1. Right or Wrong? Toward a Theory of IRBs' (Dis)Approval of Research.
- Author
-
Jacques, Scott and Wright, Richard
- Subjects
- *
CRIMINOLOGICAL research , *INSTITUTIONAL review boards , *SOCIOLOGY , *SOCIAL control , *CRIMINOLOGY , *FEDERAL legislation , *ETHICS , *CONFIDENTIAL communications - Abstract
No one would disagree that scientific research has been unethical—even criminal—at times. Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a fundamental role in protecting people from unethical criminological research. At the same time, IRBs, as social entities, are subject to a wide range of influences that may affect their decisions regarding the ethicality of research. This research note draws on the paradigm of pure sociology and the logic underpinning Black's theory of law to propose a preliminary theory of IRBs' (dis)approval of research. Specifically, it suggests that IRBs apply less social control to criminological research involving higher status researchers and lower status research participants and, therefore, those persons are more often involved in research. The paper concludes with theoretically situated, practical advice for how (1) IRBs can reduce their discrimination, and (2) criminological researchers can reduce IRBs' disapproval of their projects and thereby increase their research output. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF