Search

Background and Aim: Patients indicated to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement may have splenectomy history due to thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prior splenectomy on TIPS procedure and post‐TIPS outcomes. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis based on a cohort of 284 patients with cirrhosis submitted to TIPS; 74 patients had splenectomy history (splenectomy group) and 210 did not (non‐splenectomy group). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between splenectomy and outcomes after TIPS. The primary outcome was shunt dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause mortality, clinical recurrence of bleeding or ascites, and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). Results: During a median follow‐up of 16.2 months, the splenectomy group had significantly lower rates of postoperative shunt patency (85.5% vs 95.6% at 1 year and 75.2% vs 86.5% at 2 years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.12; P = 0.01) and higher risk of OHE (adjusted HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.03–3.54; P = 0.04). But the risk of mortality (adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.41–1.87; P = 0.73) and recurrent bleeding or ascites (adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.53–2.35; P = 0.77) showed no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis confirmed splenectomy history and endoscopic therapy as independent predictors of shunt dysfunction. Besides, pre‐TIPS splenectomy increased the difficulty of TIPS procedure by complicating portal vein puncture. Conclusions: For patients with cirrhosis submitted to TIPS, prior splenectomy complicated TIPS procedure and increased the risk of shunt dysfunction and OHE after TIPS, but was not significantly associated with the occurrence of mortality and recurrent bleeding or ascites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the survival and other portal hypertension‐related complications of patients with portal pressure gradient (PPG) ≥ 25 mmHg using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as the first‐line and second‐line therapies in secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage. Methods: Fifty patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis were enrolled in this retrospective study, with 35 of whom received TIPS as the first‐line therapy in secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage and 15 of whom as second‐line treatment. We observed and analyzed the survival, occurrence of variceal rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) of patients in the two groups during the follow up. Results: The technical success rate was 100%. In a median follow‐up time of 12 (1–37) and 15 (2–27) months, respectively, significant statistical difference was observed between the first‐line group and the second‐line group concerning cumulative survival rate (94.3% vs 66.7%, log–rank P = 0.01). But that was not the case when it comes to the cumulative rate of variceal rebleeding (8.6% vs 26.7%, log–rank P = 0.164) and HE (22.9% vs 20.0%, log–rank P = 0.793). And multivariate analysis indicated that group assignment (hazard ratio = 8.250, 95% confidence interval = 1.383–49.213, P = 0.021) was the only predictor of survival. Interestingly, we found that spleen diameter (hazard ratio = 0.578, 95% confidence interval = 0.393–0.849, P = 0.005) could be regarded as independent predictor of the occurrence of HE. Conclusions: For patients with PPG ≥ 25 mmHg who have recovered from an episode of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage, utilizing TIPS as the first‐line therapy to prevent rebleeding is demonstrated effective in improving the survival and therefore should be recommended to a wider range of clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]