Search

Intellectual disability (ID) is a genetic and clinically heterogeneous common disease and underlying molecular pathogenesis can frequently not be identified by whole-exome/genome testing. Here, we report four siblings born to a consanguineous union who presented with intellectual disability and discuss the METAP1pathway as a novel etiology of ID. Genomic analyses demonstrated that patients harbor a novel homozygous nonsense mutation in the gene METAP1. METAP1codes for methionine aminopeptidase 1 (MetAP1) which oversees the co-translational excision of the first methionine remnants in eukaryotes. The loss-of-function mutations to this gene may result in a defect in the translation of many essential proteins within a cell. Improper neuronal function resulting from this loss of essential proteins could lead to neurologic impairment and ID.

The fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene has previously been associated with a variety of diseases and conditions, notably obesity, acute coronary syndrome and metabolic syndrome. Reports describing mutations in FTOas well as in FTO animal models have further demonstrated a role for FTO in the development of the brain and other organs. Here, we describe a patient born of consanguineous union who presented with microcephaly, developmental delay, behavioral abnormalities, dysmorphic facial features, hypotonia and other various phenotypic abnormalities. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous missense mutation in FTOand a nonsense mutation in the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). Exome copy number variation analysis revealed no disease-causing large duplications or deletions within coding regions. Patient’s, her parents’ and non-related control’ fibroblasts were analyzed for morphologic defects, abnormal proliferation, apoptosis and transcriptome profile. We have shown that FTO is located in the nucleus of cells from each tested sample. Western blot analysis demonstrated no changes in patient FTO. Quantitative (qPCR) analysis revealed slightly decreased levels of FTO expression in patient cells compared with controls. No morphological or proliferation differences between the patient and control fibroblasts were observed. There is still much to be learned about the molecular mechanisms by which mutations in FTOcontribute to such severe phenotypes.