Search

Introduction: While the operator radiation dose rates are correlated to patient radiation dose rates, discrepancies may exist in the effect size of each individual radiation dose predictors. An operator dose rate prediction model was developed, compared with the patient dose rate prediction model, and converted to an instant operator risk chart. Materials and Methods: The radiation dose rates (DRoperator for the operator and DRpatient for the patient) from 12,865 abdomen X-ray acquisitions were selected from 50 unique patients undergoing standard or complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the hybrid operating room with a fixed C-arm. The radiation dose rates were analyzed using a log-linear multivariable mixed model (with the patient as the random effect) and incorporated varying (patient and C-arm) radiation dose predictors combined with the vascular access site. The operator dose rate models were used to predict the expected radiation exposure duration until an operator may be at risk to reach the 20 mSv year dose limit. The dose rate prediction models were translated into an instant operator radiation risk chart. Results: In the multivariate patient and operator fluoroscopy dose rate models, lower DRoperator than DRpatient effect size was found for radiation protocol (2.06 for patient vs 1.4 for operator changing from low to medium protocol) and C-arm angulation. Comparable effect sizes for both DRoperator and DRpatient were found for body mass index (1.25 for patient and 1.27 for the operator) and irradiated field. A higher effect size for the DRoperator than DRpatient was found for C-arm rotation (1.24 for the patient vs 1.69 for the operator) and exchanging from femoral access site to brachial access (1.05 for patient vs 2.5 for the operator). Operators may reach their yearly 20 mSv year dose limit after 941 minutes from the femoral access vs 358 minutes of digital subtraction angiography radiation from the brachial access. Conclusion: The operator dose rates were correlated to patient dose rate; however, C-arm angulation and changing from femoral to brachial vascular access site may disproportionally increase the operator radiation risk compared with the patient radiation risk. An instant risk chart may improve operator dose awareness during EVAR.

Purpose: To quantify both pulsatile longitudinal and circumferential aortic strains before and after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), potentially clarifying TEVAR-related complications. Methods: This retrospective study assessed the impact of TEVAR on pulsatile aortic strains through custom developed software and cardiac-gated computed tomography imaging of 8 thoracic aneurysm patients (mean age 71.0±8.2 years; 6 men) performed before TEVAR and during follow-up (median 0.1 months, interquartile range 0.1–5.8). Lengths of the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and the descending aorta were measured. Diameters and areas were computed at the sinotubular junction, brachiocephalic trunk, left subclavian artery, and the celiac trunk. Pulsatile longitudinal and circumferential strains were quantified as systolic increments of length and circumference divided by the corresponding diastolic values. Results: Average pulsatile longitudinal strain ranged from 1.4% to 7.1%, was highest in the arch (p

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of the Zenith ZBIS iliac branch device (IBD) to preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion in a large Dutch multicenter cohort. Methods: Between September 2004 and August 2015, 140 patients (mean age 70.9 +/- 7.4 years; 130 men) with 162 IBD implantations were identified in 7 vascular centers. The indication for IBD implantation was an abdominal aortic aneurysm > 55 mm with a concomitant common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysm > 20 mm (n=40), a CIA aneurysm with a diameter > 30 mm (n=89), or revision of a type Ib endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (n=11). Results: Technical success (aneurysm exclusion, no type I or III endoleak, and a patent IIA) was obtained in 157 (96.9%) of 162 IBD implantations. Six (4.3%) patients developed major complications; 2 (1.4%) died. Mean follow-up was 26.6 +/- 24.1 months, during which 17 (12.1%) IBD-associated secondary interventions were performed. Including technical failures and intentional IIA embolizations, 15 (9.3%) IIA branch occlusions were identified; buttock claudication developed in 6 of these patients. The freedom from secondary intervention estimate was 75.9% (95% confidence interval 59.7 to 86.3) at 5 years. Conclusion: CIA aneurysms can be treated safely and effectively by IBDs with preservation of antegrade flow to the IIA. Secondary interventions are indicated in > 10% of patients during follow-up but can be performed endovascularly in most.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction with the Allura ClarityIQ image processing technology for fixed C-arms in comparison with a mobile C-arm and an Allura fixed C-arm without ClarityIQ technology during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. Methods: Radiation dose data from 85 patients (mean age 74.2±7.8 years; 68 men) undergoing EVAR with mobile and fixed C-arm fluoroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation dose parameters included the kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopic time (FT), and number of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) frames (FrDSA). KAPtotal consisted of KAPfluoro (KAP for fluoroscopic imaging) and KAPDSA (KAP for DSA and single shots). Linear regression analysis was used to explore differences in the association of KAP with the FT, FrDSA, and body mass index (BMI) among the 3 C-arms. Results: The mean KAPtotal values for mobile, Allura C-arm, and AlluraClarity C-arm for noncomplex EVARs were 56±39, 245±142, and 157±120 Gy·cm2 (p2 (pfluoro tripled when the mobile C-arm was replaced by the fixed C-arm. There were no significant differences in the KAPfluoro adjusted for the FT between Allura and AlluraClarity (p=0.69). However, there was a major 61% reduction in KAPDSA from 1.36 Gy·cm2 per DSA frame for Allura to 0.54 Gy·cm2 per DSA frame with AlluraClarity (p=0.03). For the mobile C-arm, BMI was not associated with KAP (p=0.13). The associations of BMI with KAPfluoro and KAPDSA were significant for both fixed C-arms but were more robust for Allura compared to AlluraClarity (p=0.02 for KAPfluoro and pDSA). Conclusion: Changing a mobile C-arm for a fixed C-arm in a hybrid operating suite increased the average intraoperative dose during EVAR. Upgrading the Allura fixed C-arm with ClarityIQ technology resulted in a 61% reduction in the radiation per DSA frame.

Purpose: To analyze the movement of the aorta in the craniocaudal direction (through-plane movement) during the cardiac cycle at several levels to determine any potential impact on endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: For this study, 30 patients (median age 73.0 years; 27 men) with an infrarenal AAA were randomly selected from a prospectively maintained EVAR database. All patients had undergone preoperative electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography consisting of 8 phases. After semiautomatic segmentation, a 3-dimensional location probe was placed in the center of the aorta (center point) on the orthogonal slices at 12 different levels along the aorta and iliac arteries for all 8 phases. Movement of the center point during the cardiac cycle was analyzed for each level. Values are given as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Results: The median through-plane movement of all levels was 3.0 mm (IQR 2.8–3.2) and appeared to be lower in the region of the celiac and renal arteries: 2.6 mm (IQR 1.7–3.1) at 3 cm proximal to the most distal renal artery and 2.4 mm (IQR 1.9–2.9) at 1 cm distal to the most distal renal artery, respectively. The thoracic part of the aorta showed the largest through-plane motion: 4.1 mm (IQR 2.7–4.6). Conclusion: This study quantifies aortic through-plane motion in the craniocaudal direction. Since through-plane movement appears to be limited, findings of previous studies investigating pulsatile in-plane distension seem to be representative for aortic distension.

Purpose: To examine the long-term outcomes of bare metal stent placement for exclusion of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. Methods: From 2006 to 2011, 7 consecutive symptomatic patients (4 men; mean age 52 years) with surgically inaccessible extracranial ICA aneurysms were treated with a bare stent at a single center. Patients received clopidogrel for 3 months after the procedure and aspirin for life. Clinical follow-up with duplex ultrasound and/or computed tomographic angiography was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Results: All procedures were technically successful; no neurological complications occurred. After 6 months, there was complete thrombosis of the aneurysm in all except one case. In this asymptomatic patient, the residual active flow was successfully obliterated by additional coil embolization. Over a mean follow-up of 57±22 months, all patients were alive and free of local or central neurological symptoms. All stents were patent, and thrombosis of the aneurysms was complete. Conclusion: In this small series, treatment of extracranial ICA aneurysms with a bare stent seems technically feasible and safe. All treated extracranial ICA aneurysms were excluded by primary intervention or secondary coil embolization.

Purpose: To identify in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortobronchial fistula (ABF) and aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). Methods: The authors reviewed all published cases of ABF and AEF undergoing TEVAR indexed in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases. After removal of duplicates, 850 articles were scrutinized for relevance and validity. Exclusion criteria included: (1) no clear description of the organs involved with the fistula, (2) no description of outcomes after TEVAR for ABF or AEF, or (3) no original data presented in the article. In this manner, 66 relevant articles were identified that included original data on 114 patients (76 men; mean age 63 +/- 1.5 years) with ABF (n=71) or AEF (n=43). Meta-analyses were performed to investigate outcomes of TEVAR for ABF and AEF. Results: Patients with AEF presented more frequently with hypovolemic shock (33% versus 13%, p=0.012) and systemic infection (36% versus 9%, p

Purpose: To describe the short-term consequences of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) on renal function after infrarenal (IR) versus transrenal (TR) stent-graft fixation. Methods: Between December 1996 and January 2006, 369 consecutive patients were treated with EVAR. All patients had an AneuRx or a Talent stent-graft implanted using IR (AneuRx) or transrenal (Talent) fixation. Post-EVAR, a standardized follow-up scheme included computed tomography (CT) scanning and serum creatinine measurements at 2 days, 3 months, and 12 months. Postoperative renal dysfunction was defined as a >20% decrease in serum creatinine clearance compared to baseline, the presence of new-onset dialysis, or both. Of the 369 patients, 309 (291 men; mean age 71±7 years, range 63–82) had complete 1-year follow-up and were included in this study. An IR stent-graft was placed in 190 patients, and a TR stent-graft was placed in the remaining 119 patients. Results: At discharge, renal dysfunction occurred in 3.7% of the patients in the IR group versus 5.9% in the TR group (p=NS) and rose significantly to 13.7% in the IR group (p=0.001) and 15.1% in the TR group (p=0.02) at the 1-year follow-up. However, no significant difference was noted between the IR and TR groups at either time point. At the 1-year follow-up, at least 50% of renal dysfunction was caused by obstructions of (accessory) renal arteries and renal infarctions. During the follow-up interval, 3 (0.97%) of 309 patients underwent new-onset dialysis. Conclusion: Both infrarenal and transrenal fixation techniques in EVAR will lead to a significant rise in renal dysfunction during the first year. A few patients with dysfunction will require dialysis.

To utilize dynamic magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to characterize aortic stiffness (beta) and elastic modulus (Ep) as indexes of wall compliance during the cardiac cycle and determine any influence of different endograft designs or the presence of endoleaks on these indexes.Eleven consecutive patients (11 men; median age 74 years, range 63-78) with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) selected for endovascular repair were scanned pre- and postoperatively. Aortic area and diameter changes during the cardiac cycle were determined using dynamic MRA at 4 levels: 3 cm above the renal arteries, between the renal arteries, 1 cm below the renal arteries, and at the level of maximum aneurysm sac diameter. Ep and beta were calculated. Data are presented as median (range); p0.05 was considered significant.Preoperatively, Ep and beta were significantly higher at the level of the aneurysm sac compared to all other levels (p0.05). Following EVAR, stiffness increased at this level (p0.05). After implantation, patients with an Excluder endograft demonstrated Ep and beta measurements at the aneurysm neck that were 94% and 60% higher, respectively, compared to those with a Talent (p0.05) endograft. The presence of an endoleak had no effect on Ep or beta.This study introduces the feasibility of dynamic MRA imaging-based calculations of aortic elastic modulus and stiffness. AAA patients demonstrate increased Ep and beta at the level of the aneurysm sac. EVAR results in increased aneurysm sac Ep and beta. Stent-graft design seems to alter Ep and beta within the aneurysm neck, which may have consequences for endograft durability. The presence of an endoleak does not seem to have an effect on Ep or beta.

Purpose: To utilize 40-slice electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated cine computed tomographic angiography (CTA) to characterize normal aortic motion during the cardiac cycle at relevant anatomical landmarks in preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients.Methods: In 10 consecutive preoperative AAA patients (10 men; mean age 78.8 years, range 69-86), an ECG-gated CTA dataset was acquired on a 40-slice CT scanner using a standard radiation dose. CTA quality was graded and scan time was measured. Pulsatility measurements at multiple relevant anatomical levels were performed in the axial plane. Changes in aortic circumference were determined for both the aortic wall and the luminal diameter.Results: All 10 CT scans were of good quality. All patients could be scanned in 14 to 33 seconds (mean 21). At each anatomical level measured, there was a 2.2- to 3.4-mm increase in the aortic wall circumference per cardiac cycle. A similar increase was observed in luminal circumference, with a 2.4- to 3.6-mm increase per cycle.Conclusion: This study introduces the concept of dynamic cine CTA imaging of aortic motion, providing insight into the pathophysiology of abdominal aortic and iliac pulsations. Patients with AAAs selected for EVAR demonstrate changes in aortic circumference with each cardiac cycle that may have consequences for endograft sizing and future design. The potential for graft migration, intermittent type I endoleak, and poor patient outcome following EVAR can be anticipated. Complex aortic dynamics deserve increased scrutiny in an effort to prevent potential complications.

Item does not contain fulltext