Search

To assess the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with initiation of duloxetine therapy compared with other pharmacologic therapies for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).This study used administrative claims databases for commercially-insured individuals aged 18-64 years to examine factors associated with treatment among DPNP patients who initiated duloxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), venlafaxine, gabapentin, pregabalin, or opioids between 7/1/2005 and 12/31/2007. Treatment initiation was defined as no pill coverage of the same medication over the previous 90 days. Multiple logistic regression models were estimated to assess factors associated with initiating duloxetine versus each of the other DPNP therapies.The study included 11,060 DPNP patients with average age of 55 years old. Cardiovascular disease (63-70%), cerebrovascular/peripheral vascular disease (26-33%), low back pain (24-39%), and osteoarthritis (17-26%) were the most common diabetes- and pain-related comorbidities. Controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients who received duloxetine or pregabalin in the prior 12-month period were more likely to initiate duloxetine. Patients from other DPNP treatment cohorts, except for those in the pregabalin cohort, were more likely to re-initiate the same prior therapy than begin treatment with duloxetine (all p0.05). A history of anxiety disorder was significantly associated with initiation of all DPNP treatments other than duloxetine (all p0.05), except for TCAs. Patients with low back pain were more likely to initiate duloxetine than TCAs or venlafaxine, but less likely to initiate duloxetine than pregabalin or opioids. Patients with infections related to diabetes were less likely to initiate duloxetine than venlafaxine, gabapentin, or opioids.Because a retrospective administrative claims database was used, this study is subject to selection bias due to unobservable confounders, inability to measure prescriber preferences or characteristics or disease severity.Among commercially-insured DPNP patients, those with prior use of duloxetine or pregabalin were more likely to initiate duloxetine than other treatments. The presence of select comorbidities was also associated with specific medication initiation.

Publications containing recent, real-world data on the economic impact of hip fractures in the UK are lacking. This retrospective electronic medical records database analysis assessed medication and healthcare resource use, direct healthcare costs, and factors predicting increased resource use and costs in adult UK hip fracture patients.Data were obtained from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics for adult patients hospitalized for their first hip fracture between January 1, 2006 and March 31, 2011 (index event); healthcare costs were calculated from the National Health Service perspective using 2011-2012 cost data.Data from 8028 patients were analyzed. Resource use and costs were statistically significantly higher in the year following fracture (mean total [standard deviation (SD)] cost £7359 [£14,937]) compared with the year before fracture (mean total [SD] cost £3122 [£9435]; p 0.001), and were similar to the total amount of the index hospitalization (mean total [SD] cost £8330 [£2627]). Multivariate regression analysis (using an estimated generalized linear model) showed that older age, male gender, higher comorbidity, osteoporosis, discharge to another institution compared with home, and pre-index hospitalization and outpatient visits were associated with increased post-index hospitalization healthcare costs (all p 0.05).Although we did not capture all pre- and post-index costs and healthcare utilization, this study provides important insights regarding the characteristics of patients with hip fracture, and information that will be useful in burden-of-illness and economic analyses.

To assess factors associated with adherence to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).This study analyzed pharmacy benefit claims of naïve Adcirca and Revatio users between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010. Patients were considered adherent if their proportion of days covered (PDC) was ≥ 80% over a 6-month period. Logistic regressions were estimated to assess the factors associated with adherence. Analyses were stratified by use of a specialty pharmacy or retail pharmacy. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding individuals with 90-day supply.Of the total of 2143 patients included, 46.8% were adherent. Adherence was higher among 930 specialty pharmacy users (65.6%) than 1213 retail pharmacy users (32.3%, p 0.001). Adherence was higher among Adcirca users (60.7%; approved dose 40 mg once-daily) than Revatio users (44.3%, p 0.001; approved dose 20 mg thrice-daily). Among retail pharmacy users, adherence was higher in patients using Adcirca (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 1.60-4.22) and patients with an index prescription given by pulmonologists (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.15-2.50), while lower in patients with higher copayment ($51-$250: OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.90; $251+: OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.83). Among specialty pharmacy users, only high copayment ($251+: OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.90) was found to be a significant factor for non-adherence. After excluding individuals with 90-day supply, adherence rate was 29.6% in retail pharmacy and 57.9% in specialty pharmacy (p 0.001), and regression results were similar.Diagnosis of PAH was not confirmed without access to medical claims. Pharmacy refill records might not reflect actual consumption. Adherence evaluated for 6 months might not be generalizable to longer periods.Adherence to PDE5Is for PAH is sub-optimal. The findings suggest that adherence to PDE5Is in patients with PAH is associated with the use of specialty pharmacy, simpler dosing frequency, a lower financial barrier, and a prescription given by pulmonologists.

To assess the economic burden in direct healthcare utilization and costs for refractory epileptic patients with partial onset seizures (POS) and assess the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns among these patients.This retrospective database study analyzed administrative claims of commercially-insured patients with POS from 2004-2008. Healthcare costs and utilization were compared between refractory (defined as ≥3 AEDs) and non-refractory patients by calendar year and AED treatment patterns were described for refractory patients.Of the 79,149 patients identified (mean age 33 years; 54.8% female), 8714 (11%) were classified as refractory. In 2008, average annual healthcare costs for refractory patients were significantly higher than non-refractory patients ($33,613 vs $19,085), also by settings for inpatient ($11,780 vs $6076), outpatient ($13,431 vs $8637), and pharmacy costs ($8402 vs $4372) (all p 0.001). Among refractory patients, close to one-third of total costs were for POS-related services. Similar trends were observed when assessing POS-related utilization and costs. The differences were consistent across all calendar years examined. Among refractory patients, 80.5% were on monotherapy at the beginning of the follow-up period. Levetiracetam is the common AED in mono/combination therapy as well as add-on/switch-to.The onset of seizure cannot be identified, and the indication of each AED could not be confirmed from the pharmacy claims. Only direct medical costs were assessed.Pattern of use was very dynamic, suggesting seizures are not well-controlled. Improving seizure control and reducing economic burden of refractory epilepsy remain important unmet medical needs in this population.

Duloxetine is approved to treat diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in the US. The study objective was to examine the predictors of duloxetine compliance, and its association with healthcare costs among DPNP patients.The study used administrative claims databases to identify non-depressed DPNP patients with a duloxetine prescription dispensed between October 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006. Two cohorts of patients were constructed based on compliance to duloxetine therapy over 1-year follow-up with high compliance defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR)or =0.80. All-cause, diabetes-, and DPNP-related healthcare costs during 1-year follow-up were estimated. Logistic regressions were performed to examine how average daily dose (ADD) of duloxetine and other factors may influence compliance. Multivariate regressions were estimated to examine the association between compliance and healthcare costs.The study included 1,380 commercially insured (mean age 55 years) and 974 patients with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental insurance (mean age 75 years). In both populations, patients with an ADD30 mg were more likely to be compliant with the therapy compared with those with an ADD ofor =30 mg (odds ratio ranged 1.79-3.38, all p0.05). Controlling for differences in demographics, clinical and economic characteristics, commercially insured low duloxetine compliance patients had greater all-cause ($5,334, p0.05) and diabetes-related healthcare costs ($3,414, p0.05) than high-compliance patients, with the biggest difference from inpatient costs (all-cause: $7,508; diabetes-related: $3,785, all p0.05). Similar trends were found in the Medicare supplemental insured population; however, differences in all-cause healthcare costs were not significant.DPNP patients with a higher ADD of duloxetine over a 1-year follow-up period were more compliant with the therapy. Duloxetine patients with high compliance were also associated with lower healthcare costs. Due to the use of a retrospective cohort design on administrative claims database, limitations of this analysis include a lack of formal diagnostic testing of patients, and inability to infer causality or measure factors such as DPNP severity that are not captured in such database.