Search

Neutrophil-related chronic inflammation (NRCI) may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We evaluated whether blocking NRCI with low-dose colchicine prevents DKD.A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted. A total of 160 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin creatinine ratio [UACR] 30 to 300 mg/g Cr) who received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for at least 3 months were included. Subjects were 1:1 randomized to a placebo or colchicine group (0.5 mg/day).The primary end point was the incidence of overt nephropathy (UACR 300 mg/g Cr). During the 36 months, 38 patients (51.4%) in colchicine group and 39 (54.1%) in the control group developed overt nephropathy (hazard ratio, 1.066; 95% confidence interval, 0.679-1.673; P = .78). Compared with placebo, colchicine modestly lowered levels of NRCI parameters (P values.05 for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), whereas the changes of UACR and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in drug-related adverse events, including infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, and limb numbness.In patients with T2D with microalbuminuria, low-dose colchicine effectively and safely lowered NRCI but did not prevent the incidence of overt nephropathy.背景: 中性粒细胞相关性慢性炎症(NRCI)可能与糖尿病肾病(DKD)的发生有关。我们用低剂量秋水仙碱抑制NRCI并评估其是否能延缓DKD的发生。 方法: 本研究为一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。研究共纳入2型糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿(肌酐比 [UACR] 30-300mg/g Cr)的患者共160名, 所有患者均接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ARBs)类药物至少3个月。患者按1:1随机分为安慰剂组或秋水仙碱组(接受秋水仙碱0.5mg/d)。 结果: 本研究的主要终点为显著肾病(UACR300mg/g Cr)的发生率。在随访的36个月中, 秋水仙碱组的38名患者(51.4%)以及安慰剂组的39名患者(54.1%)发展成为了显著肾病(危险比1.066; 95%置信区间 0.679-1.673; p=0.78)。秋水仙碱组与安慰剂组相比, NRCI水平有所下降(高灵敏C-反应蛋白、白细胞总数、中性粒细胞总数、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值等指标, 两组有显著性差异, p0.05), 但两组的UACR变化率、估算肾小球滤过率变化率无显著差异。两组的药物相关不良反应, 包括感染、胃肠道症状、肢体麻木等症状无显著差异。 结论: 在2型糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿的患者中, 低剂量秋水仙碱能有效且安全地降低NRCI, 但是不能延缓DKD的发生。.

Background The aim of the present study was to investigate the combined effects of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and sex hormones on the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods A nested case-control study of Chinese participants in the Environment, Inflammation and Metabolic Diseases Study (2008–13) was performed. Of the 3510 subjects free of diabetes, 145 men and 87 women developed diabetes over the 5-year follow-up. One age- and sex-matched control subject was selected for each case. Baseline concentrations of SHBG, estradiol, testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were divided into tertiles and subjects were classified as having low, intermediate and high levels accordingly. Results After multivariate adjustment, men with low SHBG levels had a fourfold greater risk of T2D than men with high SHBG levels. Conversely, men with high estradiol levels had a fourfold greater risk of T2D than men with low estradiol levels. Men with low SHBG + high estradiol had a 20-fold greater risk of T2D than men with high SHBG + low estradiol (odds ratio [OR] 20.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.62–51.33). These risk associations in men were not observed for testosterone or DHEA-S, alone or in combination with SHBG. Compared with low SHBG, the risk of T2D decreased with increasing SHBG tertile (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.21–4.53], 0.14 [95% CI 0.10–0.74]; Ptrend = 0.043) after multivariate adjustment in women. Estradiol, testosterone, and DHEA-S levels showed no association with T2D in women. Conclusion Low SHBG in conjunction with high estradiol has an additive detrimental effect on the risk of T2D in men.

Background Cross-sectional studies have reported a close association between serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and many metabolic disorders. However, no longitudinal study has explored the relationship between LBP and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between serum LBP levels and the risk of developing T2DM. Methods A 5-year nested case-control study of 3510 individuals was performed as part of the Environment, Inflammation and Metabolic Diseases Study (EIMDS). Clinical data were collected at baseline. Serum levels of LBP and other biochemical factors, such as insulin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, were detected 5 years later. Subjects were diagnosed as having T2DM on the basis of results of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and 1998 World Health Organization criteria. Controls were randomly selected to match cases according to age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) in a 1:1 ratio. Odds ratios (OR) for T2DM were calculated using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results Over a 5-year follow-up period, 255 subjects developed T2DM. There was no significant difference in serum LBP levels between the T2DM and control groups at baseline (19.78 ± 6.40 versus 20.53 ± 6.99 μg/mL; P = 0.207). Subjects were divided into three groups based on tertiles of LBP concentrations (n = 170 in each group; T1 = 1.31–17.16 μg/mL LBP; T2 = 17.21–22.37 μg/mL LBP; T3 = 22.49–40.08 μg/mL LBP). There was no significant association between the risk of developing T2DM and any of the LBP tertiles in either a simple model or after adjusting for general status and biochemical factors. Conclusion After matching for gender, age, and BMI, LBP does not improve prediction of the development of T2DM independently.

Background Insulin therapy should be strongly considered in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with severe hyperglycemia. However, whether insulin be continued or patients switched to an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) after short-term intensive insulin therapy (ITT) is not clear. Methods After ITT for 10–14 days, 47 patients were randomized into either a glargine (n = 21) or metformin-based OAD (n = 26) group for a 6-month intervention. After these 6 months, patients in the glargine group were switched to metformin-based OAD therapy, whereas treatment in the OAD group was unchanged. Patients were followed-up for another 6 months. Results At the end of the 6-month intervention, HbA1c was similarly reduced in both the glargine (from 11.81 ± 1.70% to 6.48 ± 0.79%; P

The aim of the present study was to investigate the combined effects of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and sex hormones on the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).A nested case-control study of Chinese participants in the Environment, Inflammation and Metabolic Diseases Study (2008-13) was performed. Of the 3510 subjects free of diabetes, 145 men and 87 women developed diabetes over the 5-year follow-up. One age- and sex-matched control subject was selected for each case. Baseline concentrations of SHBG, estradiol, testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were divided into tertiles and subjects were classified as having low, intermediate and high levels accordingly.After multivariate adjustment, men with low SHBG levels had a fourfold greater risk of T2D than men with high SHBG levels. Conversely, men with high estradiol levels had a fourfold greater risk of T2D than men with low estradiol levels. Men with low SHBG + high estradiol had a 20-fold greater risk of T2D than men with high SHBG + low estradiol (odds ratio [OR] 20.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.62-51.33). These risk associations in men were not observed for testosterone or DHEA-S, alone or in combination with SHBG. Compared with low SHBG, the risk of T2D decreased with increasing SHBG tertile (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.21-4.53], 0.14 [95% CI 0.10-0.74]; Ptrend = 0.043) after multivariate adjustment in women. Estradiol, testosterone, and DHEA-S levels showed no association with T2D in women.Low SHBG in conjunction with high estradiol has an additive detrimental effect on the risk of T2D in men.

Cross-sectional studies have reported a close association between serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and many metabolic disorders. However, no longitudinal study has explored the relationship between LBP and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between serum LBP levels and the risk of developing T2DM.A 5-year nested case-control study of 3510 individuals was performed as part of the Environment, Inflammation and Metabolic Diseases Study (EIMDS). Clinical data were collected at baseline. Serum levels of LBP and other biochemical factors, such as insulin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, were detected 5 years later. Subjects were diagnosed as having T2DM on the basis of results of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and 1998 World Health Organization criteria. Controls were randomly selected to match cases according to age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) in a 1:1 ratio. Odds ratios (OR) for T2DM were calculated using conditional logistic regression analysis.Over a 5-year follow-up period, 255 subjects developed T2DM. There was no significant difference in serum LBP levels between the T2DM and control groups at baseline (19.78 ± 6.40 versus 20.53 ± 6.99 μg/mL; P = 0.207). Subjects were divided into three groups based on tertiles of LBP concentrations (n = 170 in each group; T1 = 1.31-17.16 μg/mL LBP; T2 = 17.21-22.37 μg/mL LBP; T3 = 22.49-40.08 μg/mL LBP). There was no significant association between the risk of developing T2DM and any of the LBP tertiles in either a simple model or after adjusting for general status and biochemical factors.After matching for gender, age, and BMI, LBP does not improve prediction of the development of T2DM independently.

Insulin therapy should be strongly considered in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with severe hyperglycemia. However, whether insulin be continued or patients switched to an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) after short-term intensive insulin therapy (ITT) is not clear.After ITT for 10-14 days, 47 patients were randomized into either a glargine (n = 21) or metformin-based OAD (n = 26) group for a 6-month intervention. After these 6 months, patients in the glargine group were switched to metformin-based OAD therapy, whereas treatment in the OAD group was unchanged. Patients were followed-up for another 6 months.At the end of the 6-month intervention, HbA1c was similarly reduced in both the glargine (from 11.81 ± 1.70% to 6.48 ± 0.79%; P 0.001) and OAD (from 11.71 ± 1.89% to 6.16 ± 0.52%; P 0.001) groups. At the end of 12 months, HbA1c was at comparable and near optimal levels in both groups. Similar increases were seen in homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function in the two groups after 6 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in insulin sensitivity improvement, hypoglycemic episodes, weight change, treatment satisfaction and quality of life after the 6-month intervention.The effects of metformin-based OAD therapy on glycemic control and improvements in β-cell function are not inferior to glargine in newly diagnosed T2D patients with severe hyperglycemia after short-term ITT. Considering the superiority of metformin in terms of safety, cost, and convenience, metformin-based OAD therapy is strongly recommended for these patients.