Search

This paper attempts to explain the higher psychological distress and psychological vulnerability of women and the unmarried as a function of greater exposure to uncontrollable life events (including network events) and perceived lack of control over life circumstances. Panel data on a sample of 1,106 adult heads of household living in Chicago provide measures of relevant variables. Contrary to expectation, event exposure is inconsistently associated with gender and marital status; instead, exposure depends on the types of roles held by individuals. Although group members at higher risk of disturbance perceive less control over their lives, these perceptions neither singly nor jointly with event exposure, explain gender or marital status differences in psychological distress or in vulnerability to negative events in general. In light of these findings, the utilities of a "common stress" and a "unique stress" approach for explaining status differences in symptoms are contrasted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infant health problems are a persistent concern across the United States, disproportionally affecting socioeconomically vulnerable communities. We investigate how inequalities in infant health contribute to differences in interneighborhood commuting mobility and shape neighborhoods' embeddedness in the citywide structure of employment networks in Chicago over a 14-year period. We use the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer–Household Dynamics' Origin–Destination Employment Statistics to analyze commuting networks between 2002 and 2015. Results from longitudinal network analyses indicate two main patterns. First, after the Great Recession, a community's infant health problems began to significantly predict isolation from the citywide employment network. Second, pairwise dissimilarity in infant health problems predicts a lower likelihood of mobility ties between communities throughout the entire study period. The findings suggest that infant health problems present a fundamental barrier for communities in equally accessing the full range of jobs and opportunities across the city—compounding existing inequalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although considerable evidence shows that residential segregation is deleterious to the health of African Americans, findings regarding segregation and health for Hispanic Americans are inconsistent. Competing hypotheses regarding the effects of neighborhood segregation on health are tested with data from Puerto Rican and Mexican American residents of Chicago. Multilevel analyses reveal that segregation is associated with more health problems for Puerto Rican Americans but not for Mexican Americans. In addition, the relationship between segregation and health was conditioned by generational status for Mexican Americans: Second- or later-generation Mexican Americans living in highly segregated neighborhoods had better health than first-generation Mexican Americans in such neighborhoods. These findings reveal that residential segregation has differential effects across Hispanic groups and suggest that a high degree of contact with Mexican Americans promotes health by facilitating flow of informal health resources and social support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]