Search

Your search keyword '"Chen, Wei-Feng"' showing total 8 results
Start Over Author "Chen, Wei-Feng" Journal journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
8 results on '"Chen, Wei-Feng"'

2. Management of delayed bleeding of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal tunneling procedures: a retrospective single‐center analysis and brief meta‐analysis

Author

Wang, Li, primary, Liu, Zu‐Qiang, additional, Zhang, Ji‐Yuan, additional, Chen, Shi‐Yao, additional, Zhong, Yun‐Shi, additional, Zhang, Yi‐Qun, additional, Chen, Wei‐Feng, additional, Ma, Li‐Li, additional, Qin, Wen‐Zheng, additional, Hu, Jian‐Wei, additional, Cai, Ming‐Yan, additional, Yao, Li‐Qing, additional, Li, Quan‐Lin, additional, and Zhou, Ping‐Hong, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. A cross‐sectional study reveals a chronic low‐grade inflammation in achalasia

Author

Ma, Li‐Yun, primary, Liu, Zu‐Qiang, additional, Chen, Wei‐Feng, additional, Yao, Lu, additional, Zhong, Yun‐Shi, additional, Zhang, Yi‐Qun, additional, Ma, Li‐Li, additional, Qin, Wen‐Zhen, additional, Hu, Jian‐Wei, additional, Cai, Ming‐Yan, additional, Zhang, Zhen, additional, Lin, Sheng‐Li, additional, Hu, Hao, additional, Zhou, Ping‐Hong, additional, and Li, Quan‐Lin, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Endoscopic radial incision versus endoscopic balloon dilation as initial treatments of benign esophageal anastomotic stricture

Author

Zhang, Zhao‐Chao, primary, Xu, Jia‐Qi, additional, Xu, Jia‐Xin, additional, Xu, Mei‐Dong, additional, Chen, Shi‐Yao, additional, Zhong, Yun‐Shi, additional, Zhang, Yi‐Qun, additional, Chen, Wei‐Feng, additional, Ma, Li‐Li, additional, Qin, Wen‐Zheng, additional, Hu, Jian‐Wei, additional, Cai, Ming‐Yan, additional, Yao, Li‐Qing, additional, Li, Quan‐Lin, additional, and Zhou, Ping‐Hong, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Comparison of safety and short‐term outcomes between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a diameter of 2–5 cm

Author

Liu, Yan‐Bo, primary, Liu, Xin‐Yang, additional, Fang, Yong, additional, Chen, Tian‐Yin, additional, Hu, Jian‐Wei, additional, Chen, Wei‐Feng, additional, Li, Quan‐Lin, additional, Cai, Ming‐Yan, additional, Qin, Wen‐Zheng, additional, Xu, Xiao‐Yue, additional, Wu, Linfeng, additional, Zhang, Yi‐Qun, additional, and Zhou, Ping‐Hong, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for the jejunoileal lesions.

Author

Wang L, Liu ZQ, Zhang JY, Li QL, Chen SY, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, Yao LQ, Ma LL, and Zhou PH

Subjects
Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Feasibility Studies, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Treatment Outcome, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Intestinal Mucosa pathology, Colonoscopy adverse effects, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection adverse effects, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection methods
Abstract

Background: Endoscopic resection (ER) for jejunoileal lesions (JILs) has been technically challenging. We aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, feasibility, and safety of ER for JILs., Method: We retrospectively investigated 52 patients with JILs who underwent ER from January 2012 to February 2022. We collected and analyzed clinicopathological characteristics, procedure-related parameters, outcomes, and follow-up data., Results: The mean age was 49.4 years. Of the 52 JILs, 33 ileal tumors within 20 cm from the ileocecal valve were resected with colonoscopy, while 19 tumors in the jejunum or the ileum over 20 cm from the ileocecal valve received enteroscopy resection. The mean procedure duration was 49.0 min. The en bloc resection and en bloc with R0 resection rates were 86.5% and 84.6%, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) included one (1.9%) major AE (delayed bleeding) and five (9.6%) minor AEs. During a median follow-up of 36.5 months, two patients had local recurrence (3.8%), while none had metastases. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 92.9% and 94.1%, respectively. Compared with the enteroscopy group, overall AEs were significantly lower in the colonoscopy group (P < 0.05), but no statistical differences were observed in RFS (P = 0.412) and DSS (P = 0.579). There were no significant differences in AEs, RFS, and DSS between the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) group., Conclusions: ER of JILs has favorable short-term and long-term outcomes. Both ESD and EMR can safely and effectively resect JILs in appropriately selected cases., (© 2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results