1. P352 A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn’s disease. The Cross Pennine study II
- Author
-
C. Kenneth, Jimmy K. Limdi, Simon Borg-Bartolo, F Fairhurst, S. Tattersall, D Byrne, R Walker, V Dolby, J Taylor, Karen Kemp, Daniel Storey, S Subramanian, Arash Assadsangabi, Christian P. Selinger, Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Philip J Smith, Catherine Stansfield, V. Hall, A. De Silvestri, Tristan Townsend, and Tanya Clark
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Crohn's disease ,Second line treatment ,Tumor necrosis factors ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Treatment failure ,Vedolizumab ,Internal medicine ,Ustekinumab ,Propensity score matching ,medicine ,Adverse effect ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background The best choice of biological agents after failure to an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α agent in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) is yet to be defined. Real-world data dealing with this issue are still emerging. Methods This is a multicentre retrospective study including eight UK hospitals (August 2014-April 2020). We retrospectively collected data of patients treated with ustekinumab. Clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks evaluated through Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and adverse events were recorded. Predictors of clinical response were examined, and a propensity score-matched analysis with a cohort of patients treated with vedolizumab was performed. Results Overall, 282 patients (mean age 40±15, F:M ratio 1.7:1) treated with ustekinumab were included. Clinical response or remission was reached by 200/282 patients (70.9%) at 14 weeks, and by 162/259 patients (62.5%) at 52 weeks. The most common reason for discontinuation was either primary failure or loss of response, followed by the occurrence of adverse events and by the need for surgery. The rate of non-adherence was rather low (1.4%). Current smoking (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.13-5.44; p=0.02), baseline PGA (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.55-3.69, p Conclusion Ustekinumab was effective and well tolerated in this real-world cohort. While ustekinumab proved more effective at 14-week follow-up, we found no statistically significant differences in outcomes at 52 weeks.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF