Search

The landscape in southwestern Ghana faces rampant modification due to socio-economic activities, posing threats to ecosystem service provision and environmental sustainability. Addressing these threats involves empowering land-use actors to design landscapes that offer multiple benefits concurrently. This study employs a geodesign framework, integrating participatory ecosystem service assessment and spatial simulations. This geodesign framework aims to design the landscape in a collaborative manner in a way that supports multiple benefits concurrently, mitigating the threats posed by landscape modification. Reflecting on local land-use perceptions during a workshop, we developed land-use options and land management strategies based on selected land-cover types. We identified urban greens, open space restoration, rubber mixed-stands, mangrove restoration, selective-cutting land preparation, soil conservation, and relay cropping as land-use options to target selected land-cover types of shrubland, cropland, smallholder rubber, smallholder palm, wetland, and settlement. The land management strategies translated into landscape scenarios based on local need conditions. We generated the local need conditions which translated into the landscape scenarios by reflecting on the location of land-cover types, 'change-effect' conditions within rubber, settlement, and cropland, and 'no-change'conditions within cropland. Results indicate synergies between the created landscape scenarios and ecosystem service provisioning, with 'no-change' within cropland providing the highest synergy and 'change-effect' within rubber providing the least synergy. Spatial modeling of local perceptions forms the novelty of this study, as the fusion of participatory assessments and spatial modeling allows for a more holistic understanding of the landscape, its services, and the potential implications of different management strategies. The geodesign framework facilitated the design of the complex heterogeneous landscape to visualize possibilities of maximizing multiple benefits and can be used for future planning on the landscape. • Geodesign framework is used to develop and evaluate land-use options on ecosystem service. • Ecosystem service assessments focused on perceptions and spatially explicit simulations. • Results show land-use options increased ecosystem service provisioning • Result indicates respect for local values to design landscapes for a sustainable outcome. • Geodesign framework promotes more informed and inclusive decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased agriculture and aquaculture production in the Mekong Delta during the last two decades has improved farmers' income, national export earnings and reduced poverty, but has also impacted on the environment and ecosystem services (ES) of importance to peoples' livelihoods and well-being. Through group discussions, interviews and questionnaires, this study assesses stakeholders' perceptions of the status and trends of ES in the Mekong Delta and how these have been influenced by agriculture development. 15 of 24 ES were assessed to be impacted negatively by agriculture intensification, and especially supporting and regulating ES (SRES). Only a few provisioning ES (PrES), related to farming, were assessed to be in a good and stable supply, because of human interventions to create favorable conditions for these ES. Among the ten highest ranked ES, eight belonged to PrES and two belonged to SRES. There was a positive correlation between rank and awareness of ES. The supply of most SRES was perceived to be in a low and declining status and assessed to be in a high need for improved management. Some ES, such as pest-control had been complemented with human-made substitutes, such as pesticides, which however sometimes weakened rather than strengthened the ES. Cultural ES (CES) were often ranked lower and of less management concern than the other groups of ES. It is concluded that future agriculture strategies need a more balanced management of ES for a long-term production of healthy food and increased resilience of the Mekong Delta to cope with future challenges, such as climate change and upstream dams. [Display omitted] • 15 of 24 ecosystem services (ES) were impacted by agriculture intensification. • Only a few provisioning ES, related to farming, were in a good supply. • Stakeholders ranked provisioning ES higher than regulating and cultural ES. • A balanced management of ES is needed to increase the resilience of the Mekong Delta. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In agroecological mosaic landscapes, the potential of the landscape to provide a broad range of ecosystem services (ES) is vital to human well-being. Landscape structure and composition plays an important role in ecosystem functioning and the production of ES. In this study, we aim to evaluate the potential of natural land use types within an agroecological mosaic landscape to provide biodiversity and ES, and evaluate landscape scales more suitable to identify ES production. We conducted our study in the Credit River Watershed, in southern Ontario (Canada). We assessed the proportion of land use types in the surrounding land cover for each site and, using field-based measurements, analyzed its association with the following parameters: plant species richness (biodiversity), aboveground carbon stock (global climate regulation), atmospheric temperature (local climate regulation), and several parameters for water quality regulation. Our results show that a higher percentage of natural areas within an agroecological mosaic landscape was associated with increased provision of many of the studied parameters. For three of them, the smallest spatial scales of assessment (site and local) had the highest proportion of the variance explained. Atmospheric temperature was the variable that could be assessed in all spatial scales, indicating that natural habitats, especially forests, can regulate temperature in both site, local and regional scales. Our findings highlight the importance of conserving natural ecosystems within the landscape mosaic, enabling the provision of biodiversity and ES. These results have implications for landscape management, as actions conducted at specific landscape scales, such as conservation/restoration efforts or urban expansion, can potentially impact biodiversity and the provision of ES that benefit human well-being. • Natural areas within mosaic landscapes can improve values of several ES. • Natural areas are associated with ES production, especially at smaller scales. • Local climate regulation can be assessed at site, local and regional scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Across Pacific Island Countries, projects and policies are incorporating objectives related to managing landscape multifunctionality to sustain flows of multiple, valued ecosystem services. Strategies to manage natural resources are often not effective, or do not have intended outcomes, if they do not account for local contexts and the varied needs and constraints of stakeholders who rely upon natural resources for their livelihoods. Through fieldwork in Ba, Fiji, local insights were generated concerning the institutional, geographic, and socio-economic factors which determine and challenge i) different stakeholders' ability to access landscape resources, and ii) stakeholders' capacities to benefit from ecosystem services. The following insights were generated from this research which are important for guiding management of landscape multifunctionality. In Ba, hierarchical governance systems present barriers to effective management of landscape multifunctionality, and projects or policies with aims to manage landscapes should establish context appropriate multi-scale governance. Such governance systems should facilitate communication and interaction between different stakeholders, build upon community knowledge, and support communities as key actors in landscape management. Consideration of the spatial footprint of landscape resources, stakeholders' different physical and financial capacities, and the institutional structures that mediate access to resources should be central to landscape management and planning. Various climatic stressors affect flows of ecosystem services from the Ba landscape and people's capacity to access landscape resources; therefore, it is important that management of landscapes also builds resilience to climate stressors. • Participatory fieldwork in three Fijian communities. • A range of institutional, geographic, climatic, and socio-economic factors interact to affect ecosystem service flows which support livelihoods. • Local-level challenges to accessing and utilising landscape resources identified. • Community-level insights generated to guide management of Pacific Island landscape multifunctionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]