Search

Background: Cardioneuroablation has been emerging as a potential treatment alternative in appropriately selected patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS) and functional AV block (AVB). However the majority of available evidence has been derived from retrospective cohort studies performed by experienced operators., Methods: The Cardioneuroablation for the Management of Patients with Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope and Symptomatic Bradyarrhythmias (CNA-FWRD) Registry is a multicenter prospective registry with cross-over design evaluating acute and long-term outcomes of VVS and AVB patients treated by conservative therapy and CNA., Results: The study is a prospective observational registry with cross-over design for analysis of outcomes between a control group (i.e., behavioral and medical therapy only) and intervention group (Cardioneuroablation). Primary and secondary outcomes will only be assessed after enrollment in the registry. The follow-up period will be 3 years after enrollment., Conclusions: There remains a lack of prospective multicentered data for long-term outcomes comparing conservative therapy to radiofrequency CNA procedures particularly for key outcomes including recurrence of syncope, AV block, durable impact of disruption of the autonomic nervous system, and long-term complications after CNA. The CNA-FWRD registry has the potential to help fill this information gap., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation of mid- or epicardial substrate is difficult and requires a creative approach in patients with a history of coronary bypass that precludes percutaneous epicardial catheter manipulation. The coronary venous system (CVS) provides limited access to the epicardial surface of the heart. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of epicardial mapping and ablation of VT substrates from the CVS in patients with history of coronary bypass., Methods: Patients undergoing VT ablation at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Those who had basal to mid ventricular substrate based on computed tomography imaging and history of coronary bypass were included. Endocardial and CVS mapping and ablation was performed in standard fashion using 3D electroanatomic mapping. The primary endpoint was defined as VT circuit elimination, termination, non-inducibility, or perturbation of the circuit., Results: Of 192 consecutive VT ablations from 2017 to 2020, 35 (18%) had a history of coronary bypass and basal to the mid-ventricular substrate by imaging. There were no significant characteristic differences between the endocardial only (n = 19) vs endocardial + CVS (n = 16) groups. In 14 (88%) of patients undergoing CVS mapping, the VT circuit was identified to be within access from the epicardial surface. Ablation was attempted in 8 (57%) of these patients, and the primary endpoint was reached in 88% of those undergoing CVS ablation. There were no complications related to CVS ablation., Conclusion: Mapping and ablation of mid- or epicardial VT circuits from the CVS branches are feasible and safe and may be helpful in the treatment of VT in patients who are otherwise not candidates for percutaneous epicardial ablation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)