Search

This paper reports a study of the premedical student culture at a major university, based on fieldwork and interviews with 30 premedical students. The paper examines the role of stereotypes in the premedical culture; specifically, the common belief in "cut-throats" among premedical students. Cut-throats are described as excessively competitive, selfish, gradehungry students who cheat, steal books and lab reports, and sabotage lab experiments. Despite the widespread belief, our findings suggest cut-throats are a myth. We found more evidence for cooperative than cut-throat behavior. The myth emerges from the competitive and pressured situation of premedical students and the uncertainty of the medical school admission process, and is in part a manifestation of students' collective anxiety. More significantly, it provides cultural explanations for failure and success for premedical students. We discuss its connection to the general premedical stereotype and its relation to pre-medical education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is a critique of recent service-intensive shelter programs for homeless mothers and the policies that underlie these shelters. We first document the process by which mental health problems and family homelessness became so closely but mistakenly linked. We then demonstrate empirically that shelter programs for homeless families nonetheless presume that mental health problems are part of the causal nexus of family homelessness and indiscriminately deliver mental health services to homeless mothers. Simultaneously, shelter programs encourage the isolation of their residents from what they presume to be their "problematic" social networks. We show that, while mental health services had little impact on depression levels among homeless mothers, isolation from social networks did increase depression among homeless mothers. Our findings suggest that policy should put more emphasis on rapid reintegration into the community through providing housing, and it should put less emphasis on providing services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the process of psychiatric diagnosis in a community mental health center walk-in clinic. The results indicate a great deal of conflict and contradiction in the psychiatric evaluation. This is discussed in light of several tensions: (1) mixed agendas surrounding diagnosis; (2) conflict between training and professional practice; (3) conflict created when a public facility is staffed by an elite medical school; (4) conflict between providing mental health services while serving the needs of other public agencies and mandates; and (5) conflict between an ascendant biopsychiatric model and the daily work of clinical therapeutic service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]