%) of G3/G4-toxicity were de novo. 33 (7%) pts switched back to CD, in 45% of the cases due to toxicity. Pts who started upfront with ED (n = 232, 32%) were exposed to the drug for a median of 7 cycles; 56 of them (25%) developed irAEs of any grade and 9 (6%) G3/G4 irAEs. Skin (12% of patients), endocrine (11%), rheumatic (10%) and gastrointestinal (9%) were the most common irAEs during ED; 42% were “multiple-site” irAEs, showing no difference with CD (p = 0.21). Lower creatinine values before switch to ED (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95%CI, 1.03-1.48; P = 0.02) and previous toxicity during CD (aOR, 1.20; 95%CI, 1.08-1.33; P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for development of irAEs during ED. Conclusions: Despite similar exposure time, the safety profile of ED treatment did not differ from CD, confirming that ED-ICI administration is a safe and feasible option also in cancer pts outside of clinical trials. Future investigations are needed to explore efficacy data and economic impact of this strategy.

544 Background: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) have a 5-year survival of 2.7%. Studies have shown that patients with mPC receive aggressive end of life (EOL) care which has been associated with worse quality of life for patients and high use of resources when they are least likely to benefit patients. Methods: A retrospective database of patients with mPC treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019 was analyzed for utilization of palliative care and EOL care. Statistical analysis was performed using one-sample Z tests calculated in Excel. Results: We identified 610 patients with mPC, of whom 39% received palliative care, 56% were referred to hospice, and 91.8% are deceased. The average time from mPC diagnosis to palliative care consult was 232 days, the average time from palliative care consult to death was 121 days. Patients who received palliative care were less likely to receive chemotherapy within 14 days of death (7.7% vs 13.3%, p =0.05), more likely to have a DNR code status (83.3% vs 44.5%, p < 0.0001), and more likely to be referred to hospice (83.9% vs 35.9%, p < 0.0001). The average length of time on hospice was 24 days with no difference between those who received palliative care and those who did not. Patients who were referred to hospice were also less likely to receive chemotherapy within 14 days of death (6.7% vs 19.8%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with mPC who had a palliative care team involved in their care were significantly less likely to receive aggressive EOL care.

e13072 Background: Bone Metastases (BM) are still the main cause of morbidity and morbility in cancer patients because of their complications defined as skeletal-related events (SREs).SREs reduce pts quality of life and are associated with an increasing in social and health costs. At present, data concerning BM are mainly obtained retrospectively from monocentric experiences. Methods: We performed a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with BM from breast cancer (BC) with at least 6 month (m)'s follow-up who were registered in a prospective BM database (BMDB). Detailed information on patients at first diagnosis of BM was recorded in a custom-built software system, updated every 6 m by participating centres and reviewed by the coordinator centre.All pts have signed an informed consent. Results: Since October 2014,618 pts with BM from solid tumors were enrolled of whom 220 have BC as primitive site with a 6 m follow-up. Median age was 62 y (range 26-86). Median Follow up was 34 m (6-149). At enrolment 109 (50%) had only BM and 109 (50%) pts had concomitant visceral and BM. Median time to first BM was 47 m (range 0-312) in Bone only disease and 78.6 m in pts with visceral bone metastases. Disease Free interval (DFI) was different according to BC molecular subtypes and stage. The univariate hazard ratio (HR) for visceral or bone metastasis was higher in luminal B tumors (1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1-2.3) (p = 0.002), basal-like (2.50, 95% CI:1.1-6.0) (p = 0.043), and HER2-enriched tumors (1.37, 95% CI:0.78-2.4) (p = 0.273). DFI for pts with stage I disease at diagnosis of primary BC was longer than that for stage III pts (median 67.2 m, 95%CI:53.1-96.1, vs. 58.1 m, 95%CI:41.9-73.4), with a HR of 1.84 (95% CI:1.1-3.0) (p = 0.015) for the stage III group, and 0.98 (95% C.I.:0.6-1.5) (p = 0.930) for the stage II group. During BM disease, 98 pts had at least 1 SREs . Zoledronate was used in 69.1% and Denosumab in 28.3% of cases. First line treatment was hormone-based (n = 105, 50.7%) chemo-based therapy (n = 80, 38.7%) and chemo+ormono based (n = 20, 9.7%). During follow up progression disease occurred in 167 pts. Median progression-free (mPFS) and overall survival calculated from metastatic disease diagnosis (mOS) were 15.1 m (95%CI 12.6-18.4) and 66.8 m (95%CI 52.1-79.2),respectively. Conclusions: This study presents prospective data about a cohort of BC pts enrolled at the first BM occurrence and followed over the time, extrapolated by the multicentric observational BMDB in order to better understed the clinical history of breast cancer and bone metastases.

3074 Background: After progression to standard chemotherapy, only a small proportion of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) benefit from anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) treatment. Combination strategies might improve response. In pre-clinical models, statins showed vaccine adjuvant activities and synergized with anti-PD1 agents. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the impact of baseline statin treatment in MPM and NSCLC pts. Methods: We separately examined MPM and NSCLC pts treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy after progression to standard chemotherapy at two European academic institutions. As control cohort, MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy were also examined. Pts receiving statins at start of treatment were compared with those who did not. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 287 patients were examined. Twenty-seven out of 80 (34%) MPM and 36 out of 130 (20%) NSCLC pts received statins at start of anti-PD1 treatment. The most common statins were simvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. In MPM pts, statin use was associated with improved ORR (22% versus 5%, P = 0.05), longer PFS (median 6.7 versus 2.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23–0.77, P < 0.01), and longer OS (median not reached versus 6.0 months, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.85, P = 0.01). In NSCLC pts, statin use was associated with improved ORR (40% versus 22%, P = 0.04), longer PFS (median 7.8 versus 3.6 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.97.2, P = 0.03) but similar OS (median 13.1 versus 10.1 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49–1.28, P = 0.30). At multivariate analyses, after adjusting for ECOG performance status (PS) and histological subtype, the impact of statins remained significant for ORR, PFS and OS in MPM and for PFS in NSCLC. Conversely, no association between statin use and outcomes was found in 77 MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study shows that statin use at start of anti-PD1 treatment improves response to anti-PD1 agents in MPM and NSCLC pts who progressed to standard chemotherapy in routine clinical practice. This association could not be found in MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy, thus suggesting a synergy between statins and anti-PD1 agents. Prospective studies are needed to confirm whether the combination of statin and anti-PD1 therapy could improve outcome in pts with poorly immunogenic thoracic malignancies.

e19231 Background: Nowadays, in the “era of technology”, websites, online journals and social media give access to an extraordinary amount of medical information; moreover, many patients and their families employ websites and social media searching for additional clarifications about their own malignancies and the prescribed treatments. Misleading news are often disseminated generating false expectations, exaggerated anxiety and confusion even on officially supported websites. In oncology setting, disinformation is perhaps more deleterious than in other fields, with a considerable impact on single patients as well as on families and, more in general, on Public Health. In order to promote the best interaction between the world of health and the world of communication, a table of experts was established with the aim to draft a shared document identifying strategies to overcome barriers between communication and health care as well as to propose common criteria for an effective dissemination of medical information. Methods: On the basis of the "consensus conference" method in the RAND/UCLA variant, a modified version of Delphi methodology, a literature research has been conducted with the aim to select studies related to the best practices applied to health journalism regarding oncology setting. Results: Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, from which 72 recommendations were extracted and submitted to experts in communication and health professionals included in the technical table. After the evaluation of this panel, 57 recommendations scored more than 7 representing the selected statements shared together by communication experts and health professionals. This consensus and the drawn up shared document represent a concrete attempt to found a renewed and strategic alliance between health and communication operators in order to produce useful and reproducible indications for an effective dissemination of medical information. Conclusions: As the “American Declaration of Independence”, our “Declaration of Good Communication” has identified high-impact recommendations for the best management of patients, providing simple but fundamental concepts and recommendations about effective communication especially in oncology setting.

e24051 Background: CSOC conducts quality improvements (QI) for cancer patients that facilitate delivery of appropriate health maintenance and supportive cancer care at diagnosis and during treatment. CSOC is implementing a care planning QI starting at diagnosis using the 4R oncology model (Right Info / Care / Patient / Time), which provides patients a formal personalized care plan called Patient Care Sequence. Each Care Sequence includes health maintenance, cancer treatments and supportive care. As part of CSOC, we conducted provider surveys as a pre-intervention baseline to inform QI opportunities. Methods: Online survey of cancer providers from 8 cancer centers (4 academic, 4 community) conducted July 2018 - October 2019, prior to 4R implementation. The survey focused on current care planning practices and inclusion of guideline recommended health maintenance in care plans. Results: Survey response rate: 80% (180/225); respondents were 53% physicians, 20% advanced practice, 27% nurses. Only 59% (107/180) of respondents give patients care plans at diagnosis: 61% (65/107) verbally, 22% (24/107) written, 17% (18/107) using a printed form. Providers reported considerable gaps in including guideline-based health maintenance and promotion activities in care plans given to patients (Table). Additionally, 61% of providers reported concerns that it is challenging for their patients to manage their own health maintenance activities. Providers who are concerned about patients’ challenges in managing their own health maintenance are significantly more likely to give their patients a written or printed plan (76%, 32/42) compared to those providing care plans to patients verbally or not at all (56%, 77/138), p = .02. Conclusions: Guideline based health promotion activities are not consistently included in care plans, and care planning is not sufficiently conducted at cancer diagnosis. The CSOC 4R Oncology Model, which implements Patient Care Sequences at diagnosis, will address these gaps and examine the impact of formal care planning on improving utilization of health maintenance and promotion activities. [Table: see text]

TPS4666 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized Phase 2b study inpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment(NCT02195180). Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this Phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory Phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (N = ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/Abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; stage III-IV disease; documented evidence of disease progression; available tumor tissue; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A hazard ratio in OS of 0.725 is being targeted which represents a conservative estimate based on the Phase 2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC is established to review safety at regular intervals andto review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. IDMC last reviewed the trial in October 2019 and suggested the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441 .

199 Background: The Commission on Cancer (CoC) Standard 3.2 requires distress screening and indicated action for cancer patients. NCCN and ASCO supportive care and age-related guidelines include patient reported concerns beyond distress. This study compares PHQ4 scores to other patient reported concerns. Methods: The Coleman Supportive Oncology Collaborative aggregated “best of” screening tools to assess patient reported needs and concerns aligned with CoC, NCCN and ASCO guidance. This supportive care screening tool was implemented at 8 sites from July 2015 thru July 2018. Analysis used chi squared test. Results: Most patients, 86% (10,635/12,295), reported one plus concerns and/or above threshold scores on PHQ4, PROMIS Pain, Fatigue or Physical Function. A chi squared comparison of patients with at least mild distress on PHQ4 to patients with no distress resulted in p values < .0001 for every screening category. Conclusions: Patients with a PHQ4 distress score of mild, moderate or severe also reported statistically significant levels of practical, family, physical, nutrition and treatment concerns. These patients also scored threshold levels for PROMIS Pain, Fatigue, and Physical Function. Screening only for distress without screening for other patient concerns may direct patients to services that do not address or focus on the underlying cause of the distress. [Table: see text]

TPS4151 Background: Platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimens are the backbone of first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The optimal duration of first-line therapy is still unknown and its continuation until disease progression represents the standard. However this strategy is often associated with cumulative toxicity and rapid development of drug resistance. Moreover, only 40% of AGC pts are eligible for second-line treatment. This study aims at assessing whether switch maintenance to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel will extend the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects with HER-2 negative AGC who have not progressed after a first-line with a platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimen. The hypothesis is that the early administration of an active, non-cross resistant regimen may delay disease progression and, consequently, improve pts’ quality of life. This strategy may also rescue all those subjects that become ineligible for a second-line therapy due to the rapid clinical deterioration. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial. Eligibility criteria are: unresectable/metastatic HER-2 negative AGC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer; ECOG PS 0-1; measurable and/or evaluable disease by RECIST v1.1; no progression after 3 months of therapy with either FOLFOX4, mFOLFOX6 or XELOX . The primary endpoint is to compare PFS of pts in ARM A (continuation of the same first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine) versus ARM B (switch maintenance to ramucirumab and placlitaxel). Secondary endpoints are: overall survival, time-to-treatment failure, overall response rate, duration of response, percentage of pts receiving a second-line therapy per treatment arm, safety and quality of life. Exploratory analyses to identify primary resistance and prognosis biomarkers are planned, including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) on archival tumor tissues. The ARMANI study is sponsored by the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and it is ongoing at 29 Italian centers with a planned population of 280 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02934464.

33 Background: The Institute of Medicine and Commission on Cancer recommend systematic delivery of supportive oncology care for cancer patients. The CSOC is focused on quality improvement (QI) of supportive care across Chicago cancer centers (Weldon ASCO ’17). Supportive oncology includes distress, practical, family, physical, nutrition, pain, fatigue and care concerns. To support QI, cross-institution teams developed unique, relevant tools, methods, care delivery processes, patient handouts and online training. Methods: Ten centers (5 academic, 1 VA, 1 public, 2 safety net, 1 community) implemented supportive oncology screening and care delivery quality improvements. Centers collected data for relevant Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) metrics. Analyses used simple frequencies and Fishers exact test. Results: Five of six QOPI measures were improved at statistically significant levels from 2014 to 2017, p < .00001. Improvements are more modest in 2016 & 2017 as 4 of the centers started this QI in 2017. Conclusions: The CSOC achieved significant improvements in supportive oncology screening and identifying and addressing patients’ needs and concerns. Additional work is needed to improve these measures to achieve the best quality of cancer care possible for every patient based on their needs and concerns. [Table: see text]

2559 Background: In the preliminary analysis of the FAMI-L1 study, we found a significant association between family history of cancer (FHC) and better clinical outcomes with anti-PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated advanced cancer patients treated with single agents PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients were categorized as follow: FHC-high (in case of at least one cancer diagnoses in both straight and collateral family line), FHC-low (in case of a cancer diagnoses in only one family line) and FHC-negative. FHC was collected till the second degree of relatedness. Results: Between September 2013 and May 2018, 772 consecutive patients were evaluated. Median age was 68 years; male/female ratio was 521/251. Primary tumors were: NSCLC (58.3%), melanoma (22.1%), renal cell carcinoma (16.6%) and others (3%). 114 patients (14.9%) had ECOG-PS ≥ 2. 341 patients (44.3) were FHC-positive: 268 of them (34.75) were FHC-low while 74 (9.6%) were FHC-high. FHC-high patients had a significantly higher incidence of irAEs compared to FHC-negative (55.4% vs 35.6%; p = 0.0012) and to FHC-low (41.4%; p = 0.0323). No significant differences were found in terms of ORR among subgroups (data not shown). At median follow-up of 15.8 months, median PFS was 9.1 months (95%CI: 8.1-10.4; 452 events) and median OS was 19.7 months (95%CI: 15.7-24.4; 436 censored). No significant differences were found regarding PFS (data not shown). Median OS of FHC-high patients was 31.6 months (95%CI: 26.2-31.6; 50 censored patients), which was significantly longer than 18.2 months (95%CI: 14.7-21.3; 229 censored patients) of FHC-negative patients (HR = 0.60 [95%CI: 0.39–0.92), p = 0.0213). No significant differences in terms of OS were found between FHC-high/low patients (data not shown). After adjusting for primary tumor, sex, treatment-line, number of metastatic sites and ECOG-PS, FHC-high was confirmed an independent predictor of longer OS compared to FHC-negative (HR: 0.57 [95%CI: 0.37-0.88], p = 0.0098). Conclusions: FHC-high seems to be an independent predictor for longer OS in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1. DNA damage and response (DDR) genes alterations may underlie that results.

TPS471 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized Phase 2b study inpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment(NCT02195180). Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this Phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory Phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is an international, randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (N = ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; stage IV disease; documented evidence of disease progression; available tumor tissue; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. An HR in OS of 0.725 is being targeted representing a conservative estimate based on the P2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC will be established to review safety at regular intervals and to review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441.