Search

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of three hormonal manipulations in the palliation of chemoresistant ovarian cancer, and to analyze the results in the light of other clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three sequential phase II trials were performed in patients with refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma, using high-dose megestrol acetate (800 mg/d for 30 days, then 400 mg/d), high-dose tamoxifen (80 mg/d for 30 days, then 40 mg/d), and aminoglutethimide (1 g/d plus tapering doses of hydrocortisone). Results were compared with those described in the world literature from trials of the same or similar agents. RESULTS No responses were seen among 30 assessable patients treated with megestrol acetate, and most (but not all) similar trials have reported low response rates. Five responses (17%) were seen among 29 patients treated with tamoxifen. Two responses exceeded 5 years in duration. No responses were seen among 15 patients treated with aminoglutethimide. CONCLUSION Antiestrogen therapy may offer the possibility of useful and, occasionally, long-term palliation of refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma, with little toxicity. There may be a trend toward a dose-response effect, which represents a suitable topic for a future prospective trial.

Eighteen patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of adriamycin for 14-60 days in a phase I study in which the dose rates were escalated from 2 mg/sq m/day to 5 mg/sq m/day to establish the optimal dose to be delivered over a 30-day period. The drug was delivered via a tunneled subclavian catheter by a portable infusion pump (Cormed model ML-6) primed to provide a volume of diluted drug of 10 cc/day. Leukopenia and stomatitis were observed at 4 mg/sq m/day doses or greater in 50% of courses. At doses less than 4 mg/sq m/day, only 3/17 courses (18%) were associated with stomatitis. Partial alopecia developed in all patients, but less than 50% of scalp hair was affected. The cumulative dose of continuous infusion adriamycin at 30 days is comparable to the dose delivered by standard bolus intermittent schedules (60-90 mg/sq m g 21 days), but the adverse drug effects are eliminated or substantially reduced. Cardiac toxicity was assessed in selected patients treated to 450 mg/sq m or greater by cardiac biopsy and/or gated pool studies. No histopathologic lesions were noted in 3 patients receiving 450 mg/sq m or greater. The recommended daily dose rate of adriamycin in this protracted infusion regimen is 3 mg/sq m/day. The phase II study of this schedule and dose rate in 38 additional patients (a total of 52 evaluable patients) demonstrated objective responses in 1/9 soft tissue sarcoma, 1/3 mesothelioma, 1/3 hepatoma, and 2/13 breast cancer. Phase III studies of the protracted continuous infusion schedule for adriamycin are indicated in that clinical activity is demonstrated at a substantial reduction in toxicity. Pharmacologic studies expanding the existing data base are also necessary.

A totally implanted subclavian venous access system composed of a reservoir and silastic catheter was employed in 92 patients receiving infusion chemotherapy and/or hyperalimentation. The major catheter complication was subclavian or jugular vein thrombosis observed in 15 patients (16%). Thrombosis was observed in the ipsilateral subclavian or jugular vein surrounding the catheter without restricting function, except in two patients with thrombosis in the vein at the end of the catheter. Prophylaxis with low-dose Coumadin was effective in preventing thrombosis in high-risk patients as defined by a history of prior thrombosis. Streptokinase and/or heparin relieved the signs and symptoms of thrombosis, but clot dissolution or reversal of collateral flow was not observed. Explantation of the catheter was not necessary in all patients in that embolic complications of the thrombosis were not observed, and the system was retained and functioned in five patients in spite of the presence of thrombosis around the catheter. Other complications of the implanted system include "pocket" infection, catheter migration, and occlusion. Most complications may be managed without obligate catheter removal.

Fifty-five patients with advanced cancer and elevated plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels greater than 20 ng/mL (Roche assay) were monitored by clinical parameters for disease activity and a daily plasma specimen was obtained and stored frozen. In 45 patients with evaluable metastatic lesions, 35 were stable; five had progressive disease; and five had regressive disease. Plasma CEA in patients with stable disease showed an overall coefficient of variation of 13%. The CV did not differ according to various quantitative CEA levels from less than 100 ng/mL to greater than 1,000 ng/mL. The coefficient of variation in responding and progressive disease patients ranged from 13% to 63%. An analysis of CEA variability relative to the baseline CEA level was possible using the formula square root 2 times the variability about the mean; this yields a value of +/- 36% representing the range within which approximately 95% of sequential CEA levels would lie in the absence of a clinical change in disease. In 225 CEA determinations in stable disease patients, 6% demonstrated an increase beyond this level (36%) and none demonstrated a decrease of 36% or more from the baseline level. This study establishes guidelines for the boundaries of change in plasma CEA that may be applied as a criterion (in conjunction with standard objective disease parameters) for determination of tumor response to therapy.

One hundred seventy-nine patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer not previously treated with chemotherapy were entered into a prospective randomized clinical trial by the Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program (MAOP) to compare two schedules of delivery for single-agent fluorouracil (5-FU). The "standard" treatment was a schedule commonly employed in clinical practice, namely, a daily bolus dose administered intravenously (IV) for five consecutive days and repeated at 5-week intervals. The investigational treatment was a continuous infusion of 5-FU administered 24 hours a day for a protracted time (10 weeks or more). Both treatments were continued until the development of disease progression or unless interrupted for toxicity. Using stringent objective criteria requiring independent confirmation of x-ray or scan-documented response, the tumor response rate reached 7% (six of 87) for the bolus arm and 30% (26 of 87) for the infusion arms (P less than .001). Toxicity was substantially different for the two arms with major leukopenia observed only on the bolus arm, 22% developing grade 3 (severe) or grade 4 (life-threatening) leukopenia with four sepsis-related deaths. Hand-foot syndrome was observed only in the infusional arm, requiring treatment interruptions and dose reductions in 24% of patients, but with little impact on quality of life. In spite of the major difference in objective response rate, overall survival for the two groups was comparable. Administration of 5-FU as a continuous infusion for protracted periods clearly improves the therapeutic index for this agent in patients with advanced colon cancer with respect to response rate and reduced toxicity. This schedule appears workable in the community setting and yields response rates similar to those reported for 5-FU with high-dose leucovorin, but without the gastroin testinal toxicity profile of the latter combination.

A method to potentially increase the effectiveness of combination 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation therapy (XRT) using protracted (more than 30 days) venous infusion (PVI) of 5-FU with conventionally fractionated XRT (180 to 200 cGy per day) (100 cGy = 100 rad) is described. Forty-one patients were treated with this combination with acceptable acute toxicity. In 95% of patients, the toxicity was mild or moderate and symptom control was achieved with medications or a short treatment interruption. In two patients (5%), severe gastrointestinal side effects resulted in cessation of all therapy. This method of administration of 5-FU is feasible, and we have demonstrated that it can be safely used with a course of conventionally fractionated, high-dose (approximately to 6,500 cGy) radiation therapy.