Search

The regional gravimetric geoid solved using boundary-value problems of the potential theory is usually determined in two computational steps: (1) downward continuing ground gravity data onto the geoid using inverse Poisson's integral equation in a mass-free space and (2) evaluating geoidal heights by applying Stokes integral to downward continued gravity. In this contribution, the two integration steps are combined in one step and the so-called one-step integration method in spherical approximation is implemented to compute the regional gravimetric geoid model. Advantages of using the one-step integration method instead of the two integration steps include less computational cost, more stable numerical computation and better utilization of input ground gravity data (reduced in each integration step to avoid edge effects). A discrete form of the one-step integral equation is used to convert mean values of ground gravity anomalies into mean values of geoidal heights. To evaluate mean values of the integral kernel in the vicinity of the computation point, a fast and numerically accurate analytical formula is proposed using planar approximation. The proposed formula is tested to determine the regional gravimetric geoid of the Auvergne test area, France. Results show a good agreement of the estimated geoid with geoidal heights estimated at GNSS-levelling reference points, with the standard deviation for the difference of 3.3 cm. Considering the uncertainty of geoidal heights derived at the GNSS/levelling reference points, one can conclude the geoid models computed by the one-step and two-step integration methods have negligible differences. Thus, the one-step method can be recommended for regional geoid modelling with its methodological and numerical advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper represents a milestone in the UNB effort to formulate an accurate and self-consistent theory for regional geoid determination. To get the geoid to a sub-centimetre accuracy, we had to formulate the theory in a spherical rather than linear approximation, advance the modelling of the effect of topographic mass density, formulate the solid spherical Bouguer anomaly, develop the probabilistic downward continuation approach, incorporate improved satellite determined global gravitational models and introduce a whole host of smaller improvements. Having adopted Auvergne, an area in France as our testing ground, where the mean standard deviation of observed gravity values is 0.5 mGal, according to the Institute Geographique Nationale (Duquenne in Proceedings of the 1st international symposium of the international gravity field service "gravity field of the earth", International gravity field service meeting, Istanbul, Turkey, 2006), we obtained the standard deviation of the gravity anomalies continued downward to the geoid, as estimated by minimizing the L2 norm of their residuals, to be in average 3 times larger than those on the surface with large spikes underneath the highest topographic points. The standard deviations of resulting geoidal heights range from a few millimetres to just over 6 cm for the highest topographic points in the Alpine region (just short of 2000 m). The mean standard deviations of the geoidal heights for the whole region are only 0.6 cm, which should be considered quite reasonable even if one acknowledges that the area of Auvergne is mostly flat. As one should expect, the main contributing factors to these uncertainties are the Poisson probabilistic downward continuation process, with the maximum standard deviation just short of 6 cm (the average value of 2.5 mm) and the topographic density uncertainties, with the maximum value of 5.6 cm (the average value of 3.0 mm). The comparison of our geoidal heights with the testing geoidal heights, obtained for a set of 75 control points (regularly spaced throughout the region), shows the mean shift of 13 cm which is believed to reflect the displacement of the French vertical datum from the geoid due to sea surface topography. The mean root square error of the misfit is 3.3 cm. This misfit, when we consider the estimated accuracy of our geoid, indicates that the mean standard deviation of the "test geoid" is about 3 cm, which makes it about 5 times less accurate than the Stokes–Helmert computed geoid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new mathematical model for evaluation of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor is formulated in this article. Firstly, we construct corresponding differential operators for the components of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor in a spherical local north-oriented frame. We show that the differential operators may efficiently be decomposed into an azimuthal and an isotropic part. The differential operators are even more simplified for a certain class of isotropic kernels. Secondly, the differential operators are applied to the well-known integrals of Newton, Abel-Poisson, Pizzetti and Hotine. In this way, 40 new integral formulas are derived. The new integral formulas allow for evaluation of the components of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor from density distribution, disturbing gravitational potential, gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances. Thirdly, we investigate the behaviour of the corresponding integral kernels in the spatial domain. The new mathematical formulas extend the theoretical apparatus of geodesy, i.e. the well-known Meissl scheme, and reveal important properties of the third-order gravitational tensor. They may be exploited in geophysical studies, continuation of gravitational field quantities and analysing the gradiometric-geodynamic boundary value problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]