Search

Purpose: CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells demonstrate unprecedented responses in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL); however, relapse remains a substantial challenge. Short CAR T-cell persistence contributes to this risk; therefore, strategies to improve persistence are needed., Methods: We conducted a pilot clinical trial of a humanized CD19 CAR T-cell product (huCART19) in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL (n = 72) or B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 2), treated in two cohorts: with (retreatment, n = 33) or without (CAR-naive, n = 41) prior CAR exposure. Patients were monitored for toxicity, response, and persistence of huCART19., Results: Seventy-four patients 1-29 years of age received huCART19. Cytokine release syndrome developed in 62 (84%) patients and was grade 4 in five (6.8%). Neurologic toxicities were reported in 29 (39%), three (4%) grade 3 or 4, and fully resolved in all cases. The overall response rate at 1 month after infusion was 98% (100% in B-ALL) in the CAR-naive cohort and 64% in the retreatment cohort. At 6 months, the probability of losing huCART19 persistence was 27% (95% CI, 14 to 41) for CAR-naive and 48% (95% CI, 30 to 64) for retreatment patients, whereas the incidence of B-cell recovery was 15% (95% CI, 6 to 28) and 58% (95% CI, 33 to 77), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12 and 24 months, respectively, was 84% (95% CI, 72 to 97) and 74% (95% CI, 60 to 90) in CAR-naive and 74% (95% CI, 56 to 97) and 58% (95% CI, 37 to 90) in retreatment cohorts., Conclusion: HuCART19 achieved durable remissions with long-term persistence in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL, including after failure of prior CAR T-cell therapy., Competing Interests: David M. BarrettTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Therakos David T. TeacheyConsulting or Advisory Role: SobiResearch Funding: Novartis, Beam Therapeutics, NeoImmuneTech Colleen CallahanConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Peerview Susan R. RheingoldEmployment: OptiNoseStock and Other Ownership Interests: OptiNoseConsulting or Advisory Role: PfizerResearch Funding: Pfizer Richard AplencExpert Testimony: Vorys Pamela A. ShawPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am part of a patent owned by UPenn and currently licensed to Novartis for an algorithm that predicts severe cytokine release syndrome for the CART 19 therapy. I receive 10% of the licensing fees Edward PequignotPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: As part of Penn's role in the FDA-approval of CAR-T therapy, and for my part as an employee of Penn involved in their research in CAR-T, I have received royalties of approximately $300 in US dollars over the past 2 years Jennifer L. BrogdonEmployment: Novartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchStock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Donald L. SiegelResearch Funding: Tmunity Therapeutics IncPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: A patent, owned by the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, on which I am listed as an inventor is licensed to Alexion Pharmaceuticals. I receive royalties as stipulated in the University of Pennsylvania Faculty HandbookExpert Testimony: Regeneron Megan M. DavisLeadership: Cellares CorporationConsulting or Advisory Role: Tmunity Therapeutics IncResearch Funding: Tmunity Therapeutics IncPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research—royalties and milestones for patents/knowhow, Tmunity Therapeutics—royalties andmilestones from patents/knowhow Simon F. LaceyConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Tmunity Therapeutics Inc, Cabaletta Bio, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patents and IP related to CTL019 (Kymriah) assigned by the University of Pennsylvania to Novartis Elizabeth O. HexnerConsulting or Advisory Role: Blueprint Medicines, ABIM Subspecialty BoardResearch Funding: Blueprint Medicines, Tmunity Therapeutics Inc Gerald B. WertheimEmployment: Johnson & JohnsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson Bruce L. LevineStock and Other Ownership Interests: Tmunity Therapeutics IncHonoraria: Novartis, TerumoConsulting or Advisory Role: Avectas, Ori Biotech, Vycellix, Immuneel Therapeutics, In8bio, Patheon/ThermoFisher Viral Vector ServicesResearch Funding: Tmunity Therapeutics IncPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual property and patents in the field of cell and gene therapyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Avectas, Terumo Carl H. JuneLeadership: AC ImmuneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celldex, Tmunity Therapeutics Inc, Cabaletta Bio, Carisma Therapeutics, DeCART Therapeutics, Bluesphere Bio, Cellares, ZIOPHARM Oncology, Decheng Capital, Posieda Therapeutics, VerismaHonoraria: PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Celldex, Viracta Therapeutics, Cabaletta Bio, Carisma Therapeutics, Kiadis Pharma, WIRB-Copernicus Group, Janssen OncologyResearch Funding: Novartis, Tmunity Therapeutics IncPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: IP licensed to Novartis; Royalties paid to University of Pennsylvania, Office of Naval Research; IP and patent royalties, IP licensed to Tmunity Stephan A. GruppConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Cellular Biomedicine Group, TCR2 Therapeutics, Humanigen, Roche, Adaptimmune, Alimera Sciences, Cabaletta Bio, CRISPR Therapeutics/VertexResearch Funding: Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Servier, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, VertexPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UPenn Toxicity management patentExpert Testimony: Juno Therapeutics Shannon L. MaudeConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Wugen IncResearch Funding: NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Kite, a Gilead company, Wugen IncNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: To determine whether dexrazoxane provides effective cardioprotection during frontline treatment of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without increasing relapse risk or noncardiac toxicities of the chemotherapy regimens., Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter study of all pediatric patients with AML without high allelic ratio FLT3/ITD treated in the Children's Oncology Group trial AAML1031 between 2011 and 2016. Median follow-up was 3.5 years. Dexrazoxane was administered at the discretion of treating physicians and documented at each course. Ejection fraction (EF) and shortening fraction (SF) were recorded after each course and at regular intervals in follow-up. Per protocol, anthracyclines were to be withheld if there was evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) defined as SF < 28% or EF < 55%. Occurrence of LVSD, trends in EF and SF, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were compared by dexrazoxane exposure., Results: A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analyses; 96 were exposed to dexrazoxane at every anthracycline course, and 918 were never exposed. Distributions of sex, age, race, presenting WBC count, risk group, treatment arm, and compliance with cardiac monitoring were similar for dexrazoxane-exposed and -unexposed patients. Dexrazoxane-exposed patients had significantly smaller EF and SF declines than unexposed patients across courses and a lower risk for LVSD (26.5% v 42.2%; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; P = .009). Dexrazoxane-exposed patients had similar 5-year EFS (49.0% v 45.1%; P = .534) and OS (65.0% v 61.9%; P = .613) to those unexposed; however, there was a suggestion of lower TRM with dexrazoxane (5.7% v 12.7%; P = .068)., Conclusion: Dexrazoxane preserved cardiac function without compromising EFS and OS or increasing noncardiac toxicities. Dexrazoxane should be considered for cardioprotection during frontline treatment of pediatric AML.

Purpose: Late cardiotoxicity after pediatric acute myeloid leukemia therapy causes substantial morbidity and mortality. The impact of early-onset cardiotoxicity on treatment outcomes is less well understood. Thus, we evaluated the risk factors for incident early cardiotoxicity and the impacts of cardiotoxicity on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS)., Methods: Cardiotoxicity was ascertained through adverse event monitoring over the course of follow-up among 1,022 pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated in the Children's Oncology Group trial AAML0531. It was defined as grade 2 or higher left ventricular systolic dysfunction on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) definitions., Results: Approximately 12% of patients experienced cardiotoxicity over a 5-year follow-up, with more than 70% of incident events occurring during on-protocol therapy. Documented cardiotoxicity during on-protocol therapy was significantly associated with subsequent off-protocol toxicity. Overall, the incidence was higher among noninfants and black patients, and in the setting of a bloodstream infection. Both EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.1; P = .004) and OS (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2, P = .005) were significantly worse in patients with documented cardiotoxicity. Impacts on EFS were equivalent whether the incident cardiotoxicity event occurred in the absence (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.2; P = .017) or presence of infection (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7; P = .069) compared with patients without documented cardiotoxicity. However, the reduction in OS was more pronounced for cardiotoxicity not associated with infection (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.5; P = .004) than for infection-associated cardiotoxicity (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.4; P = .387)., Conclusion: Early treatment-related cardiotoxicity may be associated with decreased EFS and OS. Cardioprotective strategies are urgently needed to improve relapse risk and both short- and long-term mortality outcomes.