Search

Background: PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) is a promising immunohistochemical marker in distinguishing benign from malignant primary cutaneous melanocytic lesions and lymph node deposits. We hypothesize that PRAME may also reliably identify melanoma metastases that are clinically detected in skin, lymph nodes, or small intestine. Methods: A total of 155 cases of metastatic melanoma to lymph node (N = 54) and non‐lymph node (N = 101) sites were stained with an antibody against PRAME. Nuclear expression was scored in tumor cells as negative, 1% to 25% (1+), 26% to 50% (2+), 51% to 75% (3+), or 76% to 100% (4+). Results: PRAME expression was seen in 151/155 (97.4%) cases, with 4+ expression in 64 cases (41.3%), 3+ expression in 46 cases (29.7%), 2+ expression in 18 cases (11.6%), and 1+ expression in 23 cases (14.8%). Lymph node metastases were more likely to show lower expression as compared to metastases to other anatomic sites (P = 0.003). Conclusions: A high level of PRAME immunoreactivity was identified in this cohort of metastatic melanoma. Lymph node metastases showed more focal or absent PRAME expression as compared to metastases to other sites. Overall, PRAME is a useful tool for confirming the diagnosis of melanoma in a metastatic setting, in both nodal and visceral deposits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The delineation of radial and vertical growth phases in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas has contributed to our understanding of melanoma progression and has enhanced the ability of pathologists to provide clinicians with meaningful prognostic information. Vertical growth phase (VGP) lesions have the potential to metastasize, but radial growth phase (RGP) melanomas are believed to lack competence for metastasis. Methods: We have identified three cases in which metastasis occurred in association with lesions initially interpreted as RGP melanomas. To determine whether these cases truly represented exceptional metastasizing RGP melanomas or VGP lesions incorrectly identified as RGP lesions, careful microscopic re-review of these cases was performed. Results: In one case, additional microscopic sectioning revealed a focus of vertical growth that was not evident on the original sections. In the other two cases, only radial growth was found. In one of these cases there was melanoma in situ with regressive changes, but no evidence for invasive melanoma. In the other, a RGP lesion was associated with an adjacent compound nevus with periadnexal involvement. Conclusions: These cases suggest that, while true RGP melanomas have an excellent prognosis, caution must be exercised in defining a lesion as having no metastatic potential when multiple sections of the primary lesion are unavailable, when the lesion is accompanied by regressive changes, or when there is an associated melanocytic nevus. It is possible that strictly defined RGP melanomas may metastasize in very rare cases. Our observations also suggest that metastatic potential is a function of numerous factors, and may not be evaluable on morphological grounds alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is disagreement about the behavior and optimal management of desmoplastic melanoma (DM), particularly regarding the incidence of lymph node (LN) involvement. Recently, investigators have noted the frequently heterogenous histologic composition of DM and have found significant differences between pure desmoplastic melanoma (PDM) (≥90% comprised of histologically typical DM) and mixed desmoplastic melanoma (MDM) [≥10% DM and >10% conventional melanoma (CM)]. Method: We reviewed 87 cases of DM comparing the histologic and clinical features of PDM (n = 44) to MDM (n = 43). Results: At surgical staging, there were LN metastases in 5 of 23 (22%) MDM patients, whereas all 17 PDM patients had negative LN biopsies (0%) (p = 0.04). PDM was less often clinically pigmented (36% vs. 67%) and had a lower mean mitotic index (1.3 vs. 3.0). Conclusions: There are differences between PDM and MDM, the most important of which is the incidence of LN involvement. Our findings support the clinical utility of classifying DM into pure and mixed subtypes because the negligible rate of nodal involvement in PDM does not support the routine performance of sentinel LN biopsy in this subgroup of melanoma patients. In contrast, the incidence of LN involvement in MDM is comparable to that of CM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Successful management of epithelial skin cancers with imiquimod 5% cream (Aldara®), an immunomodulatory agent, led to speculation that it may promote an immune response against melanoma. Studies, mostly case reports, have assessed the value of imiquimod as a topical treatment for dermal melanoma metastases that prove difficult to manage surgically. The precise value of imiquimod, however, in treatment of dermal and subcutaneous metastases remains unclear. A case at our institution elucidates histopathologically that subcutaneous metastases may progress despite excellent treatment of superficial dermis in the same location. In preparation for a clinical trial using imiquimod to treat patients with dermal melanoma metastases, we have treated several patients off protocol. We present a case report in which the observed changes are documented photographically and histologically. The patient experienced dramatic improvement in the locally treated dermis with concurrent regional treatment failure in the subcutaneous space. Our experience supports growing evidence that imiquimod for some provides an effective option for dermal disease. The unique histological documentation we provide regarding the differential effectiveness of imiquimod in treating various tissue components may help guide future investigations regarding optimal clinical application of imiquimod therapy for melanoma metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]