Search

In regard to the risk of stent obstruction, there are persistent controversies concerning the use of the Wallstent self-expandable metal stents in the ureter. Only a few clinical trials have been published to date, and, from a technical point of view, no success predictors have been identified. In an experimental study using a pig model, we have shown that neither the length of the stent (5 or 10 cm) nor an initial 1-month intubation had any influence on the outcome of the stents. Among the eight implantations studied (four 5-cm and four 10-cm stents), only one 5-cm stent was perfectly patent at 35 days. In all the remaining stents, after 35 or 90 days, constant failure was related to distal narrowing at the edge of the stent, with no difference between the 5- and 10-cm stents or between the intubated and the nonintubated stents. This distal narrowing, probably attributable to a functional discrepancy between an adynamic stented ureter and a normal underlying ureter, demands extreme caution in human applications when the ureter is normally peristaltic.

Four techniques of intracorporeal lithotripsy are now available: ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic, and laser. Their therapeutic efficacies have generally been evaluated and compared, but very few data have been available on their relative risks of iatrogenic trauma to the urothelial wall. We conducted a comparative analysis of this risk by testing the pig ureteral and bladder wall with the EMS Lithoclast, Olympus ultrasonic lithotripter, Walz Lithotron EL 23, and Versa Pulse Ho:YAG Coherent Laser. We measured the number of shockwaves or the energy required to perforate the ureter and bladder by delivering shocks perpendicular to the walls. Ureteral perforation was impossible with the 1.0-mm Lithoclast transducer and the 1.5-mm ultrasound transducer. Perforation was induced after 250 shocks with the 0.8-mm Lithoclast transducer, after 110 shocks with the 3F electrohydraulic electrode, and after 0.02 kJ with the laser. Bladder perforation was impossible with the 2.0-mm Lithoclast device and the 3.4-mm ultrasound transducer but was induced after 0.04 kJ had been delivered with the laser. We evaluated the iatrogenic risk under normal conditions of use by delivering the shocks tangentially to the ureteral wall and perpendicular to the bladder wall. We sacrificed animals on days 0, 1, and 6. The immediate histologic lesions induced by the Lithoclast and the ultrasound lithotripter were similar, consisting of a moderate reduction of the epithelial layers or intraepithelial detachments. Electrohydraulic shocks induced almost complete abrasion of the urothelium, and the laser induced extensive lesions of partial or complete necrosis of the urothelial wall.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)