Search

Objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in midterm. Background. There are few data about midterm clinical outcomes of BP-EES compared with DP-EES. Methods and Results. Between January 2016 and December 2017, 395 consecutive patients were treated with BP-EES and 391 consecutive patients were treated with DP-EES in Nagoya Heart Center. The primary endpoint was a 3-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinical indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, clinical indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite stent thrombosis (ST) were also evaluated as the secondary endpoints. After propensity score matching, 327 patients were selected in each group. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of TLF was 4.5% in the BP-EES group versus 6.5% in DP-EES (adjusted HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.33–1.30), log-rank P=0.23). Regarding the individual components of the TLF at 3 years, the cumulative incidence of target vessel MI was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.9%: adjusted HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.71–0.97), log-rank P=0.01), but there was no difference between BP-EES and DP-EES in the incidence of cardiac death and clinically indicated TLR. The cumulative 3-year incidence of definite ST was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.6%, log-rank P=0.02). Conclusions. There were no significant differences of TLF between BP-EES and DP-EES within 3 years. In this study, BP-EES seems to prevent definite ST and be safer than DP-EES in midterm.

Background Peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) and very late stent thrombosis. However, the risk factors and clinical sequelae of PSS after second-generation DES implantation remain unclear. Methods and Results This study comprised 2,090 patients with 2,883 lesions treated with second-generation DES from April 2009 to February 2013. Angiographic findings and clinical outcomes were compared between PSS and non-PSS groups. Follow-up angiography was available for 2,411 lesions. PSS was observed in 23 lesions: 4 in biolimus-eluting stents, 4 in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), and 15 in everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Right coronary artery lesions, chronic total occlusion (CTO), and lesions with severe angulation (>90°) were more frequent in the PSS group compared with the non-PSS group. Lesions were longer and the cumulative TLR incidence at 3 years was higher in the PSS group than those in the non-PSS group (27.9 mm vs. 19.4 mm, P

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess clinical benefit of the Echo-guided ProGlide technique in patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI). BACKGROUND The efficacy of the Echo-guided ProGlide technique during percutaneous TF-TAVI was not previously clarified. METHODS A total of 121 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TF-TAVI at our institution between February 2014 and July 2017 were enrolled in this study. According to the introduction of this novel technique in March 2016, patients were divided into two groups (echo-guided group who underwent TAVI from March 2016 to July 2017, n = 63; not echo-guided group who underwent TAVI from February 2014 to February 2016, n = 58). The incidence of major vascular complications, defined per the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, and ProGlide complications including acute femoral artery stenosis or occlusion and bleeding requiring any intervention. RESULTS The incidence of major vascular complication and ProGlide complication were significantly lower in the echo-guided group than in not echo-guided group (1.6% vs 17.2%, P

Peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) and very late stent thrombosis. However, the risk factors and clinical sequelae of PSS after second-generation DES implantation remain unclear.This study comprised 2,090 patients with 2,883 lesions treated with second-generation DES from April 2009 to February 2013. Angiographic findings and clinical outcomes were compared between PSS and non-PSS groups. Follow-up angiography was available for 2,411 lesions. PSS was observed in 23 lesions: 4 in biolimus-eluting stents, 4 in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), and 15 in everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Right coronary artery lesions, chronic total occlusion (CTO), and lesions with severe angulation (90°) were more frequent in the PSS group compared with the non-PSS group. Lesions were longer and the cumulative TLR incidence at 3 years was higher in the PSS group than those in the non-PSS group (27.9 mm vs. 19.4 mm, P 0.0001; 27.4% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in stent thrombosis between the two groups. Multivariable analysis identified CTO [odds ratio (OR) 3.75, 95%CI 1.52-8.88, P = 0.005] as an independent predictor of PSS.PSS after second-generation DES implantation was associated with an increased risk of subsequent TLR. CTO was the independent predictor of PSS.