Search

Multiple lung cancers may be intrapulmonary metastases or multiple primaries. Management and prognosis of both entities are different and make the pathologist's role challenging. In fact, distinguishing both entities may be difficult especially when the tumors present the same microscopic subtype. The microscopic diagnoses of these tumors have been improved based on the 2015 WHO classification. The aim of the authors was to assess the diagnostic value of morphologic features in comparison to the gold standard test represented by molecular testing in the distinction between intrapulmonary metastases and multiple lung primaries. To retrieve all eligible articles, PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched from 1999 to 2020 with limitation to French andEnglish language. The Meta-Disc software 5.1.32 was used to conduct this meta-analysis. The pSEN, pSPE, NLR, PLR, and DOR with the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The area under the SROC was calculated based on the SEN and SPE of each study. Q test and I

The positive diagnosis of MPM is based on morphologic features coupled with immunohistochemical findings. Many antibodies have been published especially in order to differentiate between malignant tumors and atypical mesothelial hyperplasia. BAP-1 is a BRCA1-binding protein whose loss of expression was frequently reported in MPM. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of this antibody in comparison to the most sensitive diagnostic antibody represented by the calretinin antibody.We performed a meta-analysis using the Meta-Disc software 5.1.32.According to our inclusion criteria, 19 studies with 11 studies dealing with BAP1 antibody and 8 studies dealing with calretinin antibody were included. The SEN of BAP 1 and calretinin antibodies was respectively estimated to 54.6% and 86.5%. The SPE reached respectively 95.7% and 76.6%. The dOR was estimated respectively to 23.664 and 38.8. The I-square revealed a heterogeneity of the parameters studied. The metaregression analysis revealed as covariates the amplification system and the histologic subtype as causing effects of heterogeneity for BAP1 antibodies and histologic subtype and chromogene as causing effects of heterogeneity for calretinin antibody.This meta-analysis revealed that BAP1 antibody should be associated with more sensitive antibodies in order to assess the diagnosis.

malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with a challenging diagnosis. Even if, clinical data are mandatory to suspect the diagnosis, the positive diagnosis is based on microscopic features. Morphologic features are still the port of call of the diagnosis but their non specific character and the multiplicity of differential diagnoses made the immunohistochemical markers mandatory for the diagnosis. Many antibodies with a positive diagnostic value including claretinin, mesothelin, WT1 and antibodies with a negative diagnostic value including TTF1, EMA, CD15 are recommended by the scientific societies. This is due to the diagnostic limits of every antibody which necessitate the association of multiple antibodies. In the diagnostic demarch, pathologists deal with different antibodies and clones. Even if many recommendations are available, every pathology lab has to experiment its own antibodies in order to optimize the routine diagnostic demarch especially in low-income country. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of different antibodies available in our lab and to recommend a decisional flowchart.we conducted a retrospective study about 30 MPM diagnosed over a 20-year-period. The different techniques were realized manually. The different antibodies used were anti-calretinin, anti-Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), anti-mesothelin, anti-Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 (TTF1), anti-ACE, anti-cytokeratin, anti-vimentin, anti-CD15, anti-cytokeratin 5/6, anti-bcl2, and anti-CD99 and anti-CD34 antibodies. The sensitivity and specificity of these antibodies were assessed.the microscopic exam concluded to an epithelioid mesothelioma (EM) in 17 cases, sarcomatoid mesothelioma (SM) in four cases and biphasic mesothelioma (BM) in nine cases. The immunohistochemical study was performed in all cases. A mean of eight antibodies was used in every case, average 4 to 20 antibodies. The immunohistochemical study was repeated from 2 to 5 times in 15 cases and concerned a mean of 3 antibodies per case. In EM and BM, the antibodies with positive predictive value and highest sensitivity were calretinin, EMA, cytokeratin, and vimentin reaching respectively a sensitivity of 86.2%, 89.7%, 92.9% and 89.3%. The most valuable antibodies with negative predictive value were TTF1, CD15 and ACE that presented a specificity reaching respectively 100%. In sarcomatoid mesothelima, the most sensitive antibody was the cytokeratin antibody.these results yielded to a diagnostic flowchart that we can use in routine practice and that is in accordance with the literature findings. Many diagnostic and technical pitfalls have to be known by pathologists when dealing with MPM.

Multidisciplinary concertation is mandatory in order to assess interstitial pneumonias. The study of the bronchoalveolar lavage helps evoking a diagnosis according to the lavage profile. In lymphocytic alveolitis, immunocytochemistry, or in flux cytometry are necessary in order to identify the different clusters of lymphocytes implicated. Our objective was to evaluate the profile of 31 lymphocytic alveolitis using 2 different techniques which are the immunocytochemistry and the in flow cytometry in order to evaluate the efficacy of each technique and to compare the different results to the final diagnoses. We describe a retrospective study about 31 patients admitted to our hospital in order to explore an interstitial pneumonia between January and July 2014. Bronchial endoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed in all cases. The sensitivity of the in flow cytometry was estimated to 53% and its specificity reached 33%. On the other hand, the immunocytochemistry presented a specificity of 42.8% and a sensitivity of 42.8%. The final diagnoses retained consisted in sarcoidosis in 12 cases, infectious pneumonia in 10 cases, hypersensitivity pneumonia in 3 cases, cryptogenic pneumonia in 3 cases, idiopathic fibrosis in 2 cases, and adenocarcinoma in 1 case. The relevance of both techniques depends on many factors. They necessitate an available material, well-trained technicians, and experimented pathologists.

In 2010, the World Health Organization published a new classification of the endocrine tumors based on the mitotic rate and index. Concerning lung endocrine tumors, the classification of 2004 remains acceptable and widely approved. We noticed in many publications that the most used antibodies in these tumors are chromogranin and synaptophysin. This finding let us wonder about the diagnostic utility of the CD56 antibody which is widely used in our department.Sixty-nine endocrine lung cancers were diagnosed over a 12-month period in our Department of Pathology. Immunohistochemical technique using the three antibodies: chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 was performed. The sensitivity of the three antibodies was performed using the ratio: true negative cases/true negative cases + false positive cases. The specificity wasn't performed because the antibodies were used only in endocrine tumors. The comparison of the different percentages of expression of the three antibodies was made by the SPSS software 22.0.The sensitivity of the chromogranin, synpatophysin, and CD56 accounted for 69%, 77%, and 98%, respectively. The mean percentage of immunoreactive cells with CD56 was 70% towards 15% and 20% with chromogranin and synaptophysin antibodies, respectively. The comparison of the percentages of expression showed a significant statistical difference between the expression of CD56 versus synaptophysin and CD56 versus chromogranin with P0.001.CD56 antibody seems to be of diagnostic value in endocrine lung tumors with the highest sensitivity. This fact highlights the necessity of using it as a first-line neuroendocrine marker in association to chromogranin which is considered as the most specific endocrine antibody.

Despite the new available histologic classification of lung cancers, it remains difficult to assess the real prognostic relevance of the different subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas. Facing the prognostic relevance of microvessel density (MVD) and the expression of metalloproteases and thyroid tyrosine factor 1 (TTF1) in different cancers, we tried to compare these parameters in the different subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas. We conducted a retrospective study of 46 adenocarcinomas surgically resected. An immunohistochemical study using the cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34), TTF1, metalloproteases 2 (MMP2), and metalloproteases 9 (MMP9) antibodies was performed on all samples while MVD was evaluated using CD34 antibody. The analyzed cases included 19 acinar, 7 papillary, 1 lepidic, and 19 solid predominant American Thoracic Classification of lung adenocarcinomas (ASK). The higher MVD levels were observed in papillary and acinar subtypes types and a statically significant difference in the MVD was observed in the different subtypes (p0,001). This study didn't show significant statistical results concerning MMP and TTF1 expression but it revealed a tendency to an equal expression of these antibodies in the different subtypes. The difference in the MVD between the different subtypes of adenocarcinoma puts emphasis on their prognostic relevance.

The accurate diagnosis of lung carcinoma has become compulsory especially after the introduction of new target therapies. Most of the patients are non operable. This fact points out the diagnostic importance of the cytology specimen. Our target was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of bronchial smears and cell blocks by comparing their results with those of the final diagnoses made on biopsies. We conducted a prospective study of 55 bronchial aspirates. It showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% when coupling both techniques. These results put emphasis on the diagnostic efficacy of both bronchial smears and cell blocks in diagnosing bronchial carcinoma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a challenging diagnosis characterized by the absence of real specific diagnostic markers. Positivity with the galectin-3 antibody was assessed by a cytoplasmic expression in 17 MPM. Fourteen cases expressed the galectin-3 antibody. The three negative cases consisted of epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid MPM. The 14 positive cases consisted of epithelioid MPM in 12 cases, sarcomatoid MPM in one case, and biphasic MPM in one case. In spite of our inability to prove the real diagnostic value of the galectin-3 antibody, our findings make us wonder about the implication of this antibody in the carcinogenesis of MPM.