1. Redo Scoring for Prediction of Success of Redo-Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty in Patients with Mitral Restenosis.
- Author
-
Mahfouz RA, Elawady W, Goda M, and Moustafa T
- Subjects
- Echocardiography methods, Female, Humans, Male, Mitral Valve diagnostic imaging, Mitral Valve physiopathology, Mitral Valve Stenosis diagnosis, Mitral Valve Stenosis etiology, Mitral Valve Stenosis physiopathology, Patient Selection, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Quality Improvement, Recurrence, Research Design standards, Balloon Valvuloplasty adverse effects, Balloon Valvuloplasty methods, Mitral Valve surgery, Mitral Valve Stenosis surgery, Reoperation methods, Reoperation statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Echocardiographic predictors of redo-percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (redo-PBMV) have not been well studied, and indications are based mainly on Wilkins score. The study aim was to evaluate the immediate results of redo-PMBV and to introduce a simplified redo-score to predict the success of redo-PBMV., Methods: Two cohorts of symptomatic patients (derivation group, n = 218; validation group, n = 100) who had undergone redo-PBMV at a mean of 8.1 ± 2.9 years after a first successful PBMV were enrolled in the study. The mean Wilkins scores were 8.5 ± 1.7 in the derivation group and 8.4 ± 1.8 in the validation group. PBMV was performed using a multi-track technique. Independent echocardiographic predictors of outcome were assigned a points value: mitral valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (2 points), posterior mitral valve leaflet length (PMVL)/anterior mitral valve leaflet length (AMVL) ratio ≤1/2 (2 points), doming distance ≤12 mm (3 points), mitral annular calcification (mild = 1 point; moderate = 2 points; severe = 3 points), commissural status (no fusion = 0 points; uni-fusion = 2 points; bi-fusion = 3 points) and chordal length ≤10 mm (2 points)., Results: The minimum score was 5 and the maximum was 13. A receiver operating curve analysis showed the redo score to be highly significant in predicting redo-PBMV immediate results. The cut-off value of redo score to predict a favorable outcome was ≤8, with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 85% in the derivation cohort, and a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 83% in the validation cohort. A Wilkins score ≤8 had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 59% in the derivation cohort, while sensitivity was 70% and specificity 62% in the validation cohort., Conclusions: The described scoring system was significantly more predictive than the Wilkins score, and was particularly valuable in predicting outcome in patients with a prior PBMV. It may serve as a satisfactory scoring system for correctly selecting patients with mitral restenosis for PBMV.
- Published
- 2017