Search

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of once-daily milking on the welfare of dairy cows in a pastoral-based farming system. There are concerns that cows milked only once daily may experience discomfort associated with udder distension. We evaluated the behavior, including lying time and postures, grazing patterns, and kicking behavior in the parlor, and measures of udder firmness in cows milked once daily in 2 experiments: 1) at peak lactation, comparing cows milked once (1x) or twice-daily (2x) from the time of calving (n = 4 groups; 1x and 2x treatments); and 2) during the transition from 2x to 1x milking at mid lactation (n = 12 groups; 1x, 2x, and 2x to lx treatments or TRANS). At peak lactation, cows milked 1x were more likely to lie with their hind legs touching the body than cows milked 2x. There were no differences in udder firmness (1x: 10.0 vs. 2x: 9.9 ± 0.13 g of force) or kicking (1x: 25 vs. 2x: 24 ± 7.8%) behavior in the parlor. In the second experiment, milking frequency was reduced from 2x to 1x and this change resulted in an increase in udder firmness (1x: 9.1, 2x: 9.3, and TRANS: 9.5 ± 0.14 g of force). Despite these differences in udder firmness, lying time (1x: 10.1, 2x: 9.5, and TRANS: 9.6 ± 0.38 h/24 h), postures, and concentrations of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (1x: 10.0, 2x: 10.5, and TRANS: 10.4 ± 0.49 ng/g of feces in the 3 d after transition) in cows milked 1x or 2x were similar. Although milking frequency did not influence total time spent grazing, the diurnal grazing pattern of cows milked 2x was disrupted by afternoon milking at both peak and mid lactation. Cows milked 2x were able to compensate for this by grazing more after the return to pasture (DIM 153 to 155, 1x: 52 vs. 2x: 66 ± 6.2 min/90 min of grazing). Cows milked 1x had slightly longer strides than 2x cows at mid lactation (1x: 0.73, 2x: 0.70, and TRANS: 0.70 ± 0.014 strides/ m). In conclusion, under our experimental conditions, we found no overt changes in behavior or physiology to indicate that the welfare of cows milked 1x is impaired. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effects of milking cows once daily throughout lactation at high stocking rates (17% more cows/ha than for those milked twice daily) were studied in 2 Friesian and 2 Jersey herds during 3 lactations. Cows were allocated to 2 herds within breed and were milked either once or twice daily, based on age, genetic merit, and previous performance. Cows remained in their original herd and were milked at the same milking frequency during all lactations. Culled cows (20% per year) were replaced by 2-yr-old heifers. Yields of milk, lactose, protein, and fat were measured every 2 wk by commercial herd test. Cubic splines (5 knots) were used to approximate the lactation curve for each cow-yr to provide estimates of performance for each day of lactation. Yields of milk were greater for Friesian and Jersey cows milked twice daily (4,751 ± 89 and 3,067 ± 81 kg/cow) than for cows milked once daily (3,329 ± 80 and 2,431 ± 75 kg/cow), respectively. Cows milked once daily had lesser total and peak yields of milk, lactose, protein, and fat than cows milked twice daily. Friesians had greater total and peak yields than Jerseys. Peak production for all milk components occurred earlier in lactation for cows milked once daily than twice daily (d 24 to 39 vs. 32 to 44). Three measures of persistency of lactation were considered for each cow with 2 measures (Pers1 and Pers2) indicating that cows milked twice daily had better persistency than those milked once daily. Ranking of herds in persistency tended to match the ranking based on total yields. Measures of persistency (Pers1 and Pers2) were positively related to total yield in the Jerseys milked once daily and negatively related to peak yield in the Friesians. The third persistency measure (Pers3) ranked once-daily Jerseys first and twice-daily Friesians last, and was negatively correlated with total yield in the Friesian herds and negatively correlated with peak yield in all herds. For most performance measures, cows milked twice daily had better total yields and persistency than cows milked once daily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of milking frequency (once vs. twice-daily milking) and breed (Holstein-Friesians vs. Jerseys) on milk and milk solids (MS; milk fat + milk protein), yield per cow, milk composition, somatic cell count and lactation length; cow body weight, body condition score, and reproductive performance over a 4-yr period. Total cow numbers in each herd were 30, 35, 36, and 42 for Holstein-Friesians milked once or twice daily, and Jerseys milked once or twice daily, respectively. Forty hectares of pasture were subdivided into 4 smaller pastures of 10 ha each. Stocking rates for the once-daily herds were 16.7% greater than the twice-daily herd in their respective breed. An increased stocking rate was chosen to achieve equal milk and MS per ha from the 2 milking frequencies. Annual milk, fat, protein, and lactose yields per cow were less for once-daily than for twice-daily milking. Interactions were detected between milking frequency and breed for annual milk, fat, protein, and lactose yields per cow, because Jerseys were relatively less affected by once-daily than by twice-daily milking than Holstein-Friesians. Holstein-Friesian cows milked once daily produced 31.2% less milk and 29.4% less MS per cow than their twice-daily counterparts. In contrast, Jersey cows milked once daily produced 22.1% less milk and 19.9% less MS per cow than their twice-daily counterparts. Milk per ha was 17.7 and 9% less for the once-daily Holstein-Friesians and once-daily Jersey herds, respectively, compared with their twice-daily counterparts, because the greater stocking rate for the once-daily herds did not fully compensate for the milk loss per cow. Milking once daily increased somatic cell count throughout the year in both breeds. Cows milked once daily conceived 3 d earlier, took 5 d less from calving to conception, and needed 11% fewer controlled internal drug release devices than those milked twice daily. Milking once daily is a viable milking option for New Zealand farmers who are prepared to trade-off loss of MS income for increased time to accomplish other nonmilking activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of its high yield and the ability of cows to graze it in situ, fodder beet (FB) has become a popular crop in grazing systems, particularly for nonlactating cows. Due to its high sugar content, however, the transition to FB must be managed carefully to avoid rumen acidosis and associated metabolic dysfunction. The initial consumption of FB reduces ruminal pH; however, it is unclear whether this affects liver metabolism and results in systemic inflammation, as has been reported during subacute ruminal acidosis from high-grain diets. We used a quantitative case study approach to undertake additional measurements on a project demonstrating the effects of FB on urinary nitrogen excretion. The objective of our component, therefore, was to determine whether the inclusion of high rates of FB in the diet of nonlactating cows changed indicators of hepatic metabolism relative to a standard diet for nonlactating grazing cows. During the nonlactating period, multiparous, pregnant Holstein-Friesian cows were randomly assigned (n = 15 per treatment) to either pasture (8 kg of DM/cow per day) with corn silage (4 kg of DM/cow per day; PA) or transitioning onto an FB diet (8 kg of DM/cow per day) with pasture silage (4 kg of DM/cow per day; BT) over 14 d. Blood was sampled and the liver was biopsied during the adaptation period and after 7 d of full diet allocation. The hepatic expression of genes involved in peroxisomal oxidation was increased in cows adapting to FB, whereas the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial oxidation was increased when cows were on their full allocation of FB. These results indicate changes to fatty acid metabolism with FB consumption. Expression of 2 genes involved in the unfolded protein response was greater during the adaptation period in cows consuming FB, potentially reflecting negative effects of transitioning onto the FB diet on hepatic metabolism. Interestingly, expression of genes involved in the methionine cycle was increased in the BT cows. We hypothesize that this is a result of FB betaine absorption, although it is unclear to what extent betaine escapes ruminal degradation. While on the full diet allocation, there were lower serum concentrations of markers of hepatic stress in BT cows and no difference in expression of genes involved in oxidative stress compared with pasture-fed cows. However, there was an increase in plasma haptoglobin concentrations, indicative of an acute inflammatory response in BT cows. From this case study, we conclude that the results indicate no negative effects of the FB diet on liver metabolism and, possibly, positive effects on hepatic function. It appears, therefore, that the transition of nonlactating cows onto an FB diet can be managed to minimize the negative effects of the high sugar intake. Further research on the amount of betaine that escapes ruminal degradation in cows consuming FB would be of value to better understand whether betaine reduces liver damage in dairy cows consuming FB., (Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)