1. A phase II study of nilotinib administered to imatinib resistant or intolerant patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in accelerated phase (AP)
- Author
-
P. le Coutre, N. Gattermann, A. Hochhaus, R. Larson, A. Weitzman, A. Haque, F. Giles, S. G. O′Brien, and H. M. Kantarjian
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Oncology ,hemic and lymphatic diseases - Abstract
7026 Background: CML-AP is often associated with imatinib-resistance and the occurrence of BCR-ABL mutations. This phase II open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Nilotinib, a potent novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in imatinib-resistant or - intolerant CML-AP pts. Methods: Imatinib-resistance and -intolerance were defined using standard criteria, and all resistant pts failed imatinib >/= 600mg/day. Primary endpoint was a confirmed hematologic response (HR) determined by conventional ITT analysis. Nilotinib was started at 400mg BID and escalated to 600mg BID for inadequate responses. Results: Safety and efficacy are reported for first 64 consecutively enrolled pts completing >/= 8 mos treatment. 52 (81%) were imatinib-resistant; 12 (19%) -intolerant. Median duration of CML was 74 mos; median duration of prior imatinib use was 28 mos. Median duration of nilotinib exposure was 208 days; median average dose intensity (mg/days) was 787. Median cumulative duration of dose interruption was 23 days. Treatment is ongoing for 27 (42%) pts; 37 (58%) have discontinued (9 for AEs; 17 for disease progression). HR occurred in 38 (59%) pts, of which 15 (23%) were complete, 8 (13%) were marrow responses, and 15 (23%) returned to chronic phase. MCyR occurred in 23 (36%) pts; 14 (22%) were complete and 9 (14%) were partial. 6 (9%) pts did not respond; 5 (8%) pts had disease progression. Median time to HR was 1.0 (1–3) mos and to MCyR was 2.0 (1–8) mos. Estimated 1-yr survival rate was 69% and median duration of HR has not been reached. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (40%), asymptomatic lipase elevations (17%), and anemia (16%) pts. No pts experienced Grade 3/4 peripheral edema, or pleural/pericardial effusions; 2 pts had pulmonary edema. Conclusion: In pts with CML-AP, nilotinib is an effective therapeutic option in CML-AP pts with imatinib-resistance or -intolerance and is generally well tolerated with acceptable rates of myelosuppression and minimal non- hematologic toxicities. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF