Search

Aims: Clinical guidelines support the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Implementation of FDC into clinical care remains challenging, and current population-based data are scarce., Methods and Results: Claims data on dispensed drugs in an outpatient care setting of approximately 87% of the German population were analysed regarding the use of FDC according to time, age of the insured persons, and active ingredients. The overarching trend for all FDC revealed a decrease from 77.3 defined daily doses per 1000 statutory health-insured (SHI) persons per day (DID) in the second half-year of 2018 (2018HY02) to 60.8 DID in the first half-year of 2023 (2023HY01) (Spearman ρ = -0.988; P  < 0.001). The total DID for all antihypertensives (AHT) increased from 590.6 in 2018HY02 to 624.8 in 2023HY01 (ρ = 0.855; P  = 0.002), but the DID for fixed-dose AHT (AHT-FDC) declined from 74.1 in 2018HY02 to 55.0 in 2023HY01 (ρ = -0.988; P  < 0.001). Conversely, the use of all lipid-lowering agents (LLA) and LLA-FDC continuously increased: The total DID of all LLA rose from 92.5 in 2018HY02 to 134.4 in 2023HY01 (ρ = 1.000; P  = 0.000), and for LLA-FDC from 3.1 in 2018HY02 to 5.5 DID in 2023HY01 (ρ = 0.915; P  < 0.001). AHT-FDC and LLA-FDC were less frequently dispensed to patients at least 80 years than to patients less than 80 years. Dispensing of multiple purpose FDC increased from 2018HY02 to 2023HY01 from 0.11 DID to 0.26 DID (ρ = 1.000; P  = 0.000) but remained negligible., Conclusion: Use of AHT-FDC in Germany is declining. In contrast, FDC containing LLA are increasingly prescribed. Dispensing of multiple purpose FDC is very low. Strategies are needed to facilitate the use of FDC as recommended by current guidelines., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability associates with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. We investigated the role of seasonal BP modifications on the magnitude of BP variability and its impact on cardiovascular risk., Methods: In 25 390 patients included in the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials, the on-treatment systolic (S) BP values obtained by five visits during the first two years of the trials were grouped according to the month in which they were obtained. SBP differences between winter and summer months were calculated for BP variability quintiles (Qs), as quantified by the coefficient of variation (CV) of on-treatment mean SBP from the five visits. The relationship of BP variability with the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality was assessed by the Cox regression model., Results: SBP was approximately 4 mmHg lower in summer than in winter regardless of confounders. Winter/summer SBP differences contributed significantly to each SBP-CV quintile. Increase of SBP-CV from Q1 to Q5 was associated with a progressive increase in the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the primary endpoint of the trials, i.e. morbid and fatal cardiovascular events. This association was even stronger after removal of the effect of seasonality from the calculation of SBP-CV. A similar trend was observed for secondary endpoints., Conclusions: Winter/summer SBP differences significantly contribute to visit-to-visit BP variability. However, this contribution does not participate in the adverse prognostic significance of visit-to-visit BP variations, which seems to be more evident after removal of the BP effects of seasonality from visit-to-visit BP variations., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Document Reviewers: Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Sang Hyun Ihm (South Korea), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China)., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Pharmacovigilance reports, associating hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) with skin cancer, resulted in a significant decrease of HCT prescriptions for hypertension and heart failure. Whether HCT exhibits phototoxic properties thereby causing skin cancer remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the photosensitizing, phototoxic and carcinogenic potential of HCT in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in vivo and also in vitro ., Methods: The trial assigned 30 healthy, normotensive adult volunteers in a 2:1 ratio to either HCT 25 mg/day or placebo for 15 days. Photosensitivity of the skin with and without the effect of HCT treatment were assessed. Following whole-body ultraviolet A (UVA) and B (UVB, 311 nm) irradiation, phototoxic and carcinogenic reactions by measuring urinary excretion of pyrimidine dimers were evaluated. For the in-vitro studies, human keratinocytes (HaCaT) were incubated with HCT, irradiated with UVB, and analysed for markers of inflammation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis., Results: Skin photosensitivity following exposure to UVA and UVB remained unchanged from baseline to 15-day follow-up in both groups (UVA change HCT 0.0 J/cm 2 vs. placebo 0.0 J/cm 2 ; P  = 0.99; UVB change HCT 0.0 J/cm 2 vs. placebo -0.2 J/cm 2 ; P  = 0.06). Pyrimidine dimers were not detected in either group. In vitro , combination of HCT and UVB irradiation did not induce the expression of oxidative stress marker proteins, inflammatory proteins, apoptotic proteins or activation of oncoproteins., Conclusion: HCT did not increase photosensitivity for UVA or UVB in healthy volunteers compared with placebo, and was not associated with phototoxic or carcinogenic reactions. In vitro , HCT was also not associated with phototoxicity or carcinogenesis (NCT04654312)., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has been suggested to induce photosensitivity, thereby increasing the incidence of skin cancers. After a pharmacovigilance alert, HCT was frequently withdrawn or substituted by other diuretics. The aim of this study was to compare the association of exposure to HCT with cancer risk versus alternative diuretics., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on data from the AOK PLUS, a large German statutory health insurance fund. Patients with HCT treatment were propensity score matching to patients using non-HCT diuretics. Incidence of cancer of any kind and, specifically, skin cancer was assessed in both groups. Time-to-incident cancer diagnosis was evaluated and compared between the groups., Results: A total of 199 708 patients were included in the final analysis ( n  = 76 855 in the HCT group; n  = 122 853 in the non-HCT-diuretics group). After propensity score matching, 122 554 patients remained in the sample ( n  = 61 277 for both groups, of which >96% had hypertension, mean age 73 years, 61% female). HCT treatment was associated with a lower incidence of cancer of any kind compared with non-HCT diuretics (incidence rate ratio per 100 patient years 0.84 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.87). HCT treatment was associated with a small albeit significantly higher incidence rate ratio of skin cancer (1.15 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.24) with significant variances over time. Although numerically higher, the difference accounts to only 0.05 more skin cancer diagnoses in 100 patient-years., Conclusion: HCT treatment compared with alternative diuretics was associated with a lower all-cancer risk and a numerically small increased skin cancer risk in a large German population. Risk-benefit evaluation should be executed in patients with increased skin cancer risk and treatment with HCT. Furthermore, advice for skin protection is warranted in all patients taking thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sustained blood pressure reductions after radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation (RDN) have been reported to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. However, mechanistic data to support procedural durability are lacking. We aimed to quantify the long-term nerve anatomic and functional effects of RF RDN in a preclinical model., Methods: Bilateral RF RDN was performed in 20 normotensive swine. Renal tissue samples were obtained in the RDN-treated groups at 7 ( n  = 6), 28 ( n  = 6), and 180 days ( n  = 8) postprocedure for quantification of cortical norepinephrine (NE) levels and renal cortical axon density. Tissue fibrosis, necrosis and downstream nerve fiber atrophy (axonal loss) were also scored for each sample. Three additional untreated groups ( n  = 6, n  = 6 and n  = 8, respectively) served as control., Results: Pathologic nerve changes were characterized by necrosis in the ablated region at 7 days that partially resolved by 28 days and fully resolved at 180 days. Axonal loss was apparent within and downstream to the ablation regions and was evident at 7, 28 and 180 days in the main vessel and branch vessels. Consequently, renal cortical axon density and corresponding cortical NE levels were significantly reduced at 7 days in the RDN vs. control group and remained suppressed at 180 days., Conclusions: Reductions in renal NE, cortical axon density and downstream axonal loss caused by axonal destruction persisted through 180 days post-RDN in a normotensive swine model. These results suggest functional nerve regrowth after RF RDN is unlikely and support published clinical evidence that the procedure results in durable blood pressure reduction., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

This ESH Position Paper 2021 with updated proposed recommendations was deemed necessary after the publication of a set of new pivotal sham-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which provided important information about the efficacy and safety of endovascular device-based renal denervation (RDN) for hypertension treatment. RDN is effective in reducing or interrupting the sympathetic signals to the kidneys and decreasing whole body sympathetic activity. Five independent, fully completed, sham-controlled RCTs provide conclusive evidence that RDN lowers ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP) to a significantly greater extent than sham treatment. BP-lowering efficacy is evident both in patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. The average decrease of 10 mmHg in office BP is estimated to lower the incidence of cardiovascular events by 25-30%, based on meta-analyses of RCTs using pharmacological treatment. Neither peri-procedural, nor short-term or long-term adverse events or safety signals (available up to 3 years) have been observed. Implementing RDN as an innovative third option in the armamentarium of antihypertensive treatment requires a structured process that ensures the appropriate performance of the endovascular RDN procedure and adequate selection of hypertensive patients. The latter should also incorporate patients' perspective and preference that needs to be respected in a shared decision-making process., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify potentially targetable psychosocial factors associated with nonadherence to prescribed antihypertensive medications in patients presenting with hypertensive urgencies at an emergency department., Methods: This prospective study included patients treated with antihypertensive drugs who presented with hypertensive urgencies (SBP ≥180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥110 mmHg) at the emergency department of a tertiary referral clinic between April 2018 and April 2019. Health literacy was assessed using the Newest Vital Sign test. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to quantify symptoms of anxiety and depression. Patients were classified nonadherent if less than 80% of the prescribed antihypertensive drugs were detectable in urine or plasma using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry., Results: A total of 104 patients (62% women) presenting with hypertensive urgencies with a median SBP of 200 mmHg (IQR 190-212) and DBP of 97.5 mmHg (IQR 87-104) were included. Twenty-five patients (24%) were nonadherent to their antihypertensive medication. Nonadherent patients were more often men (66 versus 23%, P = 0.039), prescribed higher numbers of antihypertensive drugs (median 3, IQR 3-4 versus 2, IQR 1-3; P < 0.001), and more often treated with calcium channel blockers (76 versus 25%; P < 0.001) and/or diuretics (64 versus 40%; P = 0.030). There was no difference in health literacy (P = 0.904) or the scores on the HADS subscales for depression (P = 0.319) and anxiety (P = 0.529) between adherent and nonadherent patients., Conclusion: Male sex, higher numbers of antihypertensive drugs, and treatment with diuretics and/or calcium channel blockers were associated with nonadherence. We did not identify a specific psychosocial characteristic associated with nonadherence., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guidelines recommend to start blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs also according to cardiovascular risk including history of cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, both or none of those, the index events predict the next event and have different SBP risk associations to different cardiovascular outcomes., Design and Measurements: In this pooled posthoc, nonprespecified analysis, we assessed outcome data from high-risk patients aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular events or proven cardiovascular disease, randomized to the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial and to Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease Trial investigating telmisartan, ramipril and their combination with a median follow-up of 56 months. Standardized office BP was measured every 6 months. Associations of mean achieved BP on treatment were investigated on MI, stroke and cardiovascular death. We identified patients with previous MI (N = 13 487), stroke (N = 4985), both (N = 1509) or none (N = 10 956) of these index events. Analyses were done by Cox regression, analysis of variance and Chi2-test. 30 937 patients with complete data were enrolled between 1 December 2001 and 31 July 2003, and followed until 31 July 2008. Data of both trials were pooled as the outcomes were similar., Results: Patients with MI as index event had a higher risk to experience a second MI [hazard ratio 1.42 (confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.69), P < 0.0001] compared with patients with no events but no increased risk for a stroke as a next event [hazard ratio 0.95 (CI 0.73-1.23), n.s.]. The risk was roughly doubled when they had both, MI and stroke before [hazard ratio 2.07 (CI 1.58-2.71), P < 0.0001]. Patients with a stroke history had a roughly three-fold higher likelihood to experience a second stroke [hazard ratio 2.89 (CI 2.37-3.53) P < 0.0001] but not MI [hazard ratio 1.07 (CI 0.88-1.32), n.s.]. Both types of index events increased roughly three-fold the risk of a second stroke compared with no previous events. The SBP-risk relationship was not meaningfully altered by the event history. After MI and stroke the risk for subsequent events and cardiovascular death was increased over the whole SBP spectrum. A J-shape relationship between BP and outcome was only observed for cardiovascular death., Conclusion: Previous MI and previous stroke are associated with increased risk for the same event in the future, independent of achieved SBP. Thus, secondary prevention may also be chosen according to the event history of patients., Clinical Trial Registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00153101., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetes and hypertension are risk factors for renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Data on the association of achieved blood pressure (BP) with renal outcomes in patients with and without diabetes are sparse. We investigated the association of achieved SBP, DBP with renal outcomes and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in people with vascular disease., Methods: In this pooled analysis, we assessed renal outcome data from high-risk patients aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular disease, 70% of whom had hypertension, randomized to The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial and to Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease trials investigating telmisartan, ramipril and their combination with a median follow-up of 56 months. Standardized office BP was measured every 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and UAE at baseline, 2 years and study end. Associations of mean achieved BP on treatment were investigated on major renal outcomes including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), decline of eGFR by at least 40%, doubling of creatinine and the composites thereof and on UAE. Analyses were by Cox regression analysis, analysis of variance and Chi2-test. Of 30 937 patients with complete data, 19 450 patients without and 11 487 with diabetes were enrolled between 1 December 2001 and 31 July 2003 and followed until 31 July 2008. Data were pooled as the outcomes for telmisartan 80 mg/day (n = 2903) or placebo (n = 2907) for Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease and ramipril 10 mg/day (n = 8407), telmisartan 80 mg/day (n = 8386) or the combination of both (n = 8334) were similar., Results: For both those with and without diabetes, the hazard ratios for the composites ESRD or doubling of serum creatinine (707 events overall) and ESRD or 40% eGFR loss (2371 events overall) reached a nadir at achieved SBP of 120 to less than 140 mmHg, and increased with higher and lower SBP with similar relative risk with or without diabetes. For example, risk for the former composite reached a hazard ratios 3.06 (confidence interval 1.90-4.92) with a mean achieved SBP more than 160 mmHg compared with 120 to less than 130 mmHg with diabetes and hazard ratios 2.14 (1.09-4.26) without diabetes. In contrast, the development of new microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (3002 and 846 events overall) associated linearly over the whole range of achieved SBP (apart from a slight increase in risk at SBP less than 120 mmHg only in those without diabetes). Absolute risks for the composite and albuminuria outcomes were consistently greater in those with diabetes as compared with without diabetes with high event rates over the whole SBP spectrum. The increased renal risk at low SBP was not related to a meaningful reduction of mandated study drugs or open label renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition., Conclusion: In patients at high cardiovascular risk, SBP levels more than 140 mmHg and less than 120 are associated with increased risk for renal outcomes. Renal risk was greater in diabetes across the whole range of achieved SBP and DBP. These data suggest similar target BP range in patients with and without diabetes to prevent renal outcomes, a frequent complication in high-risk vascular patients., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Trial registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov.Unique identifier: NCT00153101., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Resting heart rate (HR) taken in the office has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population, hypertension and heart failure. It is unknown whether 24-h oscillographic pulse rate measurement as an approximation of HR derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) associates with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients., Methods: We evaluated ABPM recordings from 56 901 patients with complete 3373 421 HR measures entering the final analysis from the Spanish Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry for a median follow-up time of 5.1 years. We explored the association of office HR, mean 24-h HR, mean day HR, mean night HR as well as day-night HR differences, morning mean HR, morning HR surge and night peak HR to all-cause death, cardiovascular death and noncardiovascular death. Data were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, analysis of variance and chi-square test., Results: The Spanish ABPM Registry recorded data in 223 primary care centers in Spain from 2004 until 31 December 2014 at the end of recruitment. Office HR was 3.5 bpm higher than mean 24-h HR, office mean HR versus mean night was 10.4 bpm higher and mean day versus mean night HR 9.3 bpm higher, while there were no relevant difference between office and mean day HR. Office mean, 24-h day and night HR more than 90 bpm were associated with an increased risk for all-cause and noncardiovascular death, whereas for cardiovascular death only mean night HR was predictive. The strongest association to all-cause death was observed with mean night HR [hazard ratio 3.80 (2.87-5.03)], mean 24-h HR [2.85 (2.30-3.54)] and mean day HR [2.22 (1.83-2.70)]. Day-night dipping of more than 8 bpm was associated with a 20% lesser risk on all-cause, cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death. Results were robust after adjusting for relevant risk indicators., Conclusion: HR parameters derived from ABPM provide important information, in particular association with death by mean night HR, mean 24-h HR and reduced day-night HR dipping less than 8 bpm superior to office HR.

Background: Resting heart rate (HR) associates with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population and in patients with hypertension and heart failure. The accuracy of pulse rate acquired by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM-PR) in comparison with Holter-ECG HR (Holter-HR) is unknown., Objective: We aimed at investigating the accuracy of ABPM-PR when compared with Holter-HR., Methods and Results: The current study included 1500 patients of a general cardiology outpatient unit undergoing simultaneous Holter and ABPM recordings. ABPM-PR differed marginally from Holter-HR by 0.55 bpm for 24-h average [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001], 1.27 bpm for daytime (95% CI: -0.98-1.56, P < 0.001) and 0.63 bpm for night-time (95% CI: 0.40-0.86 bpm; P < 0.001). The absolute delta between 24-h Holter-HR and ABPM-PR was less than 5 and less than 10 bpm in 1363 (91%) and 1458 (97%) patients, respectively. 24-h ABPM-PR more commonly underestimated than overestimated (7 versus 2%) 24-h Holter-HR by at least 5 bpm. The mean difference between Holter-HR and ABPM-PR was higher (+1.9 bpm; 95% CI: 0.9-3.0; P < 0.001) in patients with than without atrial fibrillation. There was no significant difference between Holter-HR and ABPM-PR in patients without supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles (both P ≥ 0.750)., Conclusion: ABPM-PR did not differ clinically meaningful from Holter-HR recordings in most patients and might be useful for risk prediction in hypertension.

Background: The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalizations in type 2 diabetes (T2D) in addition to a reduction of SBP. As heart failure patients often present with low SBP, which can challenge treatment initiation, we explored if empagliflozin's effect on SBP was independent of baseline SBP and heart failure status, and if the effect on cardiovascular and heart failure outcomes was influenced by updated mean SBP or by an early change in SBP after drug initiation., Methods and Results: A total of 7020 patients were treated with empagliflozin 10 mg, 25 mg or placebo and followed for a median of 3.1 years. All of them had BP measurement at baseline. We evaluated changes in SBP in the context of heart failure status at baseline and according to baseline SBP categories (<120, 120--<130, 130--<140, 140--<160, ≥160 mmHg). The updated mean SBP during the trial was calculated as a time-dependent variable. We then assessed the association of baseline and updated mean SBP with three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE), hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and incident/worsening nephropathy, and whether treatment effect of empagliflozin vs. placebo on these outcomes differed if adjusted for updated mean SBP. Finally, we evaluated the impact of early decline in SBP (≥5 mmHg at week 4) on the treatment effect of empagliflozin vs. placebo on these outcomes. Analyses were performed via Cox regression adjusting for baseline risk factors including a term for treatment subgroup interaction, and by landmark analyses starting at week 4. The difference in SBP reduction at week 12 between empagliflozin and placebo was 3--5 mmHg and similar regardless of baseline SBP category or HF status at baseline. Baseline SBP and updated mean SBP categories showed no association with cardiovascular outcomes, but was associated with new/worsening nephropathy. The treatment effects of empagliflozin on all explored outcomes were independent of updated mean SBP as well of the early drop in SBP on treatment., Conclusion: In addition to decreasing SBP, empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular, heart failure and renal outcomes independently of updated mean SBP during the trial, and of the early SBP drop. These results suggest a BP-independent effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and heart failure outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT01131676.

Objective: Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce sympathetic activity and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients, which both have an impact on atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic meta-analysis on the effects of renal denervation (RDN) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation., Methods: All published randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of RDN as adjunctive treatment to PVI for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation were included. Primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial fibrillation after 12 months on average., Results: A total of six randomized controlled studies including 689 patients with hypertension and symptomatic atrial fibrillation were included. In five studies, patients had uncontrolled BP despite prescription of an average of three antihypertensive agents. PVI was performed with irrigated radio-frequency catheters in 387 patients, and in 302 with cryoballoon. Cardiac ablation catheters were used for RDN in 78% of all cases. In the remaining 22%, RDN was performed using a designated, nonirrigated radio-frequency catheter system. After 12 months, the mean odds ratio for recurrence of atrial fibrillation for PVI with RDN compared with PVI alone was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.59). After RDN, BP was reduced significantly whereas no changes were reported in the PVI-only groups. No relevant complications associated to RDN were documented., Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the concept of RDN as an adjunctive treatment for atrial fibrillation. Further studies with standardized PVI and RDN procedures are needed.

Objective: Use of amlodipine for treatment of arterial hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is sometimes limited by occurrence of peripheral edema and headache. We aimed to explore the true magnitude of this phenomenon by determining the rate and placebo-adjusted rate of these side effects., Methods: We performed a meta-analysis by including all randomized, placebo-controlled trials reporting edema and headache with amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension and CAD. Placebo-adjusted rate (%) was determined as follows: (SE amlodipine % - SE placebo %)/SE amlodipine %., Results: Data from 7226 patients of 22 trials were analyzed. Rate of edema was higher on amlodipine vs. placebo (16.6 vs. 6.2%, risk ratio: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.50-3.36, P < 0.0001). The placebo-adjusted rate was 63%, indicating that 37% of edema cases were unrelated to amlodipine. Treatment with low/medium doses (2.5-5 mg) resulted in lower rates of edema (risk ratio: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.41-2.88, P = 0.0001) vs. high dose (10 mg) (risk ratio: 3.08, 95% CI 2.62-3.60, P < 0.0001, Pforinteraction = 0.03). Incidence of headache was reduced using amlodipine vs. placebo (7.9 vs. 10.9%, risk ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, P = 0.002) and was driven by use of low/medium doses (risk ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.69, P < 0.00001 vs. risk ratio: 0.92, 95%-CI: 0.74-1.15, P = 0.45, for high doses, Pforinteraction = 0.002)., Conclusion: Although risks of peripheral edema are three-fold higher on amlodipine, up to one-third of edema cases on amlodipine might not be induced by amlodipine. Headache is reduced on amlodipine treatment, mainly driven by use of this drug at low/medium doses.

Objectives: First-generation radiofrequency renal denervation devices may have had limited efficacy due to incomplete circumferential ablation and dependence on individual operator technique. This study evaluated a next-generation catheter-based technology using ultrasound designed to maximize nerve coverage using circumferential ultrasound energy., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, postmarket study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an endovascular ultrasound renal denervation system (Paradise) in patients who met the European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology definition of resistant hypertension. Major exclusion criteria included renal artery stenosis and renal insufficiency. Patients were followed for 12 months. Safety and efficacy endpoints included procedural safety and renal artery patency, as well as changes in systolic office and 24-h ambulatory bllod pressure (BP) measurement., Results: A total of 96 patients from eight European sites were included. Mean age was 63.9 years and 41% of patients were female. At baseline, mean 24-h ambulatory BP was 156.2/88.4 ± 15.4/12.7 mmHg, and mean office BP was 176.2/95.0 ± 20.6/16.0 mmHg. Patients were on average on 5.1 ± 2.5 antihypertensive agents. At 12 months, the average 24-h ambulatory BP change was -7.5/-3.8 ± 18.3/10.6 mmHg (P = 0.0007; P = 0.0024) with an average office BP change of -15.0/-7.0 ± 27.0/12.3 mmHg (P < 0.0001 for both). At 12 months, there was a single patient death unrelated to the device or procedure., Conclusion: This single-arm study represents the largest cohort of patients treated with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation to date. Within this trial, the therapy appeared safe and resulted in sustained reductions in both office BP and 24-h ambulatory BP through 12 months.

Introduction: Several renal denervation (RDN) systems are currently under investigation for treatment of hypertension by ablation of renal sympathetic nerves. The procedural efficacy of devices, however, is variable and incompletely understood. This study aimed at investigating procedural and anatomical predictors of RDN efficacy by comparing two radiofrequency catheter systems in a porcine model., Methods: Domestic swine were assigned into two treatment groups (n = 10) and one sham group (n = 3). Bilateral RDN in main and in branch segments of renal arteries was performed using two different multielectrode catheter systems [Symplicity Spyral (SPY) and IberisBloom (IBB)]. After 7 days, measurement of norepinephrine (NEPI) tissue concentrations and histological analyses have been performed., Results: Renal NEPI tissue concentration following RDN was significantly reduced when compared with Sham (SPY: -95 ± 3% vs. Sham, P < 0.001; IBB: -88 ± 11% vs. Sham, P < 0.001). Histological evaluation showed comparable lesion depth and lesion area (lesion depth: SPY-main 6.26 ± 1.62 mm vs. SPY-branch 3.49 ± 1.11 mm; IBB-main 5.93 ± 1.88 mm vs. IBB-branch: 3.26 ± 1.26 mm, P < 0.001; lesion area: SPY-main 43.5 ± 29.5 mm vs. SYP-branch 45.0 ± 38.0 mm; IBB-main 52.3 ± 34.8 mm vs. IBB-branch 44.0 ± 42.6 mm, P = 0.77; intergroup SPY vs. IBB, P = 0.73). Histological investigations documented a significant correlation between number of ablations per millimeter length of renal artery and reduction in NEPI tissue concentration., Conclusion: The two devices under investigation demonstrated similar histopathological lesion characteristics and similar reduction of renal NEPI levels. An increase in number of ablations per millmeter length of renal artery resulted in improved efficacy and reduced variability in treatment effects.

: This ESH update was deemed necessary with the publication of new results of sham-controlled randomized blinded prospective trials with renal denervation (RDN). Proof of concept studies and first randomized trials (some were sham-controlled) displayed discrepant results about the efficacy of RDN. Three sham-controlled randomized trials of the 2.0 generation yielded now similarity in the average blood pressure decrease following RDN. Reduction of ambulatory blood pressure was approximately 5 to 7 mmHg and of office blood pressure 10 mmHg. Such a decrease in blood pressure by pharmacologic therapy has been found to be associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular events in particular with respect to heart failure and stroke by roughly 25%. Nevertheless, some questions about renal denervation are unanswered. The heterogeneity of the blood pressure-lowering response point to the clinical need to identify predictors for efficacy, and questions on long-term safety could not have been answered due to the short duration of the sham-controlled randomized clinical trials.

: Document reviewers: Guy De Backer (ESC Review Co-ordinator) (Belgium), Anthony M. Heagerty (ESH Review Co-ordinator) (UK), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Murielle Bochud (Switzerland), Claudio Borghi (Italy), Pierre Boutouyrie (France), Jana Brguljan (Slovenia), Héctor Bueno (Spain), Enrico G. Caiani (Italy), Bo Carlberg (Sweden), Neil Chapman (UK), Renata Cifkova (Czech Republic), John G. F. Cleland (UK), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Ioan Mircea Coman (Romania), Peter W. de Leeuw (The Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (The Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Hans-Christoph Diener (Germany), Maria Dorobantu (Romania), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Csaba Farsang (Hungary), Marc Ferrini (France), Ian M. Graham (Ireland), Guido Grassi (Italy), Hermann Haller (Germany), F. D. Richard Hobbs (UK), Bojan Jelakovic (Croatia), Catriona Jennings (UK), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Abraham A. Kroon (The Netherlands), Christophe Leclercq (France), Dragan Lovic (Serbia), Empar Lurbe (Spain), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Theresa A. McDonagh (UK), Franz Messerli (Switzerland), Maria Lorenza Muiesan (Italy), Uwe Nixdorff (Germany), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Gianfranco Parati (Italy), Joep Perk (Sweden), Massimo Francesco Piepoli (Italy), Jorge Polonia (Portugal), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Stefano F. Rimoldi (Switzerland), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Naveed Sattar (UK), Petar M. Seferovic (Serbia), Iain A. Simpson (UK), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Alice V. Stanton (Ireland), Philippe van de Borne (Belgium), Panos Vardas (Greece), Massimo Volpe (Italy), Sven Wassmann (Germany), Stephan Windecker (Switzerland), Jose Luis Zamorano (Spain).The disclosure forms of all experts involved in the development of these Guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines.

Background/objectives: Short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) is affected by multiple factors including the sympathetic nervous system drive. Regarding the latter, the novel interventional technology of renal denervation (RDN), by modulating the sympathetic system activation, could have a beneficial impact on BPV. The aim of the current study is to review and meta-analyze the available evidence on the effect of RDN on short-term BPV., Methods: We searched Medline/PubMed database until October 2016 for studies with eligible content. We performed random-effect meta-analyses for 12 outcomes of interest: the standard deviation (SD) of SBP (24 h, daytime and night-time) and DBP (24 h, daytime and night-time), the weighted SD of SBP and DBP across 24 h, the coefficient of variation of SBP and DBP across 24 h and the average real variability of SBP and DBP across 24 h., Results: RDN reduced the SD of SBP across 24 h [mean change: -1.212 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): -2.354/-0.071), P = 0.037] and decreased the SD of systolic daytime BP [mean difference: -1.617 (95% CIs: -3.21/-0.026), P = 0.046] and diastolic daytime BP (marginally) [mean difference: -2.605 (95% CIs: -5.21/-0.003), P = 0.05]. The effect of RDN in reducing SD of SBP across 24 h or DBP across daytime was not influenced by absolute or relative reduction in SBP and DBP indices. (P > 0.1 for all)., Conclusion: Catheter-based RDN in resistant hypertensive patients can favorably affect short-term BPV, independent of the level of BP reduction. Further investigation of the effect of RDN on BPV is needed with large randomized trials.

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing, predominantly obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), is highly prevalent in patients with hypertension. OSA may underlie the progression to resistant hypertension, partly due to increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system. This analysis of patients with and without OSA evaluated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of sympathetic modulation by renal denervation (RDN) in a real-world setting., Methods: The Global SYMPLICITY Registry (NCT01534299) is a prospective, open-label, multicenter registry conducted worldwide to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Office and 24-h ambulatory BP were reported for all patients, based on the presence of OSA., Results: Among 1868 patients, self-reported OSA occurred in 205 patients, who were more likely to be men (76 vs 57%, P < 0.001), have a higher BMI (34 ± 6 vs 30 ± 5 kg/m, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (30 vs 21%, P = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (25 vs 15%, P < 0.001), and type 2 diabetes (50 vs 36%, P < 0.001). Among OSA patients, the baseline office SBP (166 ± 26 mmHg) was reduced by 14.0 ± 25.3 mmHg at 6 months (P < 0.001). Ambulatory 24-h SBP was reduced by 4.9 ± 18.0 mmHg (n = 115, P = 0.005) from 155 ± 19 mmHg at baseline. The 6-month change in SBP from baseline was not statistically different between OSA and non-OSA patients. BP reduction after RDN was also similar in OSA patients already treated with and not treated with continuous positive airway pressure., Conclusion: RDN resulted in significant BP reductions at 6 months in hypertensive patients with and without OSA, and regardless of continuous positive airway pressure usage in OSA patients.

Objectives: Data on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of renal denervation (RDN) in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) are limited. Moreover, change of adherence to medication, as one potential confounder of BP response, has never been analyzed rigorously in this group of patients. We analyzed the effect of RDN on BP in patients with moderate TRH who were retrospectively found to be completely adherent to their antihypertensive medication., Methods: Our study cohort comprised 40 patients with moderate TRH [office BP ≥ 140/90 but <160/100 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) ≥130/80 mmHg] who underwent catheter-based RDN. Further major inclusion criterion was complete adherence to their medication (≥80% intake of their prescribed antihypertensive drugs) at baseline (assessed by retrospective toxicological analysis)., Results: Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by -10/-6 mmHg (SBP: 149 ± 6 vs. 139 ± 15 mmHg; DBP: 81 ± 12 vs. 75 ± 10 mmHg; both P < 0.001) and 24-h ABPM by -7/-4 mmHg (SBP: 150 ± 14 vs. 143 ± 16 mmHg, P = 0.005; DBP: 82 ± 10 vs. 78 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.009). Number of prescribed antihypertensive medication [6.0 (5.0-6.0) vs. 5.5 (5.0-6.0), P = 0.013] and adherence rate (95.2 ± 7.6 vs. 91.7 ± 13.9%, P = 0.065) was slightly reduced 6 months after RDN, both likely to underestimate the true BP reduction., Conclusion: Thus, our data indicate that even after given full respect to drug adherence as potential confounder of BP response after RDN, both office and 24-h ABPM were substantially reduced in patients with moderate TRH.

Objectives: Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce sympathetic activity and blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. The effects on resting and ambulatory heart rate (HR), also regulated by the sympathetic nervous system, are not established., Methods: Herein, we report 12-month outcomes from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry on office and ambulatory HR and BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (n = 846)., Results: HR declined in correlation with the HR at baseline and at 12 months, in particular, in patients in the upper tertile of HR (>74 bpm). BP reduction was similar in the tertiles of HR at baseline. Similar effects were observed when 24-h ambulatory HR and SBP were determined. Office HR was similarly decreased when patients were on a β-blocker or not. Antihypertensive treatment remained unchanged during the 12-month period of the Global SYMPLICITY Registry., Conclusion: RDN reduces BP independent from HR. A HR reduction is dependent on baseline HR and unchanged by β-blocker treatment. The effects of RDN on SBP and HR are durable up to 1 year. HR reduction might be a target for RDN in patients with high HR at baseline, which needs to be scrutinized in prospective trials.