Search

PEREIRA, JULIANA/0000-0002-0655-2821; ZINZANI, PIER LUIGI/0000-0002-2112-2651; Trotman, Judith/0000-0001-8009-4593 WOS: 000462407900001 PubMed: 30707661 PURPOSEThe aim of this open-label, first-in-setting, randomized phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy of alisertib, an investigational Aurora A kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).PATIENTS AND METHODSAdult patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLone or more prior therapywere randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral alisertib 50 mg two times per day (days 1 to 7; 21-day cycle) or investigator-selected single-agent comparator, including intravenous pralatrexate 30 mg/m(2) (once per week for 6 weeks; 7-week cycle), or intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) or intravenous romidepsin 14 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15; 28-day cycle). Tumor tissue (disease subtype) and imaging were assessed by independent central review. Primary outcomes were overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Two interim analyses and one final analysis were planned.RESULTSBetween May 2012 and October 2014, 271 patients were randomly assigned (alisertib, n = 138; comparator, n = 133). Enrollment was stopped early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee as a result of the low probability of alisertib achieving PFS superiority with full enrollment. Centrally assessed overall response rate was 33% for alisertib and 45% for the comparator arm (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.08). Median PFS was 115 days for alisertib and 104 days for the comparator arm (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.637 to 1.178). The most common adverse events were anemia (53% of alisertib-treated patients v 34% of comparator-treated patients) and neutropenia (47% v 31%, respectively). A lower percentage of patients who received alisertib (9%) compared with the comparator (14%) experienced events that led to study drug discontinuation. Of 26 on-study deaths, five were considered treatment related (alisertib, n = 3 of 11; comparator, n = 2 of 15). Two-year overall survival was 35% for each arm.CONCLUSIONIn patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, alisertib was not statistically significantly superior to the comparator arm. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

TPS7593 Background: While PTCL is treated for curative intent, 5-year (yr) overall survival (OS) remains 20-25% with CHOP based therapy. For pts 10% by immunohistochemistry, and most significantly improved outcomes in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. This served as proof of principle that biomarker driven therapy can lead to improved outcomes in this rare disease (Horwitz et al Lancet 2019). Duvelisib is a gamma delta PI3 kinase inhibitor with a 50% overall response rate in PTCL and a trend toward a higher response rate in PTCL with a T-follicular helper (TFH) phenotype (Brammer et al. Blood 2021). Azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent that has shown a 75% overall response rate (ORR) in PTCL with TFH phenotype. CC-486, oral azacitidine, has been safely combined with CHOP and showed a 75% ORR with a higher ORR in PTCL with TFH phenotype (Ruan et al. Blood 2021). Methods: A051902 is a 3 arm randomized phase II US intergroup study in previously untreated PTCL with CD30 expression 60, ≤60) and TFH phenotype. Pts over age 60 will receive CHOP and those ≤60 will receive CHOEP. Prior to the randomized study, there is a safety lead-in study for the first 12 pts combining duvelisib 15mg BID with CHOP/CHOEP. The primary endpoint of the phase II study is complete remission (CR) rate by the Lugano 2014 criteria. The phase II study is powered for a 25% improvement in CR rate (45% vs 70%) in an experimental arm compared to CHOP/CHOEP with a 90% power and type I error rate of 10%. The phase II will enroll 159 pts (53 per arm). Key eligibility: 1. untreated PTCL (nodal T-cell lymphoma with TFH phenotype, follicular T-cell lymphoma, PTCL-NOS, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma, monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma) with CD30 expression

Purpose Four US National Clinical Trials Network components (Southwest Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and the AIDS Malignancy Consortium) conducted a phase II Intergroup clinical trial that used early interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging to determine the utility of response-adapted therapy for stage III to IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and Methods The Southwest Oncology Group S0816 (Fludeoxyglucose F 18-PET/CT Imaging and Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Additional Chemotherapy and G-CSF in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Hodgkin Lymphoma) trial enrolled 358 HIV-negative patients between July 1, 2009, and December 2, 2012. A PET scan was performed after two initial cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and was labeled PET2. PET2-negative patients (Deauville score 1 to 3) received an additional four cycles of ABVD, whereas PET2-positive patients (Deauville score 4 to 5) were switched to escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) for six cycles. Among 336 eligible and evaluable patients, the median age was 32 years (range, 18 to 60 years), with 52% stage III, 48% stage IV, 49% International Prognostic Score 0 to 2, and 51% score 3 to 7. Results Three hundred thirty-six of the enrolled patients were evaluable. Central review of the interim PET2 scan was performed in 331 evaluable patients, with 271 (82%) PET2-negative and 60 (18%) PET2-positive. Of 60 eligible PET2-positive patients, 49 switched to eBEACOPP as planned and 11 declined. With a median follow-up of 39.7 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate for 2-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 95% to 99%), and the 2-year estimate for progression-free survival (PFS) was 79% (95% CI, 74% to 83%). The 2-year estimate for PFS in the subset of patients who were PET2-positive after two cycles of ABVD was 64% (95% CI, 50% to 75%). Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were greater in the eBEACOPP arm than in the continued ABVD arm. Conclusion Response-adapted therapy based on interim PET imaging after two cycles of ABVD seems promising with a 2-year PFS of 64% for PET2-positive patients, which is much higher than the expected 2-year PFS of 15% to 30%.

8042 Background: Optimal consolidative therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. Avoidance of whole brain radiation may reduce risk of neurotoxicity. Non-radiation consolidative options include myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) or non-myeloablative chemotherapy. Methods: This is a randomized phase 2, National Clinical Trials Network study of induction methotrexate (MTX) (8 g/m2days 1, 15), temozolomide (TMZ) (150-200 mg/m2 D7-11), and rituximab (RTX) (C1 D3, 10, 17, 24 and C2 D3, 10) in four 28-day cycles followed by one cycle of cytarabine (ARA-C) (2 g/m2 BID, D1, 2) (MTRA). Following induction, patients (pts) received consolidation with thiotepa (5 mg/kg BID, D -5, -4) plus carmustine (400 mg/m2, day -6) and ASCT (Arm A) or one cycle of ARA-C (2 g/m2 BID, D1-4) plus infusional etoposide (40 mg/kg over 96h) (Arm B). The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS), designed to compare consolidation regimens. This report describes the results of the 5 cycles of induction therapy. Results: 113 pts (median age 61 years, range 33-75) were randomized (Arm A: 57, Arm B: 56) across 27 centers. 108 eligible pts who received induction therapy were evaluated. 36 pts (33.3%) did not proceed to consolidation, mainly due to disease progression (17), pt withdrawal (8), or adverse events including death (6). Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 12 pts (11.1%) during induction. Dose modifications of MTX were required in 75% of pts and 63.3% of cycles, mainly due to renal adjustments. Dose delays of MTX were required in 52.8% of pts and 22.2% of cycles. Overall response rate (CR, CRu, PR) at the end of induction was 65.7% (95% CI, 56%, 74.6%). Conclusions: While MTRA is feasible and active a significant proportion of pts did not receive consolidation, supporting the need to develop more effective induction strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT01511562 .

Purpose Concerns regarding neurocognitive toxicity of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) have motivated development of alternative, dose-intensive chemotherapeutic strategies as consolidation in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). We performed a multicenter study of high-dose consolidation, without WBRT, in PCNSL. Objectives were to determine: one, rate of complete response (CR) after remission induction therapy with methotrexate, temozolomide, and rituximab (MT-R); two, feasibility of a two-step approach using high-dose consolidation with etoposide plus cytarabine (EA); three, progression-free survival (PFS); and four, correlation between clinical and molecular prognostic factors and outcome. Patients and Methods Forty-four patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were treated with induction MT-R, and patients who achieved CR received EA consolidation. We performed a prospective analysis of molecular prognostic biomarkers in PCNSL in the setting of a clinical trial. Results The rate of CR to MT-R was 66%. The overall 2-year PFS was 0.57, with median follow-up of 4.9 years. The 2-year time to progression was 0.59, and for patients who completed consolidation, it was 0.77. Patients age > 60 years did as well as younger patients, and the most significant clinical prognostic variable was treatment delay. High BCL6 expression correlated with shorter survival. Conclusion CALGB 50202 demonstrates for the first time to our knowledge that dose-intensive consolidation for PCNSL is feasible in the multicenter setting and yields rates of PFS and OS at least comparable to those of regimens involving WBRT. On the basis of these encouraging results, an intergroup study has been activated comparing EA consolidation with myeloablative chemotherapy in this randomized trial in PCNSL, in which neither arm involves WBRT.

Purpose Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a poor prognosis subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with no accepted standard of care. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of pralatrexate, a novel antifolate with promising activity. Patients and Methods Patients with independently confirmed PTCL who progressed following ≥ 1 line of prior therapy received pralatrexate intravenously at 30 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles. Primary assessment of response was made by independent central review using the International Workshop Criteria. The primary end point was overall response rate. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Of 115 patients enrolled, 111 were treated with pralatrexate. The median number of prior systemic therapies was three (range, 1 to 12). The response rate in 109 evaluable patients was 29% (32 of 109), including 12 complete responses (11%) and 20 partial responses (18%), with a median DoR of 10.1 months. Median PFS and OS were 3.5 and 14.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (32%), mucositis (22%), neutropenia (22%), and anemia (18%). Conclusion To our knowledge, PROPEL (Pralatrexate in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma) is the largest prospective study conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Pralatrexate induced durable responses in relapsed or refractory PTCL irrespective of age, histologic subtypes, amount of prior therapy, prior methotrexate, and prior autologous stem-cell transplant. These data formed the basis for the US Food and Drug Administration approval of pralatrexate, the first drug approved for this disease.

Purpose Although most classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (CHL) patients are cured, a significant minority fails primary therapy and may die as a result of their disease. Age, stage, and other basic clinical and laboratory parameters, which comprise the International Prognostic Score (IPS), are used at diagnosis to predict outcome. To date, there is no consensus on biologic markers that add value to these parameters. Patients and Methods We evaluated 107 CHL patients for bcl-2, p53, and p21 expression by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays and correlated the results with outcome. The median follow-up of the 79 surviving patients was 6.8 years. Results Univariate analysis showed that age ≥ 45 years, stage III or IV, and IPS ≥ 3 were associated with a poor failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS). bcl-2 was expressed in 26% of patients and was associated with poor FFS and a trend for OS. p53 expression in combination with lack of p21 expression was not associated with outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that three factors were independently associated with both FFS and OS: age ≥ 45 years, stage III or IV, and bcl-2 expression. Using these three parameters, a scoring system was devised that stratified patients into three risk groups (with zero, one, or two to three of these risk factors) and a progressively worse FFS and OS (P < .001). Conclusion Expression of bcl-2 in CHL is a useful, independent prognostic marker and can be used in association with clinical parameters to identify newly diagnosed patients with a good, intermediate, or poor prognosis.

TPS7566 Background: Relapsed DLBCL in the rituximab era portends a poor prognosis with only about 25% of patients achieving long-term disease control following 2ndline therapy and AutoHCT. Patients with the ABC subtype have an inferior prognosis at diagnosis than those with GC and are overrepresented at relapse. In order to improve outcomes in ABC-DLBCL, we designed a study targeting disease pathobiology at the time of AutoHCT. Ibr has a safety profile allowing combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy and has single-agent activity with a 37% response rate in patients with relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL. Methods: This is an intergroup, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study combining Ibr or placebo with high-dose chemotherapy during conditioning with AutoHCT and for 12 months following AutoHCT. Pts with relapsed or refractory DLBCL have tissue submitted centrally for real-time review and subtype assignment by GEP (Frederick Laboratory). Key eligibility criteria include no more than 3 prior regimens, no active CNS involvement, no need for long-term anticoagulation, and no progression on prior Ibr. Pts with chemosensitive ABC-DLBCL are randomized to Ibr 560 mg or placebo with BEAM or CBV chemotherapy until day 0. After engraftment, pts receive Ibr 560 mg daily or placebo for 12 additional cycles. Pts with progressive disease on placebo can cross over to Ibr monotherapy. An initial safety cohort of 6 pts is being enrolled to evaluate the tolerability of Ibr with concurrent BEAM and CBV therapy. The primary endpoint is superior 2-year PFS (Ha/H0: 67% vs 50%). Secondary endpoints include time to count recovery, post-transplant response rates, OS, PFS, and incidence of 2arymalignancies. In correlative studies, we will assess the prognostic and predictive role of pre-transplant FDG-PET in the setting of Ibr or placebo therapy, the role of emergent BCR pathway mutations, double hit genetics, and pharmacogenetic determinants on treatment outcome and toxicities. We expect to accrue 296 patients over 4 years. An Alliance/BMT-CTN study: NCT02443077 Clinical trial information: NCT02443077.

e19043Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with dual expression (DE) of MYC and BCL2 has poorer prognosis than non-DE following 1st line R-CHOP. Recent data show relapsed/refractory (r...

8560 Background: Gene expression profiling has suggested that the proliferation signature is an important predictor of outcome in MCL. Retrospective studies have suggested that the proliferative index, measured by mitoses or Ki67, is an important prognostic indicator. This has not been validated in a US cooperative group setting or in the context of aggressive therapy. We assessed Ki67 and PIM1 (a cell cycle-related gene upregulated in blastoid MCL) expression in a prospective phase 2 cooperative group study. Methods: CALGB 59909 examined the efficacy of aggressive chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in untreated MCL patients less than 70 years of age. Cases with available material were studied for Ki67 and PIM1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Ki67 was quantitated by image analysis (IA Ki67) and manually as # positive cells/1000x hpf (Ki67-count). PIM1 staining was scored semi-quantitatively (0–3+). Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were t...

6695 Background: Historically patients with skin infiltration by leukemic cells (Leukemia Cutis, LC) carried a poor prognosis. However, it is not clear if this is solely because of LC or other high...