Search

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between tumor size, nasal symptoms including olfactory function, and posoperative atrophic mucosal changes after the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). METHODS This was a retrospective review of the medical records of 112 patients who underwent the 2 nostrils/4 hands EETSA with bilateral modified nasoseptal rescue flaps between February 2009 and January 2016. Pre- and postoperative paranasal sinus computed tomography, nasal cavity endoscopic images, the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test, Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT), the Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 were conducted. Nasal mucosal changes as determined by endoscopy were divided into 4 groups: normal to normal, Group A; atrophy to atrophy, Group B; normal to atrophy, Group C; and atrophy to more atrophy, Group D. The Mimics program was used to calculate nasal cavity volume changes after surgery. RESULTS There were significant differences between pre- and postoperative olfactory function as reflected by the CCCRC (P

Background To investigate the effect of rhinosinusitis in patients who undergo surgery via the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery via the EETSA between February 2009 and November 2016. In total, 505 patients were included in the study. Preoperative paranasal sinus computed tomography, sellar magnetic resonance imaging, and nasal endoscopy were performed for all the patients. Results Fifteen patients without sphenoid sinusitis underwent surgery with the concomitant transsphenoidal approach and functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and showed no central nervous system (CNS) complication. During surgery via the EETSA, the presence of rhinosinusitis did not significantly affect the incidence of postoperative CNS infection (P = 0.051), except for sphenoid sinusitis (P = 0.003). Conversely, the incidence of postoperative CNS infection was not related significantly to the Lund-Mackay score or tumor size. The risk of CNS infection was 12.151-fold higher in patients with sphenoid sinusitis (95% confidence interval, 3.153-46.827; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion Surgery via the EETSA and functional endoscopic sinus surgery can be safely performed together in most patients with rhinosinusitis. However, sphenoid sinus infection appears to be a predisposing factor for postoperative CNS infection. Therefore, a separate surgical procedure for sphenoid lesions should be considered in these patients before the use of the EETSA.

OBJECTIVE In February 2009, the authors' center formed a team of neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists to perform pituitary surgery using the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). This paper reviews the authors' experience with the technique, pathological outcomes, hormone profiles, and postoperative complications. METHODS Between February 2009 and December 2015, 535 patients underwent the EETSA with 2-nostrils/4-hands surgery. All of the patients had preoperative neurophthalmological and endocrinological assessments and neuroimaging. Patients were followed for at least 6 months with otolaryngological evaluations. RESULTS The most common pathology treated was pituitary adenomas, with 390 (72.9%) patients. Of these, 287 (73.6%) were nonfunctioning adenomas. As the surgical method, the conventional 2-nostrils/4-hands technique was performed in 77 patients (14.4%), a right conventional nasoseptal flap and left modified nasoseptal rescue flap technique was used in 135 patients (25.2%), and bilateral modified nasoseptal rescue flaps were used in 323 patients (60.4%). Postoperative complications occurred in 46 patients (8.6%). The most common complications were vascular injury or hematoma (10 patients, 1.9%), and the most common postoperative sinonasal complaints were hyposmia or anosmia. Olfactory function was significantly decreased according to the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test (P

Objective Reconstruction of the skull base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap (NSF) seems to be advantageous after the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). A few reports have evaluated the cause of flap failure in EETSA using NSFs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative risk factors for NSF failure. Study design Patient series. Setting Retrospective review of medical records at a tertiary referral center. Methods The study population comprised patients who underwent EETSA with NSF elevation between February 2009 and March 2014. The authors retrospectively reviewed the all patients' medical records, including operative findings. Results Four hundred thirteen patients (203 males and 210 females) underwent EETSA, and 315 patients underwent EETSA with NSF elevation. The mean patient age was 48.0 years. The total number of patients of NSF failure was 6 (overall rate: 1.61%, 6/315; flap elevation: 0.31%, 1/315; flap reconstruction: 15.1%, 5/33). Two patients had diabetes mellitus. One patient had cardiovascular problems. Five patients were elderly (>60 years; mean age: 70 years). Five patients had postoperative nasal infection. One patient underwent preoperative radiation therapy. Conclusion Nasoseptal flap is a usually safe and effective technique for skull base reconstruction. However, the management of patients with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular problems, advanced age, postoperative nasal infection, and radiation therapy may require more attention to improve NSF survival.