1. Criteria for Hyponatremic Overcorrection: Systematic Review and Cohort Study of Emergently Ill Patients
- Author
-
Carl van Walraven and Jason D. Woodfine
- Subjects
Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Hospitalized patients ,010102 general mathematics ,English language ,Emergency department ,Electrolyte disturbance ,medicine.disease ,01 natural sciences ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cohort ,Internal Medicine ,Medicine ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,business ,Hyponatremia ,Cohort study - Abstract
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance amongst hospitalized patients. An overly rapid rate of correction of chronic hyponatremia is believed to increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes including osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). There is disagreement in the literature regarding the definition of hyponatremic overcorrection. We performed a systematic review of all English language studies to identify those that calculated sodium correction rate and classified patients’ overcorrection status. We then identified all patients who presented to our hospital’s emergency department between 2003 and 2015 with a corrected serum sodium ≤ 116 mmol/L. All methods from the systematic review for sodium correction rate calculation and overcorrection status were applied to this cohort. We identified 24 studies citing 9 distinct sodium correction rate methods and 14 criteria for overcorrection. Six hundred twenty-four patients presenting with severe hyponatremia (median initial value 113 mMol) were identified. Depending on the method used, the median sodium correction rates in our cohort ranged from 0.271 to 1.13 mmol/L per hour. The proportion of patients classified with overcorrection with the different criteria varied almost 11-fold, ranging from 8.5 to 89.9%. Published methods disagree regarding the calculation of sodium correction rates and the definition of hyponatremic overcorrection. This leads to wide variations in sodium correction rates and the prevalence of overcorrection in patient cohorts. Definitions based on ODS risk are needed.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF