Search

68 Background: HER2 amplification is an emerging biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) with increased copy number associated with improved clinical outcomes to HER2 targeting. RAS/RAF wildtype CRC also benefit from use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (EGFRi). The sequencing of EGFRi versus HER2 inhibition in low copy number HER2 amplified CRC remains uncertain. Patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) allow an ex vivo method to assess treatment sensitivity. We examined treatment sensitivity of a HER2 amplified PDCO at baseline and following resistance to panitumumab and trastuzumab. Methods: Following IRB-approval, fresh CRC tissue was cultured to maturation. After expansion, subcultures were treated with stepwise (20%) increase to physiologic Cmax of panitumumab (230ug/mL) and trastuzumab (180ug/mL). Threshold for escalation was median relative growth of +20% at 96h. Sensitivity was assessed on primary culture (RC1), panitumumab resistance (RC1-P) and trastuzumab resistance (RC1-T) using 96h of physiologic Cmax panitumumab, trastuzumab, and combination trastuzumab/pertuzumab. Individual sphere response was assessed for change in mean NADH autofluorescence intensity and ratio of NADH/FAD signal. Response was assessed at 96h in comparison to control using effect size of Glass’s Delta (GΔ). Results: Molecular profiling revealed HER2 copy number of 14 with no concurrent alterations in RAS, RAF, or PIK3CA. Time to resistance was similar between panitumumab (55 days) and trastuzumab (51 days). RC1 had baseline growth (+116%) which was reduced with single agent panitumumab (+17%, GΔ=1.40) with intermediate sensitivity to trastuzumab (+48%, GΔ=0.95) and trastuzumab/pertuzumab (46%, GΔ=0.99). Normalized NADH/FAD ratio revealed significant metabolic response to panitumumab (-20%, GΔ=0.66) and trastuzumab/pertuzumab (-35%, GΔ=1.16) with insignificant effect of single agent trastuzumab (-14%, GΔ=0.46). Following resistance to panitumumab, RC1-P had persistent growth with trastuzumab (+68%) which improved in combination trastuzumab/pertuzumab (+34%, GΔ=1.16). Following resistance to trastuzumab, RC1-T was insensitive to EGFRi with panitumumab including persistent growth (+58%, GΔ=0.70) and unchanged metabolism (+2%, GΔ=-0.10). Conclusions: Therapeutic dose escalation in a single PDCO of HER2 amplified CRC suggests improved sensitivity to EGFRi and dual HER2 targeting with trastuzumab/pertuzumab. Resistance to EGFRi resulted in persistent sensitivity to dual HER2 inhibition using trastuzumab/pertuzumab, however resistance to single agent trastuzumab. Resistance to trastuzumab resulted in future insensitivity to EGFRi. Molecular profiling at resistance revealed no pathologic alterations in EGFR or ERBB2 signaling, with ongoing analysis of transcriptional changes by RNAseq.

177 Background: No current clinical tool can predict the efficacy of cancer therapeutics for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We recently demonstrated the feasibility of using patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) to examine therapeutic response and tumor heterogeneity for individual patients with CRC via optical metabolic imaging (OMI). Here we expand these analyses in a cohort of patients with clinical outcomes. Methods: CRC tissue was collected from patients on IRB-approved protocols. PDCOs were matured and treated with chemotherapy regimens concurrent with patient treatment. Previously established effect size response thresholds were used for diameter ( > 1.5) and OMI ( > 0.5) following 48 hours of treatment. OMI measures the intrinsic autofluorescence of NAD(P)H and FAD using 2-photon microscopy without specific reagents or dyes. Clinical outcomes were prospectively collected by manual chart review. Results: 12 CRC PDCOs were established from patients with CRC. PDCOs were collected from initial diagnosis and advanced setting of both primary and metastatic sites by core needle biopsy and surgical resection. Differential growth rates were observed across lines. PDCOs with RAS/RAF alterations had more uniform growth, while PDCOs without these alterations demonstrated more heterogeneous growth and metabolism. Clinical correlation of PDCOs response with recurrence of disease in the adjuvant setting will be presented. Cases with prior 5-FU-based chemotherapy at the time of PDCO collection had intermediate sensitivity. For PDCOs collected pre-treatment, PDCO response predicted clinical response for 5 of 6 cases using predefined sensitivity thresholds. In the case that overall PDCO response did not predict clinical response, a heterogenous response was observed with distinct sensitive and resistant populations. Across PDCOs, greater post-treatment heterogeneity was observed in resistant lines compared to those with treatment sensitivity. Conclusions: Tumor heterogeneity in treatment response can be assessed using PDCOs growth and metabolism. The utility of PDCOs to predict clinical outcomes for patients with CRC deserves further prospective validation.