Search

Rationale and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare image quality, presence and grade of artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in pancreatic tissue between high-resolution navigator-triggered (NT) restricted field of view (rFOV) FOCUS single-shot (SS) echo-planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and NT large FOV SS-EPI DWI., Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed with GE 3-T systems using a 32-channel body array coil. Seventeen consecutive patients were imaged. A 5-point scale semiquantitative grading system was used to evaluate image quality and general artifacts. Signal-to-noise ratio and ADC were measured in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test, with differences considered significant for P value less than 0.05., Results: More artifacts were present on large FOV compared with rFOV FOCUS SS-EPI DW images (P < 0.01). Restricted field of view image quality was subjectively better (P < 0.01). No difference in the signal-to-noise ratio was demonstrated between the 2 image datasets. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were significantly lower (P < 0.01) when calculated from rFOV images than large FOV images., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate better image quality and reduced artifacts in rFOV images compared with large FOV DWI. Measurements from ADC maps derived from rFOV DWI show significantly lower ADC values when compared with ADC maps derived from large FOV DWI.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of single-source dual-energy computed tomography (ssDECT) in iodine quantification using various segmentation methods in an ex vivo model., Methods: Ten sausages, injected with variable quantities of iodinated contrast, were inserted into 2 livers and scanned with ssDECT. Material density iodine images were reconstructed. Three radiologists segmented each sausage. Iodine concentration, volume, and absolute quantity were measured. Agreement between the measured and injected iodine was assessed with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Intrareader agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: Air bubbles were observed in sausage (IX). Sausage (X) was within the same view as hyper-attenuating markers used for localization. With IX and X excluded, CCC and ICC were greater than 0.98 and greater than 0.88. When included, CCC and ICC were greater than 0.94 and greater than 0.79., Conclusions: Iodine quantification was reproducible and precise. However, accuracy reduced in sausages consisting of air filled cavities and within the same view as hyperattenuating markers.