Search

BACKGROUND In hypertensive patients, an impairment of midwall myocardial mechanics was described in presence of left ventricular (LV) concentric geometry. Under these circumstances, also LV longitudinal dysfunction was found. PURPOSE Our aim was to evaluate longitudinal and circumferential systolic function and correlations between these two functional components in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients without clinically defined LV hypertrophy (LVH). One hundred and thirty-eight newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive patients without LVH and a control group of 105 healthy normotensive individuals underwent two-dimensional and speckle tracking echocardiography. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was derived (in absolute value) and midwall fractional shortening (MFS) computed. In addition, the hypertensive population was divided into two groups according to GLS: normal GLS (≥20%, n = 94) and reduced GLS (

BACKGROUND In hypertensive patients, high left ventricular (LV) mass/end-diastolic volume ratio (LVM/EDV) is related to LV dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis. PURPOSE We examined the ability of 3D-echo-derived LVM/EDV ratio in identifying early systolic and diastolic dysfunction in relation with LV concentric geometry in native hypertensive patients. METHODS One-hundred and forty-four newly diagnosed, never treated hypertensive patients underwent 2D-echo, including computation of 2D-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS), and 3D-echo. The study population was divided into two groups: elevated 3D-LVM/EDV (≥1.23 in women and ≥1.22 in men), corresponding to LV concentric geometry (n = 50), and normal ratio (

BACKGROUND Elevated left ventricular (LV) mass/end-diastolic volume ratio (LVM/EDV) has been associated with higher evidence of myocardial fibrosis and dysfunction in hypertensive patients by cardiac magnetic resonance, a technique with limited availability. OBJECTIVES We investigated the ability of three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography in identifying a phenotype of LV concentric geometry according to LVM/EDV ratio, possibly detecting early myocardial damage in native-hypertensive patients. METHODS One hundred and twenty-eight native-hypertensive patients underwent 2D and 3D-echocardiography. The population was divided into two groups, according to cut-off point values of 3D-LVM/EDV ratio corresponding to its upper 95% confidence interval in a population of 90 healthy normotensive individuals: LVM/EDV ratio cut-off was 1.22 in men and 1.23 in women. RESULTS An increased 3D-LVM/EDV ratio identified a higher rate of LV concentric geometry in comparison with 2D-derived relative wall thickness (37 versus 24%, P = 0.03). Patients with LVM/EDV ratio of 1.22 or more in men and 1.23 or more in women were significantly older, had smaller 3D-LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and higher LV mass index, without difference in ejection fraction. 3D-stroke volume (P

Objectives: Little is known about the impact of pulse pressure on left ventricular systolic function. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether high pulse pressure is associated with subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: The study population included 143 participants (68 newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive, and 75 normotensive individuals) evaluated by echo-Doppler, including determination of global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking. According to pulse pressure tertiles, participants were divided in two groups: the first group merging the first and second pulse pressure tertiles (n = 93, pulse pressure

BACKGROUND Myocardial mechanical efficiency can be measured as the ratio between systolic work and energy consumption. We evaluated the relation between myocardial mechanical efficiency and left ventricular (LV) mass in untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS Myocardial work was estimated in 256 normotensive (35 +/- 12 years) and 306 hypertensive patients (47 +/- 10 years) with normal ejection fraction, as stroke work in gram-meters (stroke work = BPs x SV x 0.0144, where BPs is systolic blood pressure, SV is echocardiographic stroke volume). Myocardial O2 consumption was estimated as the product of heart rate (HR) x BPs (eMVO2). Myocardial mechanical efficiency was estimated as the ratio of stroke work/eMVO2, which can be simplified and expressed as ml/s. RESULTS LV mass was greater in hypertensive than in normotensive patients (46 +/- 13 vs. 38 +/- 11 g/m2.7, P < 0.0001), but myocardial mechanical efficiency was identical (85 +/- 23 vs. 86 +/- 26 ml/s). Relations between myocardial mechanical efficiency and LV mass were close (both P < 0.0001), but more scattered among hypertensive patients because of 56 patients exhibiting low myocardial mechanical efficiency relative to the magnitude of LV mass. At comparable age and body size, these patients had higher HR, BPs, and pulse pressure than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for age and sex, hypertensive patients with low myocardial mechanical efficiency showed greater relative wall thickness and lower ejection fraction and midwall shortening than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). Low myocardial mechanical efficiency was also associated with inappropriately high LV mass (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In some hypertensive patients the left ventricle works inefficiently with a high energy wasting, at the same level of LV mass as hypertensive patients with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency. Those patients feature a high cardiovascular risk phenotype, with concentric LV geometry, systolic dysfunction, and indirect signs of more severe vascular impairment.

BACKGROUND Left ventricular mass (LVM) exceeding needs to sustain haemodynamic load has been termed 'inappropriate left ventricular mass'. We hypothesized that inappropriate LVM identifies hypertensive patients with clustered cardiac geometric and functional abnormalities. METHODS For this purpose, 359 hypertensive individuals without prevalent cardiovascular disease underwent Doppler echocardiography. Observed LVM exceeding more than 28% of the value predicted for individual cardiac work, body size and sex was defined as inappropriate LVM. Concentric left ventricular geometry was defined as age-adjusted relative wall thickness (RWT) greater than 0.40. Systolic dysfunction was defined as ejection fraction less than 50% or midwall shortening less than 14.7%. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) greater than 100 ms, E-velocity deceleration time greater than 220 ms or age and heart rate-normalized early/late (E/A) ratio less than 0.66. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined as an LVM index greater than 49.2 g/m2.7 in men and 46.7 g/m2.7 in women. RESULTS As expected, inappropriate LVM was associated with higher RWT, lower left ventricular systolic function, longer IVRT and prolonged E-deceleration time (all P < 0.05). Patients with inappropriate LVM had a higher prevalence of concentric geometry (65.5 versus 40.4%), systolic dysfunction (67.9 versus 47.4%) and diastolic dysfunction (46.4 versus 39%; all P < 0.001) than those with LVH. Inappropriate LVM had greater sensitivity (0.89 versus 0.54) and specificity (0.82 versus 0.62; both P < 0.01) than LVH in identifying patients with clustered left ventricular concentric geometry, systolic and diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate LVM is associated with a cluster of concentric left ventricular geometry, delayed left ventricular relaxation and reduced systolic performance. Compared with LVH, inappropriate LVM is more accurate at identifying patients with clustered left ventricular geometric and functional abnormalities.

Because of new evidence on several diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hypertension, the present guidelines differ in many respects from the previous ones. Some of the most important differences are listed below: 1. Epidemiological data on hypertension and BP control in Europe. 2. Strengthening of the prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and of its role for diagnosis and management of hypertension, next to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). 3. Update of the prognostic significance of night-time BP, white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. 4. Re-emphasis on integration of BP, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage (OD) and clinical complications for total CV risk assessment. 5. Update of the prognostic significance of asymptomatic OD, including heart, blood vessels, kidney, eye and brain. 6. Reconsideration of the risk of overweight and target body mass index (BMI) in hypertension. 7. Hypertension in young people. 8. Initiation of antihypertensive treatment. More evidence-based criteria and no drug treatment of high normal BP. 9. Target BP for treatment. More evidence-based criteria and unified target systolic blood pressure (SBP) (

1. INTRODUCTION1.1 PrinciplesThe 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines continue to adhere to some fundamental principles that inspired the 2003 and 2007 guidelines, namely to base recommendations on properly conducted studies identified from an ext