Search

The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is used for the in vitro detection of a drug sensitization in assumed drug allergic patients. It is based on the detection of antigen (drug)-specific activation of T cells indicated by e.g. proliferation or cytokine secretion. However, occasional stimulatory effects of the drug unrelated to specific drug-allergic mechanisms can only be detected if a larger number of non-drug allergic control persons are tested with this specific drug. In this respect, the overall specificity of the LTT with ELISA read-out is summarized in several review articles, but the impact of a specific drug on the specificity has not yet been analyzed in a larger set of control persons. Do amoxicillin, cefuroxime and clindamycin induce an interferon (IFN)-y or interleukin (IL)-5 secretion of PBMC from control persons using the LTT with ELISA read-out? We performed LTTs with amoxicillin, cefuroxime and clindamycin and determined drug-specific IFN-γ and IL-5 secretion measured by ELISA read-out. We included PBMC from 60 non-drug allergic control persons, who were unexposed to the tested drug at the time of blood donation. PBMC from 12 out of 23 control persons tested with amoxicillin gave a positive stimulation index (SI > 3.0) for IFN-γ resulting in a specificity of 47.8%. The corresponding specificity was 75% for cefuroxime (5/20 if SI > 3.0) and 58.8% for clindamycin (7/17, if SI > 2.0), respectively. In a next step, we calculated the Δ IFN-γ concentration by subtracting the background IFN-γ concentration in the unstimulated sample from the stimulated sample. After stimulation with amoxicillin, a mean concentration of 21.0 pg/mL IFN-γ was secreted. The less outlier prone median concentration was 7.4 pg/mL and much higher than for cefuroxime (1.7 pg/mL) and clindamycin (1.0 pg/mL). Remarkably, IL-5 concentrations were below the detection limit (< 1 pg/mL) for all drugs in all control persons who responded to TT. Consideration of these observations may be helpful since a positive LTT result in a control patient may challenge the validity of a positive LTT result in the same experiment for a patient with assumed drug allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) occur in certain people and are often not predictable. DHRs can be classified as immediate and delayed reactions regarding to onset of clinical manifestations. Both reactions are considered to be an important public health problem because they can lead to life-threatening conditions; however, this review article will focus on delayed DHRs. The most important points for diagnosis of delayed DHRs are the recognition of drug hypersensitivity characteristics and culprit drug identification. While it is usually difficult to identify a culprit drug; clinical evaluation using the causality assessment method, a non-invasive process, can identify the culprit drug without the need for intensive investigation. Delayed DHRs can cause life-threatening conditions; therefore, in vivo skin tests, as well as drug provocation tests, have to be cautiously performed by a drug allergist and have not been recommended in uncontrolled conditions. ENDA/EAACI has recommended that in vitro tests (if available) be performed prior to any in vivo tests. Therefore, in vitro diagnostic tests can be alternative methods to identify a culprit drug for delayed DHR diagnosis as there is no or very low risk for patients under investigation. There are many testing approaches to identify causative agents for delayed DHRs such as: the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), cytokine/mediator detection assays (i.e. ELISA and flow cytometry-based bead assays), multiplex bead-based immunoassay and ELISpot. The LTT is the most standardized method whereas it has been available in medical schools affiliated with university hospitals. Other in vitro tests, like cytokine detection assays, have also been used, even though they are still being evaluated. They could supplement LTT results that would provide drug allergist's with documentary evidence and prevent risk to patients by avoiding in vivo or drug provocation testing. Hence, the in vitro tests have been promising tests contributing to the management of the delayed DHR work-up process in clinical practice. • In vitro tests could be very useful for identifying the causative drug in delayed DHRs because they do not require the well-characterized patient to be re-exposed to the suspicious drug. • Even LTT has so far been the best standardized method due to its excellent specificity; however, its sensitivity is not satisfactory to cover all DHR manifestations. • In order to increase the overall sensitivity, LTT could be supplemented with currently available in vitro cytokine detection assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions encompass a variety of different clinical phenotypes ranging from harmless rashes to fatal reactions. They can be classified into allergic (i.e. drug allergy) and non-allergic reactions (i.e. non-allergic hypersensitivity). Drug allergies in turn can either be antibody (e.g. IgE) or T cell-mediated. One of the diagnostic tools for the in vitro detection of drug allergy is the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) which is based on the activation and expansion of the drug-specific memory T cells following co-incubation of the patient's peripheral mononuclear cells (PMBC) with the suspected drug in vitro. The read-out parameter in the classical LTT is T cell proliferation which can be measured as counts per minute following the addition of radiolabeled thymidine to the cell culture. However, in the course of time different modifications of the classical LTT with regard to the read-out parameters and methods have been proposed. Likewise, variations of the LTT platform itself have been described in the literature. This review article describes the development of the classical LTT and its use in the context of drug allergy detection and summarizes the modifications which have been published over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphocyte transformation test, Dug hypersensitivity, Drug allergy Editorial - Special Issue on in vitro detection of drug allergy. [Extracted from the article]

Drug allergies pose a great deal of danger for the patients. It hinders effective treatment procedures in hospitalized patients. Moreover, it complicates the symptoms due to the allergic reactions of the immune system. Allergic reactions may arise against any medication including antibiotics and chemotherapeutics. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the sensitization pattern of the patients to culprit drug(s) before retreatment with the same or similar drug, or in order to confirm/exclude a suspected drug hypersensitivity reaction. In vivo and in vitro tests are performed in the evaluation of patients. Current methods of in vitro drug allergy evaluations rely on time consuming and expensive methods. Ficoll separation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, their activation with stimulants in the presence of the drug of interest, CD69 or CD25 or BrdU or radioactive thymidine analysis of the cells after a couple of days of incubation is an excessively elaborate work and also uneconomical. Moreover, it requires a great deal of expertise to interpret the results. Here, we are reporting a new whole blood based lymphocyte transformation test method that does not require ficoll separation, CD69, CD25, BrdU and radioactive thymidine analysis. Thanks to the color change in the whole blood itself one can easily determine the allergic reaction to a certain drug. This new method is less time consuming, more economical and easy to apply. • Current drug allergy tests are time consuming and expensive. • A new whole blood based test method is reported. • This method does not require ficoll separation. • It also does not require CD69, CD25, BrdU and radioactive analysis. • This new method is less time consuming, more economical and easy to apply. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]