Search

Background and Aim: Adequate mucosal elevation by submucosal injection is important for definitive en bloc resection and prevention of perforation during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of 0.13% hyaluronic acid (HA) solution for high and sustained mucosal elevation during colorectal EMR. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial; a total of 196 patients with colon polyps of < 20 mm diameter were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo EMR using either 0.13% HA or normal saline (NS). The primary outcome of the study was histopathologically confirmed complete resection. The secondary outcomes such as maintenance of high mucosal elevation and development of complications were also evaluated. Moreover, the relationship between complete resection and the experience of the endoscopist (veteran vs less experienced) was analyzed. Results: Compete resection was achieved in 74 of 93 polyps (79.5%) in the 0.13% HA group and 63 of 96 polyps (65.6%) in the NS group ( P < 0.05). High mucosal elevation was maintained in 83.9% of procedures in the 0.13% HA group and 54.1% in the NS group ( P < 0.01). The frequency of complete resection achieved by less-experienced endoscopists was higher in the 0.13% HA group (79.3%) than in the NS group (62.1%; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoscopic mucosal resection using 0.13% HA to colon polyps of less than 20 mm diameter is more effective than NS for complete resection and maintenance of mucosal elevation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an alternative to transanal resection (TAR) in treating rectal adenomas, intramucosal cancers, and superficial submucosal cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy between ESD and TAR for non-invasive rectal tumors. Between January 1998 and December 2006, 85 patients with preoperative diagnosis of non-invasive rectal tumors were treated by ESD or TAR. En-bloc resection, local recurrence, complication, procedure time, and hospital stay were evaluated retrospectively using a prospectively-completed database. Mean resection sizes were 40 mm and 39 mm in diameter for the ESD and TAR groups, respectively. En-bloc resections with a negative resection margin were achieved in 67% (35/52) of the ESD group, which was significantly higher than the 42% (14/33) in the TAR group. Sixty-three lesions were diagnosed as curative resection, histopathologically. There was no local recurrence in the ESD group, but five local recurrences developed in the TAR group. Two rectal perforations, one minor delayed bleeding, and one subcutaneous emphysema in the ESD group were successfully managed conservatively. There were one minor delayed bleeding and two anesthesia-related complications in the TAR group. The ESD group had a shorter hospital stay than the TAR group (4.9 days vs 7 days), but a longer procedure time (131 min vs 63 min). ESD was more effective than TAR in treating non-invasive rectal tumors, with a lower recurrence rate and shorter hospital stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]