1. Efficacy of Combining Proximal Balloon Guiding Catheter and Distal Access Catheter in Thrombectomy with Stent Retriever for Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke
- Author
-
Jae Kwan Cha, Dae-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyung Choi, Sang Hwa Kim, Sang Hyun Kim, Hyun-Seok Park, Hyun Wook Nah, Jae Taeck Huh, and Myung Jin Kang
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Balloon ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Brain ischemia ,0302 clinical medicine ,Modified Rankin Scale ,Occlusion ,medicine ,Thrombus ,Thrombectomy ,Clinical Article ,business.industry ,Cerebral infarction ,General Neuroscience ,Thrombolysis ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Stroke ,Catheter ,Guiding catheter ,Stents ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated efficacy of combining proximal balloon guiding catheter (antegrade flow arrest) and distal access catheter (aspiration at the site of occlusion) in thrombectomy for anterior circulation ischemic stroke. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever. The patients were divided by the techniques adopted, the combined technique (proximal balloon guiding catheter and large bore distal access catheter) group (n=57, 49.1%) and the conventional (guiding catheter with stent retriever) technique group (n=59, 50.9%). We evaluated baseline characteristics (epidemiologic data, clinical and imaging characteristics) and procedure details (the number of retrieval attempts, procedure time), as well as angiographic (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, distal thrombus migration) and clinical outcome (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 3 months) of them. RESULTS The number of retrieval attempts was lower (p=0.002) and the first-pass successful reperfusion rate was higher (56.1% vs. 28.8%; p=0.003) in the combined technique group. And the rate of final result of TICI score 3 was higher (68.4% vs. 28.8%; p
- Published
- 2019