1. Apparent diffusion coefficient is highly reproducible on preclinical imaging systems: Evidence from a seven-center multivendor study
- Author
-
Sabrina, Doblas, Gilberto S, Almeida, François-Xavier, Blé, Philippe, Garteiser, Benjamin A, Hoff, Dominick J O, McIntyre, Lydia, Wachsmuth, Thomas L, Chenevert, Cornelius, Faber, John R, Griffiths, Andreas H, Jacobs, David M, Morris, James P B, O'Connor, Simon P, Robinson, Bernard E, Van Beers, and John C, Waterton
- Subjects
Equipment Failure Analysis ,Europe ,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Phantoms, Imaging ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Equipment Design ,Image Enhancement ,United States ,Article - Abstract
To evaluate between-site agreement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems.A miniaturized thermally stable ice-water phantom was devised. ADC (mean and interquartile range) was measured over several days, on 4.7T, 7T, and 9.4T Bruker, Agilent, and Magnex small-animal MRI systems using a common protocol across seven sites. Day-to-day repeatability was expressed as percent variation of mean ADC between acquisitions. Cross-site reproducibility was expressed as 1.96 × standard deviation of percent deviation of ADC values.ADC measurements were equivalent across all seven sites with a cross-site ADC reproducibility of 6.3%. Mean day-to-day repeatability of ADC measurements was 2.3%, and no site was identified as presenting different measurements than others (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P = 0.02, post-hoc test n.s.). Between-slice ADC variability was negligible and similar between sites (P = 0.15). Mean within-region-of-interest ADC variability was 5.5%, with one site presenting a significantly greater variation than the others (P = 0.0013).Absolute ADC values in preclinical studies are comparable between sites and equipment, provided standardized protocols are employed.
- Published
- 2015