Search

Background Despite its efficacy, rational guidance for starting/stopping first-line biologic treatment in individual paediatric Crohn’s disease [CD] patients is needed. We assessed how serum immune profiles before and after first-line infliximab [FL-IFX] or conventional [CONV] induction therapy associate with disease remission at week 52. Methods Pre- [n = 86], and 10–14-week post-treatment [n = 84] sera were collected from patients with moderate-to-severe paediatric CD in the TISKids trial, randomized to FL-IFX [n = 48; five 5-mg/kg infusions over 22 weeks] or CONV [n = 43; exclusive enteral nutrition or oral prednisolone]; both groups received azathioprine maintenance. The relative concentrations of 92 inflammatory proteins were determined with Olink Proteomics; fold changes [FC] with |log2FC| > 0.5 after false discovery rate adjustment were considered significant. Results FL-IFX modulated a larger number of inflammatory proteins and induced stronger suppression than CONV; 18/30 proteins modulated by FL-IFX were not regulated by CONV. Hierarchical clustering based on IFX-modulated proteins at baseline revealed two clusters of patients: CD-hi patients had significantly higher concentrations of 23/30 IFX-modulated proteins [including oncostatin-M, TNFSF14, HGF and TGF-α], and higher clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein and blood neutrophils at baseline than CD-lo patients. Only 24% of CD-hi FL-IFX-treated patients maintained remission without escalation at week 52 vs 58% of CD-lo FL-IFX-treated patients. Similarly, 6% of CD-hi CONV-treated patients achieved remission vs 20% of CONV-treated CD-lo patients. Clustering based on immune profiles post-induction therapy did not relate to remission at week 52. Conclusion FL-IFX leads to stronger reductions and modulates more immune proteins than CONV. Stratification on pre-treatment profiles of IFX-modulated proteins directly relates to maintenance of remission without treatment escalation. Trial registration number NCT02517684.

ObjectiveWe aimed to provide an evidence-supported update of the ECCO-ESPGHAN guideline on the medical management of paediatric Crohn’s disease [CD].MethodsWe formed 10 working groups and formulated 17 PICO-structured clinical questions [Patients, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome]. A systematic literature search from January 1, 1991 to March 19, 2019 was conducted by a medical librarian using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases. A shortlist of 30 provisional statements were further refined during a consensus meeting in Barcelona in October 2019 and subjected to a vote. In total 22 statements reached ≥ 80% agreement and were retained.ResultsWe established that it was key to identify patients at high risk of a complicated disease course at the earliest opportunity, to reduce bowel damage. Patients with perianal disease, stricturing or penetrating behaviour, or severe growth retardation should be considered for up-front anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents in combination with an immunomodulator. Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide treatment changes is recommended over empirically escalating anti-TNF dose or switching therapies. Patients with low-risk luminal CD should be induced with exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN], or with corticosteroids when EEN is not an option, and require immunomodulator-based maintenance therapy. Favourable outcomes rely on close monitoring of treatment response, with timely adjustments in therapy when treatment targets are not met. Serial faecal calprotectin measurements or small bowel imaging [ultrasound or magnetic resonance enterography] are more reliable markers of treatment response than clinical scores alone.ConclusionsWe present state-of-the-art guidance on the medical treatment and long-term management of children and adolescents with CD.

Background Transition programmes are designed to prepare adolescent inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients for transfer to adult care. It is still unclear which outcome parameters define ‘successful transition’. Therefore, this study aimed to identify outcomes important for success of transition in IBD. Methods A multinational Delphi study in patients, IBD nurses, and paediatric and adult gastroenterologists was conducted. In stage 1, panellists commented on an outcome list. In stage 2, the refined list was graded from 1 to 9 [least to very important], by an expert and a patient panel. In stage 3, the expert panel ranked important outcomes from 1 to 10 [least to most important]. Descriptive statistics and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed. Results The final item list developed in stage 1 was tested by the expert [n = 74 participants, 52.7% paediatric] and patient panel [n = 61, aged 16–25 years, 49.2% male]. Respectively, ten and 11 items were found to be important by the expert and patient panel. Both panels agreed on eight of these items, of which six reflected self-management skills. In stage 3, the expert panel formed a top-ten list. The three most important items were: decision-making regarding IBD [mean score 6.7], independent communication [mean score 6.3] and patient satisfaction [mean score 5.8]. Conclusion This is the first study identifying outcomes that IBD healthcare providers and patients deem important factors for successful transition. Self-management skills were considered more important than IBD-specific items. This is a first step to further define success of transition in IBD and subsequently evaluate the efficacy of different transition models.

Background: Vedolizumab, an anti-integrin antibody, has proven to be effective in adults with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], but the data in paediatrics are limited. We describe the short-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in a European multi-centre paediatric IBD cohort. Method: Retrospective review of children [aged 2–18 years] treated with vedolizumab from 19 centres affiliated with the Paediatric IBD Porto group of ESPGHAN. Primary outcome was Week 14 corticosteroid-free remission [CFR]. Results: In all, 64 children were included (32 [50%] male, mean age 14.5 ± 2.8 years, with a median follow-up 24 weeks [interquartile range 14–38; range 6–116]); 41 [64%] cases of ulcerative colitis/inflammatory bowel disease unclassified [UC/IBD-U] and 23 [36%] Crohn’s disease [CD]. All were previously treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] [28% primary failure, 53% secondary failure]. Week 14 CFR was 37% in UC, and 14% in CD [P = 0.06]. CFR by last follow-up was 39% in UC and 24% in CD [p = 0.24]. Ten [17%] children required surgery, six of whom had colectomy for UC. Concomitant immunomodulatory drugs did not affect remission rate [42% vs 35%; p = 0.35 at Week 22]. There were three minor drug-related adverse events. Only 3 of 16 children who underwent endoscopic evaluation had mucosal healing after treatment (19%). Conclusions: Vedolizumab was safe and effective in this cohort of paediatric refractory IBD. These data support previous findings of slow induction rate of vedolizumab in CD and a trend to be less effective compared with patients with UC.

Background In newly diagnosed paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) patients current guidelines instruct to start exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) or oral prednisolone in combination with immunomodulators to achieve remission. Infliximab (IFX) is proven to be highly effective in paediatric CD patients, but mostly used once patients are refractory, the so-called step-up (SU) treatment strategy. However, evidence is emerging IFX is more effective if initiated earlier in the disease course. We investigated whether initiation of IFX directly after diagnosis of moderate-to-severe CD, i.e. top-down (TD) treatment, results in a higher long-term remission rate compared with SU treatment. Methods For this international randomised controlled trial (RCT) patients aged 3–17 years, with new-onset, untreated CD with weighted paediatric CD activity index (wPCDAI) >40 were included. TD treatment consisted of 5 IFX (CT-P13) infusions of 5 mg/kg (0, 2, 6, 14, 22 weeks) combined with azathioprine (AZA). After 5 infusions, IFX was stopped while continuing AZA. SU treatment consisted of induction therapy with EEN or oral prednisolone combined with AZA as a maintenance treatment. In both groups, IFX could be (re)started on predefined conditions. The primary endpoint of this study was sustained clinical remission (wPCDAI Results 100 patients were included in 12 centres. Three out of 100 patients did not start with the study after randomisation (n = 97; 49 TD vs. 48 SU). At 52 weeks, 21/48 (44%) of TD patients were in clinical remission without a need for treatment intensification or surgery, while in the SU group this number was significantly lower (8/48, p = 0.004). After induction therapy, IFX was (re)started in 19/49 (39%) TD patients compared with 30/48 (62%) SU patients within 52 weeks (p = 0.019). At week 10, significantly more TD (27/44, 61%) than SU treated patients (17/44, 39%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.033). Fifty-seven of 97 consented to endoscopy at week 10. Endoscopic remission rates were higher in TD (16/27 [59%], median SES-CD 1 [IQR 0–5]) than SU treated patients (5/30 [17%], median SES-CD 6 [IQR 3–16], p = 0.001). Similarly, low faecal calprotectin levels were more frequent in the TD group (n = 75; TD 21/40 [53%] vs. SU 9/35 [26%], p = 0.027). Conclusion We are the first to compare TD IFX to SU treatment in an RCT of paediatric CD patients. TD treatment was superior to SU in achieving sustained clinical remission. Therefore, we advise to start IFX directly after diagnosis in moderate-to-severe paediatric Crohn’s disease patients.

Background and aims: Methotrexate [MTX] is an immunomodulating drug that can be used to maintain remission in patients with Crohn's disease [CD], but data on efficacy and tolerability in children and teenagers are scarce. We evaluated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of MTX monotherapy after thiopurine therapy in paediatric CD patients.Methods: A multicenter cohort of paediatric MTX users who stopped thiopurines due to ineffectiveness or intolerance between 2002 and 2012 were included and followed for at least 12 months. Relapse-free use was defined as steroid and biologics-free clinical remission after the introduction of MTX, and included intentional discontinuation of successful therapy before the end of the observation period.Results: A total of 113 patients with CD in remission were followed while on MTX monotherapy, of whom 75 [66%] had failed on thiopurines and 38 [34%] had stopped thiopurines due to side effects. Median age at the introduction of MTX was 14 years [range 7 to 17], and 93% used the subcutaneous route. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 52% of the study cohort were still in steroid-and biologics-free remission after 12 months of MTX monotherapy, with a difference that did not reach significance between thiopurine-intolerant and thiopurine-failing patients [p = 0.21, log-rank test].Conclusions: The findings of this cohort study suggest that MTX is an effective immunomodulator to maintain remission after stopping thiopurines. MTX maintenance should be considered before stepping up to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. MTX is probably somewhat more effective in patients who stopped thiopurines due to side effects than in those who failed on thiopurines.