Search

Wilms tumor gene (WT1) protein is an attractive target for cancer immunotherapy. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a combination therapy consisting of gemcitabine and WT1 peptide-based vaccine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and to make initial assessments of its clinical efficacy and immunologic response. Thirty-two HLA-A*24:02 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Patients received HLA-A*24:02-restricted, modified 9-mer WT1 peptide (3 mg/body) emulsified with Montanide ISA51 adjuvant (WT1 vaccine) intradermally biweekly and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. This combination therapy was well tolerated. The frequencies of grade 3-4 adverse events for this combination therapy were similar to those for gemcitabine alone. Objective response rate was 20.0% (6/30 evaluable patients). Median survival time and 1-year survival rate were 8.1 months and 29%, respectively. The association between longer survival and positive delayed-type hypersensitivity to WT1 peptide was statistically significant, and longer survivors featured a higher frequency of memory-phenotype WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes both before and after treatment. WT1 vaccine in combination with gemcitabine was well tolerated for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Delayed-type hypersensitivity-positivity to WT1 peptide and a higher frequency of memory-phenotype WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes could be useful prognostic markers for survival in the combination therapy with gemcitabine and WT1 vaccine. Further clinical investigation is warranted to determine the effectiveness of this combination therapy.

We conducted a clinical trial of an NY-ESO-1 cancer vaccine using 4 synthetic overlapping long peptides (OLP; peptides #1, 79-108; #2, 100-129; #3, 121-150; and #4, 142-173) that include a highly immunogenic region of the NY-ESO-1 molecule. Nine patients were immunized with 0.25 mg each of three 30-mer and a 32-mer long NY-ESO-1 OLP mixed with 0.2 KE Picibanil OK-432 and 1.25 mL Montanide ISA-51. The primary endpoints of this study were safety and NY-ESO-1 immune responses. Five to 18 injections of the NY-ESO-1 OLP vaccine were well tolerated. Vaccine-related adverse events observed were fever and injection site reaction (grade 1 and 2). Two patients showed stable disease after vaccination. An NY-ESO-1-specific humoral immune response was observed in all patients and an antibody against peptide #3 (121-150) was detected firstly and strongly after vaccination. NY-ESO-1 CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses were elicited in these patients and their epitopes were identified. Using a multifunctional cytokine assay, the number of single or double cytokine-producing cells was increased in NY-ESO-1-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells after vaccination. Multiple cytokine-producing cells were observed in PD-1 (-) and PD-1 (+) CD4 T cells. In conclusion, our study indicated that the NY-ESO-1 OLP vaccine mixed with Picibanil OK-432 and Montanide ISA-51 was well tolerated and elicited NY-ESO-1-specific humoral and CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in immunized patients.

KIF20A (RAB6KIFL) belongs to the kinesin superfamily of motor proteins, which play critical roles in the trafficking of molecules and organelles during the growth of pancreatic cancer. Immunotherapy using a previously identified epitope peptide for KIF20A is expected to improve clinical outcomes. A phase I clinical trial combining KIF20A-derived peptide with gemcitabine (GEM) was therefore conducted among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received prior therapy such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. GEM was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. The KIF20A-derived peptide was injected subcutaneously on a weekly basis in a dose-escalation manner (doses of 0.5, 1, and 3 mg/body; 3 patients/cohort). Safety and immunologic parameters were assessed. No severe adverse effects of grade 3 or higher related to KIF20A-derived peptide were observed. Of the 9 patients who completed at least one course of treatment, interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing cells were induced in 4 of 9 patients (P2, P3, P6, and P7), and IFN-γ-producing cells were increased in 4 of the 9 patients (P1, P5, P8, and P9). Four of the 9 patients achieved stable disease. The disease control rate was 44%. The median survival time after first vaccination was 173 days and 1-year survival rate was 11.1%. IFN-γ-producing cells were induced by the KIF20A-derived peptide vaccine at a high rate, even in combination with GEM. These results suggest that this combination therapy will be feasible and promising for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

The effectivenes of cancer vaccines in inducing CD8(+) T-cell responses remains a challenge, resulting in a need for testing more potent adjuvants. Our objective was to determine the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination against melanoma-related antigens employing MART-1, gp100, and tysosinase paptides combined with the TLR9 agonist PF-3512676 and local granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor in oil emulsion. Using continuous monitoring of safety and a 2-stage design for immunologic efficacy, 20 immune response evaluable patients were targetted. Vaccinations were given subcutaneously on days 1 and 15 per cycle (1cycle=28 d) for up to 13 cycles. Interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot was used as the primary assay measuring the frequency of peripheral antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells at days 50 and 90 compared with baseline (target ≥ 9/20 immunologic responses). Clinical responses were measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors every 8 weeks. Twenty-two (including 20 immune response evaluable) melanoma patients were enrolled. All had American Joint Committe on Cancer stage IV (5M1a, 6M1b, 11M1c) and most had previously received therapy. Eight had previously treated brain metastases. An average of 3.5 cycles of vaccination per patient was administered. Clinical response data were available for 21 patients. There were 2 partial response and 8 stable disease lasting 2-7 months. One patient with ongoing partial response continued on treatment. At a median follow-up of 7.39 months (range, 3.22-20.47 mo), median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (90% confidence interval, 1.84-3.68) and median overall survival was 13.4 months (90% confidence interval,11.3-∞). No regimen-related grade 3/4/5 toxicities were observed. There were 9/20 patients with positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot at day 50 and/or day 90. Our adjuvant regimen combining PF-3512676 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor was safe and is worthy of further testing with these or alternative peptides, potentially in combination with antibodies that target immunoregulatory checkpoints.

An open-labeled, dose-escalation phase 1 trial of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) vaccine and gemcitabine (GEM) combination therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or biliary tract cancer was performed. The primary end point was evaluation of toxicity, safety, and optimal immunologic dose of vaccine. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A 0201, HLA-A 0206, and/or HLA-A 2402-positive patients with inoperable advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer who had not previously been treated with GEM were eligible for this study. Six doses of GEM and 4 doses of WT1 peptide (1 or 3 mg) emulsified in Montanide adjuvant were administered over 2 months. Twenty-five patients (13 male and 12 female) were enrolled. Nine patients had inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer, 8 had gallbladder cancer, 4 had intrahepatic, and 4 had extrahepatic bile duct cancer. The adverse events were comparable to those with GEM alone. Delayed-type hypersensitivity test was positive after vaccination in 2 patients, and WT1-specific T cells in peptide-stimulated culture were detected by tetramer assay in 59% (13 of 22) of patients. The disease control rate at 2 months was 89% for pancreatic cancer and 50% for biliary tract cancer. With a median follow-up time of 259 days, the median survival time for biliary tract cancer was 288 days, and that for pancreatic cancer was 259 days. Although objective clinical efficacy was not apparent, the safety of WT1 vaccine and GEM combination therapy was confirmed in this study.

Nine participants with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma, who were human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1, HLA-A2, or HLA-A3, were eligible to enroll in a phase 1 study designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a peptide-based vaccine. Participants received 5 class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted synthetic peptides derived from multiple ovarian cancer-associated proteins plus a class II major histocompatibility complex-restricted synthetic helper peptide derived from tetanus toxoid protein. The vaccines were administered with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor in Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant over a 7-week period. All vaccine-related toxicities were grade 1 to 2, the most common being injection site reaction (grade 2, 100%), fatigue (grade 1, 78%), and headache (grade 1, 67%). Lymphocytes from the peripheral blood and a node draining a secondary vaccine site (sentinel immunized node) were harvested during the course of vaccination and T-cell responses to the peptides were evaluated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. CD8 T-cell responses were detected in 1 participant ex vivo and in 8 of 9 participants (89%) after in vitro stimulation. All 4 HLA-A2 and HLA-A3-restricted peptides were immunogenic. This includes 2 peptides, folate binding protein (FBP191-199) and Her-2/neu754-762, which had not previously been evaluated in vaccines in humans. Responding T cells required over 200 nM for half-maximal reactivity. These data support continued investigation of these peptides as immunogens for patients with ovarian cancer but, owing to low potency, also suggest a need for additional immunomodulation in combination with vaccines to increase the magnitude and to improve the quality of the T-cell responses.

In this phase 2 study, the authors assessed the hematologic and clinical toxicities of a melanoma peptide vaccine administered in conjunction with low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy. Forty patients were randomized to receive a weekly vaccine paired with a regimen of subcutaneous IL-2 (3 x 10(6) IU/m2/day) administered daily for 6 weeks beginning either at week 1 or at week 4 of vaccine therapy. The differences in the time course of the IL-2 between the two groups permitted assessment of the cause of the toxicities, due either to IL-2 or to vaccine components. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated in the outpatient setting. Toxicities attributable to the vaccine components were principally limited to grade 1 injection site reactions. Systemic clinical toxicities correlated with the initiation of IL-2 therapy. These toxicities coincided temporally and in magnitude with changes in circulating eosinophil counts, suggesting that systemic clinical toxicities and eosinophilia may have common etiologic pathways. Other minor toxicities attributable to this low-dose IL-2 regimen were clinically insignificant hepatic toxicity, mild anemia, and mild thrombocytosis. The hematologic effects of this therapy were delayed in time between the two treatment groups, without dramatic differences in magnitude, which suggests minimal modulation of the IL-2 toxicity by components of the vaccine., (Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)