Search

Background and Purpose: The study compared characteristics and outcomes in patients with solitary and bilateral kidneys who were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study. Patients and Methods: Data from consecutively treated patients from 96 centers worldwide were collated after a 1-year period. The following variables in patients undergoing PCNL with solitary or bilateral kidneys were compared: Prevalence, patient characteristics, intraoperative differences and outcomes, including bleeding and transfusion rates, renal function, and stone-free rates. Results: Data from 5803 patients were collated; 189 (3.3%) with solitary and 5556 (96.7%) with bilateral kidneys. Patient characteristics were well matched generally with the exception of cardiovascular disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk scores, which were significantly greater in patients with solitary than with bilateral kidneys (P

To compare the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach in the laparoscopic management of ureteral stones, at two different urologic centers during the learning curve period.We prospectively evaluated 35 consecutive laparoscopic ureterolithotomies performed by two different urologists during their learning curve period in laparoscopy. Each surgeon used a different approach: Transperitoneal (group A) and retroperitoneal (group B). Timing for patients' positioning, trocar placement, ureter isolation, stone extraction, and suturing were recorded to compare the transperitoneal with the retroperitoneal method. Intraoperative complications and perioperative morbidity were also reported.Eighteen procedures were performed using the transperitoneal method (group A) and 17 using the retroperitoneal method (group B). Significant differences between group A and B were observed in terms of time for access to the operating field (mean times 14 and 24 min, respectively, P =0.001); time for suturing the ureter (mean times 16 and 28 min, respectively, P =0.001); and total operative time (mean times 75 and 102 min, respectively, P = 0.002). No statistical differences were observed for any other parameters. Blood loss was minimal in all cases (mean losses 50 and 45 mL, respectively, P = 0.852); and hemotransfusion was not needed by either group. At the 12-month follow-up, no cases of ureteral stricture were recorded.We suggest that urologists in training for laparoscopy perform laparoscopic ureterolithotomy using a transperitoneal route. In expert hands, both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches are feasible, and the choice depends on personal preference.