Search

Objective: Surgicel (Fibrillar), i.e. oxidized regenerated cellulose, is used to control oozing bleeding after surgery, but few studies have assessed its effect on complications after endoscopic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Surgicel for preventing bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric epithelial tumors. Methods: From November 2012 to December 2013 patients scheduled for ESD of gastric epithelial tumors were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were assigned randomly to monotherapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (the MT group) or combination therapy with Surgicel and histamine‐2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (the CT group) for preventing bleeding after ESD. Major bleeding rates and changes in hemoglobin at 1 and 7 days after ESD were evaluated. Results: Among the 157 patients enrolled (111 men, 46 women), 78 were assigned to the MT group and 79 to the CT group; finally, 72 and 74 patients were included in the MT and CT groups. The major bleeding rate was lower in the CT group (6/74, 8.1%) than in the MT group (12/72, 16.7%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.354). The change in hemoglobin was significantly less marked in the CT group than the MT group 1 day after ESD ([−6.2 ± 9.0] g/L vs [−8.9 ± 6.2] g/L, P = 0.045). Conclusions: Combination therapy with Surgicel and an H2RA decreased the rate of bleeding similarly to PPI. Adding Surgicel to H2RA could be considered for patients with bleeding tendencies, or who require continuous antiplatelet therapy to prevent bleeding after ESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Acquiring adequate tissue for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis is important in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial tumors (SETs). In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic yield based on IHC analysis between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) after on-site cytological evaluation for cellularity in gastric SETs. Methods In 22 patients with gastric SETs, EUS-guided tissue sampling was performed on the same SET in a randomized sequence, with EUS-FNA followed by EUS-FNB, or vice versa. After on-site cytological evaluation for cellularity, the cytological and histological examinations were performed. Results There was a significant difference in the median number of needle passes to obtain adequate cellularity in the on-site cytological evaluation (2.0 for EUS-FNA vs 1.0 for EUS-FNB, P = 0.008). The proportion of adequate cellularity on the first needle pass was significantly higher in the EUS-FNB than in the EUS-FNA group (68.2% vs 31.8%, P = 0.034). However, diagnosis based on IHC examination was established in 15 (68.2%) and 18 (81.8%) cases by EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, respectively ( P = 0.488). Conclusions EUS-FNB decreases the number of needle passes to obtain adequate cellularity and yields a higher proportion of adequate cellularity during the first needle pass compared with EUS-FNA in gastric SETs. However, there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield with IHC stain between the two procedures after on-site cytological evaluation for adequate cellularity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]