Search

• We summarized and discussed about antimony pollution in water environment and its sources. • Research on toxicity of antimony was documented. • Occurrence and biogeochemistry of antimony in water environment were discussed. Antimony, the compounds of which exhibit toxicity, finds extensive usage in industrial processes for flame retardants, plastics, batteries, electronic components, and mechanical bearings. Consequently, mining and industrial activities contribute to the continuous migration of antimony into aquatic environments, influencing the Earth's biogeochemical cycle. Given China's status as the primary global exporter of antimony, the country confronts the challenge of water pollution arising from intensive antimony mining operations. This paper focuses on the latest advances in research concerning antimony toxicity, identifies potential sources of antimony water pollution, and explores its migration pathways and biogeochemistry. Moreover, the study provides estimations of antimony quantities in different compartments. Finally, we discuss the prospects for enhancing our comprehension of antimony's biogeochemical behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Sb concentrations varied with aquifers, whereas As differed seasonally. • Sb and As co-pollution types were identified by cluster analysis. • Mine activities have significant impacts on karst groundwater geochemistry. • Elevated SO 4 2− was related to Sb pollution indicated by tracing sulfate sources. The elevated levels of antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in groundwater caused by mine activities is of particular global concern. Understanding pollution mechanism of Sb and As related to mine activities and their influence on karst groundwater geochemistry is of great significance. However, it is still unclear. To address such questions, Sb and As and major ions, δ34S and δ18O of dissolved sulfate as well as δD and δ18O of water were analyzed for groundwater sampled from three main karst aquifers at the Xikuangshan (XKS) antimony mine from 2013 to 2017. Spatial and temporal variations of Sb and As of the three main karst aquifers were characterized as that, (1) Sb concentrations, rather than As, varied with aquifers, with high Sb (1–50 mg/L) of the D 3 s2 and C 1 y3 aquifers and low Sb (0.01–1.0 mg/L) of the D 3 x4 aquifer; (2) As concentrations had significant seasonal effect that was higher in winter and lower in summer, whereas Sb concentrations did not differ seasonally. Here we applied a recently developed cluster analysis method as well as geochemical indicators to identify pollution types of Sb and As in groundwater related to complex mine activities, and further to reveal main effects on karst groundwater geochemistry. The cluster analysis yielded a classification of four clusters, which was confirmed by principal component analysis. The groundwater of cluster 3 is of weakly alkaline HCO 3 -Ca type with low Sb (<0.015 mg/L) and low As (<0.005 mg/L), which is typical karst groundwater controlled by limestone dissolution. Whereas the other three clusters with high concentrations of Sb and As were identified to represent three pollution patterns dominated by oxidative dissolution of stibnite, leaching of mine wastes, and mixed pollution, respectively. Moreover, the effects of long-term mine activities on karst groundwater geochemistry are revealed, including: (1) Hydrogeochemical compositions of groundwater changed from HCO 3 -Ca type to SO 4 -Ca type. (2) Sulfuric acid significantly participated in carbonate weathering. (3) Weathering of silicate (main as silicified limestone) by H 2 CO 3 and H 2 SO 4 was accelerated. (4) Cation-exchange was enhanced to dominate groundwater geochemistry. Another striking finding is that sulfur and oxygen isotopes of sulfate can effectively distinguish sulfate sources related to mine activities and to trace Sb sources in karst groundwater. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]