Search

323 Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) can achieve durable local control and even curation in patients with locally advanced irresectable esophageal carcinoma. However, due to side-effects of this treatment, survival benefit may come at the cost of quality of life (QoL). This study aims to report prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after dCRT. Methods: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus receiving dCRT and participating in the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-gastric cancer Patients (POCOP) were eligible. dCRT was defined as radiotherapy consisting of at least 50.4Gy/28F with concomitant weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. PROMs were extracted from the POCOP database, which uses validated questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and OG25. Questionnaires were collected at baseline, at three months (3M), at six months (6M) and every three months thereafter for a total follow-up of 2 years. Clinical data were derived from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). PROMs were compared to baseline values using mixed effect models. Results: In total, 153 patients were included. The median age was 70 years and patients were predominantly male (73.2%). 51% of patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma and the majority had a performance status score 0 (39.9%) or 1 (46.4%). The number of returned questionnaires ranged from 96 at baseline to 106 at 3M and 36 at 2 years. Global Health Status at baseline was 69.9 (SD 17.6) and declined at 3M, although not significantly. At later time points, scores showed a trend towards improvement compared to baseline. Patients reported significantly lower physical (71.5, SD 19.4), role (67.8, SD 31.0) and social functioning (72.4, SD 29.1) at 3M compared to baseline (82.7, 79.7 and 81.5 respectively, all p

Purpose To compare pre-agreed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery or surgery alone. Secondary aims were to examine the effect of nCRT on HRQOL before surgery and the effect of surgery on HRQOL. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to nCRT (carboplatin plus paclitaxel with concurrent 41.4-Gy radiotherapy) followed by surgery or surgery alone. HRQOL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and –Oesophageal Cancer Module (QLQ-OES24) questionnaires pretreatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The nCRT group also received preoperative questionnaires. Physical functioning (PF; QLQ-C30) and eating problems (EA; QLQ-OES24) were chosen as predefined primary end points. Predefined secondary end points were global QOL (GQOL; QLQ-C30), fatigue (FA; QLQ-C30), and emotional problems (EM; QLQ-OES24). Results A total of 363 patients were analyzed. No statistically significant differences in postoperative HRQOL were found between treatment groups. In the nCRT group, PF, EA, GQOL, FA, and EM scores deteriorated 1 week after nCRT (Cohen’s d: −0.93, P < .001; 0.47, P < .001; −0.84, P < .001; 1.45, P < .001; and 0.32, P = .001, respectively). In both treatment groups, all end points declined 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline (Cohen’s d: −1.00, 0.33, −0.47, −0.34, and 0.33, respectively; all P < .001), followed by a continuous gradual improvement. EA, GQOL, and EM were restored to baseline levels during follow-up, whereas PF and FA remained impaired 1 year postoperatively (Cohen’s d: 0.52 and −0.53, respectively; both P < .001). Conclusion Although HRQOL declined during nCRT, no effect of nCRT was apparent on postoperative HRQOL compared with surgery alone. In addition to the improvement in survival, these findings support the view that nCRT according to the Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study–regimen can be regarded as a standard of care.

Background: Personalized prediction of treatment outcomes can aid patients with cancer when deciding on treatment options. Existing prediction models for esophageal and gastric cancer, however, have mostly been developed for survival prediction after surgery (ie, when treatment has already been completed). Furthermore, prediction models for patients with metastatic cancer are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop prediction models of overall survival at diagnosis for patients with potentially curable and metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer (the SOURCE study). Methods: Data from 13,080 patients with esophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed in 2015 through 2018 were retrieved from the prospective Netherlands Cancer Registry. Four Cox proportional hazards regression models were created for patients with potentially curable and metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer. Predictors, including treatment type, were selected using the Akaike information criterion. The models were validated with temporal cross-validation on their C-index and calibration. Results: The validated model’s C-index was 0.78 for potentially curable gastric cancer and 0.80 for potentially curable esophageal cancer. For the metastatic models, the c-indices were 0.72 and 0.73 for esophageal and gastric cancer, respectively. The 95% confidence interval of the calibration intercepts and slopes contain the values 0 and 1, respectively. Conclusions: The SOURCE prediction models show fair to good c-indices and an overall good calibration. The models are the first in esophageal and gastric cancer to predict survival at diagnosis for a variety of treatments. Future research is needed to demonstrate their value for shared decision-making in clinical practice.

281 Background: To analyze the effect of radiation dose escalation to the primary tumor on local control, locoregional control, survival and toxicity in definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-4, N0-3, M0 carcinoma of the esophagus were randomized between a standard dose of 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy/5,5 weeks to the tumor and regional lymph nodes (SD) versus the same dose combined with an integrated boost of 0,4 Gy per fraction (total 61,6 Gy) to the primary tumor (HD). Chemotherapy consisted of 6 weekly concurrent carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) in both arms. The primary endpoint was local progression free survival (LPFS) and 260 patients were needed to detect a difference of 15% (power: 80%). Secondary endpoints were locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Patients were stratified for histological subtype. Results: Between September 2012 and June 2018, 260 patients were included. Reasons for inoperability were proximal localization and patient preference (44%), comorbidity (30%), unresectable lymph nodes (11%), T4 (5%), local recurrence 2% and combinations (7%). 61% of the patients had a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 39% had an adenocarcinoma (AC). 94% completed radiation treatment and 85% had at least 5 courses chemotherapy. Median follow up time was 45 months. 3-year LPFS was 70% in the SD arm versus 76% in the HD arm (ns). LPFS for SCC and AC was 74% versus 81% and 62% versus 65% for SD and HD, resp. (ns). 3-year LRPFS was 53% and 63% for the SD and HD arm resp. (p = 0.08). 1 year any progression free survival was 60% for SCC and 50% for AC, without a significant difference between SD and HD (p = 0,5). 3-year OS was 41% versus 40% for SD and HD resp. Overall grade 4 and 5 CTC toxicity was 12% and 4% in the SD arm versus 14% and 10% in the HD arm, resp. Conclusions: In definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer, radiation dose escalation up to 61,6 Gy to the primary tumor did not result in a significant increase in local control over 50,4 Gy. Numerical improvement of locoregional control after HD was observed with an increase in toxicity and without improving OS. Clinical trial information: NL38343.018.11.