Search

The identification of the Grenvillian‐age ophiolite suites in the Yangtze block in recent years suggested that the northern Yangtze subblock (NYB) and the southern Yangtze subblock (SYB) were once separated by an ocean in late Mesoproterozoic. Although some paleogeographic models advocated the Pre‐Grenvillian connections between the south China blocks and Laurentia, none of them has been paleomagnetically tested. Here we report the new paleomagnetic results obtained from the ∼1,270 Ma purplish‐red muddy dolomite beds of the Luanshigou Formation, Shennongjia Group, NYB, providing new constraints for reconstructing the paleogeographic positions of the south China blocks in late Mesoproterozoic. A total of 447 samples underwent stepwise thermal demagnetization. Two components were identified. The low‐temperature component is interpreted as the recent viscous remnant magnetization. The high‐temperature component was obtained from 64 samples below 580°C and from 177 samples below 690°C, directed northeast‐up or southwest‐down, antipodally, positioning the paleomagnetic pole at 18.5°S, 74.4°E (dm/dp = 2.5/1.6°). Rock magnetic results demonstrate that the magnetic carriers in purplish‐red dolomite and pale‐pink dolomite are predominated by hematite and magnetite, respectively. The data quality is supported by an inverse baked contact test, a B‐class reversal test, and the paleomagnetic pole is distinct from any younger poles of the region. Based on the paleomagnetic results, aided by geological evidence, we propose a reconstruction in which the NYB was juxtaposed to southwestern Laurentia in the late Mesoproterozoic and suggest that the late Mesoproterozoic Miaowan‐Shimian ophiolite zone in the Yangtze block was likely an extension of the Grenville belt of Laurentia. Plain Language Summary: The south China block was traditionally subdivided into the Yangtze block to the northwest and the Cathaysia block to the southeast, which were separated by an early Neoproterozoic ocean. Recently published geological data further suggest that the Yangtze block contains two subblocks, the NYB and the SYB, which were separated by a late Mesoproterozoic ocean. Several paleogeographic models proposed the Mesoproterozoic relationships between the south China blocks and Laurentia, but none has been paleomagnetically tested. Here we report a new paleomagnetic pole obtained from the ∼1,270 Ma purplish‐red dolomite beds of the Luanshigou Formation, Shennongjia Group in the NYB. The data quality is assured by the positive paleomagnetic field tests. Our results combing with the geological evidence suggest that the NYB was located in a low‐latitudinal position and connected to southwestern Laurentia in the late Mesoproterozoic. The late Mesoproterozoic ophiolite zone in the southern margin of the NYB was likely an extension of the Grenville belt. Key Points: A new paleomagnetic pole (18.5°S, 74.4°E, dm/dp = 2.5/1.6°) was obtained from the late Mesoproterozoic Luanshigou Formation of the Shennongjia Group in south ChinaThe northern Yangtze subblock (NYB) was connected to southwestern Laurentia at the late MesoproterozoicThe late Mesoproterozoic Miaowan‐Shimian suture zone in the southern margin of the NYB was likely an extension of the Grenvillian orogenic belt [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paleogeography of the Tethyan Himalaya (TH) during the Mesozoic is vital to constrain the evolutionary history of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean, but reliable paleomagnetic data from Jurassic rocks in this area are scarce. Here, we report the first high‐quality paleomagnetic results from the Middle Jurassic (∼175–173 Ma) Lanongla Formation limestones in the Nyalam area of the TH. For most specimens, stepwise thermal or hybrid demagnetization reveals two well‐defined magnetization components. A low‐temperature component, which is isolated between natural remanent magnetization and 200–300°C, is consistent with the present geomagnetic field direction. A high‐temperature component, which is isolated between 300–350°C/10–25 mT and 500–580°C/60–120 mT, passes fold tests at the 95% and 99% confidence level, indicating a prefolding primary magnetization. The tilt‐corrected site‐mean direction for 28 paleomagnetic sites is Ds = 331.0° and Is = −49.9° with α95 = 2.7°, which provides a Fisherian site‐mean paleopole at 23.7°N, 292.9°E with A95 = 2.8° and a paleolatitude of 31.7 ± 2.8°S for the Nyalam study area (28.6°N, 86.1°E). A comparison between the reliable Middle Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous poles obtained from the TH and those observed from the Lhasa terrane reveals that the Neo‐Tethys Ocean for the reference point (29.1°N, 86.1°E) had a latitudinal width of 3,500 ± 1,000 km at ∼174 Ma, reached its greatest width of 7,000 ± 1,000 km at ∼137 Ma, and had an average latitudinal spreading rate of ∼10.4 cm/year during ∼174–137 Ma. Plain Language Summary: The Neo‐Tethys Ocean here refers to the prehistoric ocean that existed between the Lhasa terrane to the north and the Indian plate to the south during the much of the Mesozoic and early Cenozoic. Knowledge of the development of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean is crucial to understanding the evolution of the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau. However, the opening of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean remains controversial. In this work, we report what we consider is the first high‐quality Middle Jurassic age paleopole from the Tethyan Himalaya, which shows that the Nyalam area was located at 31.7 ± 2.8°S at ∼174 Ma and that the Neo‐Tethys Ocean was at least ∼3,500 km wide in a N–S direction at that time. Key Points: The Nyalam area of the Tethyan Himalaya (TH) was located at 31.7 ± 2.8°S at ∼174 MaThe Neo‐Tethys Ocean opened a latitudinal width of ∼3,500 km at ∼174 Ma and reached its greatest width of ∼7,000 km at ∼137 MaThe Neo‐Tethys Ocean had an average latitudinal spreading rate of ∼10.4 cm/year during ∼174–137 Ma [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies highlight the debates about the role of the northwestern China blocks, for example, north Tarim block, south Tarim block (STB), Altyn Tagh block (ATB) and Qaidam‐Qilian block (QQB) during the assembly of Rodinia. We herein present a combined paleomagnetic, geochronological, and geochemical study on 16 mafic dikes in the northern ATB. After removing a recent viscous remanent magnetization, three characteristic remanent magnetization components (CHs) were isolated. CH1 was identified in eight NW‐trending diabase dikes, one of which was newly dated at 895.3 ± 7.7 Ma through use of SHRIMP baddeleyite U‐Pb methodology. It yields a mean direction (D/I) of 123.3°/−42.2° (α95 = 12.1°). The paleopole (40.9°S/184.6°E, A95 = 11.7°) was calculated by averaging eight virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) from each dike. A partial baked‐contact test supports the primary origin of CH1. CH2 was isolated from three E‐W trending diabase dikes, pointing northwest with considerably shallower downward inclinations. CH3 was obtained from five lamprophyre dikes, directing southeast with moderate to shallow upward inclinations. However, the VGPs of either CH2 or CH3 are insufficient to average a precise mean pole. Geochemical analyses also reveal petrogenetic discrepancy among the dikes with distinct CHs. Combining the new ∼895 Ma pole of CH1 with the global paleomagnetic database and being aided by geological evidence, we propose that the STB‐ATB‐QQB and the north China craton were located along the northwestern side of Laurentia in Rodinia at ∼895 Ma, and suggest the connection might have been intact until ∼780 Ma. Plain Language Summary: The paleogeographic positions of the northwestern China blocks, including the north Tarim block, the south Tarim block, the Altyn Tagh block (ATB) and the Qaidam‐Qilian block in the Rodinia supercontinent, remain enigmatic and highly controversial. Here we present new paleomagnetic geochronological and geochemical data from three groups of the mafic dikes in the northern ATB. Our new results, in combination with other coeval paleomagnetic poles and geological evidence, support a specific proximity among the south Tarim, Altyn Tagh, Qaidam‐Qilian blocks and the north China craton along the northwestern side of Laurentia between ∼895 and ∼780 Ma. Key Points: A new paleomagnetic pole was obtained from eight early Neoproterozoic mafic dikes in the northern Altyn Tagh blockThe pole was dated at 895.3 ± 7.7 Ma using baddeleyite U‐Pb SHRIMP methodologyThe adjacent south Tarim‐Altyn Tagh‐Qaidam‐Qilian block and north China craton were located at NW side of Laurentia on the periphery of Rodinia [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The timing and location India–Asia collision is crucial to understanding the evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and global climate change; however, estimates of the timing of the India–Asia collision and the size of Greater India remain highly controversial. We report here the first reliable early Eocene paleomagnetic results from the Zhepure Formation limestone in the Tethyan Himalaya (TH). Both positive fold and reversal tests indicate a primary origin. The tilt‐corrected site‐mean direction is Ds = 332.6°, Is = 20.1°, ks = 90.9, α95 = 2.8° (N = 30). The site‐mean inclination increased from 20.1° to 27.5° after inclination shallowing correction, yielding a paleopole at 61.2°N, 337.3°E, A95 = 2.6° and a corresponding paleolatitude of 15.2° ± 2.6°N for the reference point (29.5°N, 91.0°E). Our new paleomagnetic results, together with the reliable Cretaceous to Paleogene paleomagnetic results from the TH, Lhasa terrane and Indian craton, suggest that there was ∼900–1,140 km north‐south crustal shortening occurred between the TH and the Indian craton, and that India collided with Asia at no later than ∼51–49.5 Ma. Plain Language Summary: The India–Asia collision is among the most intriguing topics in earth sciences because of its influence on global climate and Cenozoic topography. However, several questions still remain unanswered, such as: how big was Greater India? When, where, and how did the India collide with Asia? We report the first reliable early Eocene paleopole from the TH and assess the timing of the India–Asia collision and the size of Greater India. Our results suggest a relatively small Greater India, and that India collided with Asia at no later than ∼51–49.5 Ma. The constraints on the India–Asia collision indicated by our data provide new boundary conditions for the history of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and global climate change. Key Points: The Tethyan Himalaya (TH) was located at 15.2° ± 2.6°N at ∼51–49.5 MaThere was ∼900–1,140 km north‐south crustal shortening occurred between the TH and the Indian cratonIndia collided with Asia at no later than ∼51–49.5 Ma [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A combined paleomagnetic and geochronological study was conducted on the red beds of the Zhesi Formation (ZSF) in the Xilinhot–Songliao Block (XSB) and the andesites and sandstones of the Qingfengshan Formation (QFF) in the North China Block (NCB). The ZSF tuffs and the QFF andesites were dated to 265.3 ± 1.8 Ma and 254.8–257.1 Ma, respectively, using the zircon U–Pb laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) method. A total of 246 paleomagnetic samples were subjected to stepwise thermal demagnetization. After removal of the low‐temperature viscous components acquired in the recent geomagnetic field, stable high‐temperature components (HTCs) were isolated from most samples. The HTC of the ZSF passed a fold test, and the HTC of the QFF passed both fold and reversal tests, indicating their primary origins. The corresponding paleomagnetic poles are 57.4°N/342.0°E (A95 = 4.3°) for the XSB at ~265 Ma and 54.3°N/20.2°E (A95 = 3.3°) for the NCB at ~255 Ma. Comparison of high‐quality Permian paleomagnetic poles of the XSB and NCB reveals a latitudinal convergence and relative rotation between them that led to a scissors‐like closure of the Solonker Ocean from west to east between ~265 and ~246 Ma, which controlled the mixing of the Cathaysian and Angara floras in space and time. The XSB and NCB moved rapidly northward between ~265 and ~255 Ma, which probably accelerated the end‐Guadalupian mass extinction in East Asia. Key Points: New Middle–Late Permian paleomagnetic data were obtained from Inner Mongolia on both sides of the Solonker Suture (SLS)The SLS is formed in a scissors‐like collision from west to east during 265–246 Ma, controlling the mixing of the Cathaysian and Angara florasThe East Asian blocks drifted rapidly northward during 265–255 Ma and probably accelerated the end‐Guadalupian mass extinction in East Asia [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The precollisional paleolatitude of the Tethyan Himalaya is essential to constrain the India‐Asia collision, the size of Greater India, and the Neotethyan paleogeography. However, reliable Late Cretaceous‐Paleocene paleomagnetic datasets are still scarce because of serious remagnetization. Here we report the first redbed‐based paleomagnetic results from the Paleocene (60‐58 Ma) redbeds in the Saga area of the northern Tethyan Himalaya. The tilt‐corrected site‐mean direction obtained from 36 paleomagnetic sites is D=178.7°, I=9.5° with ɑ95=5.4°, corresponding to a paleopole at 55.9°N, 267.6°E with dp/dm=2.8°/5.5° and a paleolatitude of 4.8°±2.8°S for the study area (29.3°N, 85.3°E). The site‐mean inclination increased from 9.5 to 14.9° after the anisotropy‐based inclination shallowing correction, leading to corresponding paleolatitudes increasing from 4.8 to 7.6°S. This reliable paleomagnetic dataset passes positive fold tests and supports that the northern Tethyan Himalaya was located at 6.3±4.3°S during 60‐58 Ma. Comparison with the coeval paleolatitudes expected from the Indian craton indicates that a north‐south crustal shortening of 3.1±5.5° (340±610 km) occurred between the Indian craton and the northern Tethyan Himalaya after 59 Ma, and no wide ocean extended between them after the Latest Jurassic. Our new Paleocene results together with reliable Cretaceous paleomagnetic results from the Lhasa terrane show that the India‐Asia collision occurred at 47.1±4.5 Ma. Key Points: The Saga area of the northern Tethyan Himalaya at ~59 Ma lay at 6.3°±4.3°SNeither wide Ocean extension nor >1,000 km crustal shortening occurred between Indian craton and Tethyan Himalaya after the latest JurassicThe India‐Asia collision occurred at 47.1±4.5 Ma [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The breakup of eastern Gondwana is among the hottest topics in the Earth sciences because of its effect on global climate during the Jurassic‐Cretaceous, its influence on the evolution of life, and its importance to paleogeographic reconstruction. To better constrain the Jurassic and Cretaceous paleogeographic position of the Tethyan Himalaya and the breakup of eastern Gondwana, a combined paleomagnetic and geochronological study was performed on the Zhela and Weimei Formations lava flows, dated at ~138–135 Ma, in the Luozha area of the eastern Tethyan Himalaya. Both positive fold and reversal tests together with a maximum grouping at 100% unfolding indicate that the characteristic remanent magnetization directions are primary magnetizations acquired before folding. The tilt‐corrected directions yielded a paleopole at 0.9°N, 293.4°E with A95 = 7.0° and a corresponding paleolatitude of 53.5°S ± 7.0°S for the Luozha sampling area (28.9°N, 91.3°E), validating that the original erupted position of the Zhela and Weimei Formations lava flows was located in the center of the Kerguelen mantle plume. Our new results, together with the published paleomagnetic, geochronological, and geochemical results, demonstrate that the Comei‐Bunbury large igneous province originated from the Kerguelen mantle plume. The temporal and spatial relationships between the Comei‐Bunbury large igneous province and the Kerguelen mantle plume indicate that eastern Gondwana initially rifted at ~147 Ma and that the Indian Plate fully separated from the Australian‐Antarctic Plate before ~124 Ma. Key Points: The Luozha sampling area was located at ~53.5 degrees south plus‐minus 7.0 degrees south at ~138‐135 MaThe Comei‐Bunbury large igneous province (LIP) originated from the Kerguelen mantle plumeEastern Gondwana initially rifted at ~147 Ma, and the Indian Plate fully separated from the Australian‐Antarctic Plate before ~124 Ma [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To position the Asian southern margin before the India-Asia collision, paleomagnetic and geochronologic studies were performed on the Dianzhong Formation lava flows from the Shiquanhe area of the westernmost Lhasa terrane (LT). Zircon U-Pb analyses dated the lava flows to ~69.5 ± 2.5 Ma. The characteristic remanent magnetization directions contain antipodal polarities and pass fold tests, implying that they are primary magnetizations; this interpretation is supported by rock-magnetic analyses and petrographic observations. Forty-four site-mean directions were divided into 17 statistically independent direction groups. The group-mean direction after tilt correction is Ds = 43.3°, Is = 30.3°, k = 28.0, α95 = 6.9°. The corresponding paleopole at 47.8°N, 181.4°E ( A95 = 6.4°) yields a paleolatitude of 16.6° ± 6.4°N for the Shiquanhe area of westernmost Tibet (32.34°N, 80.12°E). Consistent paleolatitudes for the southern margin of the LT calculated from the western and central part of the LT indicate that the leading edge of the LT was aligned relatively W-E. When compared with the reference pole at 70 Ma for Eurasia, this new paleopole suggests that crustal shortening between the Shiquanhe area and stable Asia was 1,500 ± 800 km. This is supported by the crustal shortening (600-1,000 km) absorbed by Cenozoic thrust and fold belts within this area, indicating that the magnitude of crustal shortening within Asia north of the India-Asia suture zone was similar in the central and western part of the plateau. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To better constrain the evolution of the Mongol‐Okhotsk suture, we carried out new paleomagnetic studies on Sharilyn Formation (~155 Ma) and Tsagantsav Formation (~130 Ma) in southern Mongolia, Amuria Block (AMU), and Tuchengzi Formation (~140 Ma) and Dadianzi/Yixian Formation (~130 Ma) in the Yanshan belt, North China Block (NCB). A total of 719 collected samples (from 100 sites) were subjected to stepwise thermal demagnetization. After a low‐temperature component of viscous magnetic remanence acquired in the recent field was removed, the stable high‐temperature components were isolated from most samples. The high‐temperature components from each rock unit passed a fold test and a reversal test, indicating their primary origins. The corresponding paleomagnetic poles were thus calculated. For AMU, the ~155 Ma pole is at 74.7°N/232.5°E (A95 = 3.7°), the ~130 Ma pole at 74.6°N/194.7°E (A95 = 2.9°); for the NCB, the ~140 Ma pole is at 82.7°N/208.6°E (A95 = 4.3°), the ~130 Ma pole at 80.5°N/197.4°E (A95 = 2.3°). By combining our new results with the published data, we refined the 155–100 Ma segment of the apparent polar wander paths for AMU and NCB, which can demonstrate that these two blocks have been tectonically coherent (AMU‐NCB) during 155–100 Ma. Comparison of the apparent polar wander paths, however, revealed a latitudinal plate convergence of 14.3° ± 6.9° and ~19.0° relative rotation between Siberia and the AMU‐NCB after ~155 Ma. Large‐scale latitudinal convergence likely ceased by ~130 Ma, although some relative rotation between them continued along the Mongol‐Okhotsk suture until ~100 Ma. Key Points: New paleomagnetic data from the Amuria Block (AMU) provide the straightforward constraints on the evolution of Mongol‐Okhotsk suture (MOS)New data demonstrate that AMU and North China Block remained the tectonically coherence during Late Jurassic‐Early CretaceousWe provide a reconstruction of Siberia, AMU, and NCB and propose a new subduction‐collision tectonic model of the MOS at some key times [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]