Search

Purpose: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of hybrid repair of the arch and proximal descending aorta in a single tertiary center for aortic disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 55 patients (median age 67 years; 36 men) who underwent hybrid repair of thoracic aortic pathology with involvement of the arch between January 2005 and May 2015 at a single tertiary center. The pathologies included 40 (73%) with aneurysmal disease, 10 (18%) acute type B aortic dissections, 2 with acute aortic syndrome, an acute type A dissection, and left and aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysms. Seven (13%) procedures were performed as an emergency. Demographics and procedure characteristics were collected for analysis of survival and reinterventions. Results: Complete aortic debranching was performed in 14 (25%) to facilitate endograft placement in zone 0; debranching was partial in 20 (36%) patients for zone 1 deployments and 21 (38%) for zone 2. Primary technical success was achieved in 51 (93%) cases. One patient died in-hospital from aneurysm rupture following aortic debranching prior to stent-graft repair. In another, the stent-graft procedure proved infeasible and was abandoned. The other 2 technical failures were due to type Ia endoleaks. Five (9%) patients died in-hospital (4 of 48 elective and 1 of 7 emergency cases); 2 of these patients died within 30 days (4%). Eight (14%) patients had a stroke, 6 of 48 elective and 2 of the 7 emergency patients. Spinal cord ischemia was reported in 3 (6%) patients. Mean follow-up was 74.6 months. Overall cumulative survival was 70% at 1 year, 68% at 2 years, and 57% at 5 years. Reintervention to the proximal landing zone for type Ia endoleak was required in 6% of cases. The overall rate of aortic reintervention was 18% at 1 year, 21% at 2 years, and 36% at 5 years. Overall extra-anatomic graft patency was 99%. Conclusion: Hybrid repair of the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta is technically feasible, with acceptable short-term mortality. There is a low rate of proximal landing zone reintervention when hybrid techniques are used to create an adequate proximal landing zone. Extra-anatomic bypass grafts have good long-term patency. Ongoing disease progression means that further distal aortic interventions are often necessary in patients with extensive disease.

To investigate the quality of stent-graft fenestrations created in vitro using different needle puncture and balloon dilation angles in different commercial endografts.Fenestrations were made in a standardized fashion in 3 different endograft types: Talent monofilament twill woven polyester, Zenith multifilament tubular woven polyester, and Endofit thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Punctures were made at 30°, 60°, and 90° angles using a 20-G needle and dilated using 6-mm standard and 7-mm cutting balloons; at least 6 fenestrations were made at each angle with standard balloons and at least 6 with cutting balloons. The 137 fenestrations were examined under light microscopy; quantitative and qualitative digital image analysis was performed to determine size, shape, and fenestration quality.PTFE grafts were easier to puncture/dilate, resulting in larger, elliptical fenestrations with overall better quality than the Dacron grafts; however, the puncture/dilation angle made an impact on the shape and quality of fenestrations. A significant number of fabric tears were observed in PTFE fabric at90° puncture/dilation angles compared to Dacron grafts. In Dacron grafts, fenestration quality was significantly higher with 90° puncture/dilation angles (higher in Talent grafts). Cutting balloon use resulted in significantly more fabric tears and poor quality fenestrations in all graft types.Different endografts behave significantly differently when fenestrations are fashioned. Optimum puncture/dilation is important when considering in vivo fenestration techniques. Improvements in instrumentation, materials, and techniques are required to make this a reliable and reproducible endovascular option.

To report the initial clinical use of a robotically steerable catheter during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in order to assess this novel and innovative approach in a clinical setting.Following a series of in-vitro studies and procedure rehearsals using a pulsatile silicon aneurysm model, a 78-year-old man underwent robot-assisted EVAR of a 5.9-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. During the standard procedure, a 14-F remotely steerable robotic catheter was used to successfully navigate through the aneurysm sac, cannulate the contralateral limb of a bifurcated stent-graft under fluoroscopic guidance, and place stiff wires using fine and controlled movements. The procedure was completed successfully. There were no postoperative complications, and computed tomographic angiography prior to discharge and at 3 months confirmed that the stent-graft remained in good position, with no evidence of an endoleak.EVAR using robotically-steerable catheters is feasible. This technology may simplify more complex procedures by increasing the accuracy of vessel cannulation and perhaps reduce procedure times and radiation exposure to the patient and operator.

PURPOSE To present a technique that addresses the problem of passing guiding catheters through a stent-graft fenestration and into the target orifice over the wire within the visceral vessel when the fenestration is remote from the top cap. TECHNIQUE A compliant molding balloon is introduced into the main body of the stent-graft and inflated above the fenestration to fill the redundant space in the proximal stent-graft to prevent upward angulation and subsequent displacement of the wire from the target vessel when a less flexible catheter is passed. CONCLUSION This technique is useful in cases with tortuous and complex anatomy and may reduce overall procedure times.