1. System for High-Intensity Evaluation During Radiation Therapy (SHIELD-RT): A Prospective Randomized Study of Machine Learning–Directed Clinical Evaluations During Radiation and Chemoradiation
- Author
-
Stacey Shields, Neville Eclov, Alyssa Cobb, Mary Malicki, Samantha M. Thomas, Donna Niedzwiecki, Yvonne M. Mowery, Manisha Palta, Jessica D. Tenenbaum, Nicole H. Dalal, Julian C. Hong, and S.J. Stephens
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,MEDLINE ,Machine learning ,computer.software_genre ,Risk Assessment ,Machine Learning ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Text mining ,Neoplasms ,Acute care ,Ambulatory Care ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective randomized study ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Radiotherapy ,business.industry ,High intensity ,Standard of Care ,Chemoradiotherapy ,Emergency department ,Middle Aged ,Models, Theoretical ,Quality Improvement ,Hospitalization ,Radiation therapy ,ROC Curve ,Oncology ,Area Under Curve ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Artificial intelligence ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,business ,computer ,Forecasting - Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing outpatient radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) frequently require acute care (emergency department evaluation or hospitalization). Machine learning (ML) may guide interventions to reduce this risk. There are limited prospective studies investigating the clinical impact of ML in health care. The objective of this study was to determine whether ML can identify high-risk patients and direct mandatory twice-weekly clinical evaluation to reduce acute care visits during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS During this single-institution randomized quality improvement study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04277650 ), 963 outpatient adult courses of RT and CRT started from January 7 to June 30, 2019, were evaluated by an ML algorithm. Among these, 311 courses identified by ML as high risk (> 10% risk of acute care during treatment) were randomized to standard once-weekly clinical evaluation (n = 157) or mandatory twice-weekly evaluation (n = 154). Both arms allowed additional evaluations on the basis of clinician discretion. The primary end point was the rate of acute care visits during RT. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and decile calibration plots. RESULTS Twice-weekly evaluation reduced rates of acute care during treatment from 22.3% to 12.3% (difference, −10.0%; 95% CI, −18.3 to −1.6; relative risk, 0.556; 95% CI, 0.332 to 0.924; P = .02). Low-risk patients had a 2.7% acute care rate. Model discrimination was good in high- and low-risk patients undergoing standard once-weekly evaluation (AUC, 0.851). CONCLUSION In this prospective randomized study, ML accurately triaged patients undergoing RT and CRT, directing clinical management with reduced acute care rates versus standard of care. This prospective study demonstrates the potential benefit of ML in health care and offers opportunities to enhance care quality and reduce health care costs.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF