Search

Purpose: Convolutional neural network (CNN) methods have been proposed to quantify lesions in medical imaging. Commonly, more than one imaging examination is available for a patient, but the serial information in these images often remains unused. CNN-based methods have the potential to extract valuable information from previously acquired imaging to better quantify lesions on current imaging of the same patient. Approach: A pretrained CNN can be updated with a patient’s previously acquired imaging: patient-specific fine-tuning (FT). In this work, we studied the improvement in performance of lesion quantification methods on magnetic resonance images after FT compared to a pretrained base CNN. We applied the method to two different approaches: the detection of liver metastases and the segmentation of brain white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Results: The patient-specific fine-tuned CNN has a better performance than the base CNN. For the liver metastases, the median true positive rate increases from 0.67 to 0.85. For the WMH segmentation, the mean Dice similarity coefficient increases from 0.82 to 0.87. Conclusions: We showed that patient-specific FT has the potential to improve the lesion quantification performance of general CNNs by exploiting a patient’s previously acquired imaging.

Purpose: Hippocampus contouring for radiotherapy planning is performed on MR image data due to poor anatomical visibility on computed tomography (CT) data. Deep learning methods for direct CT hippocampus auto-segmentation exist, but use MR-based training contours. We investigate if these can be replaced by CT-based contours without loss in segmentation performance. This would remove the MR not only from inference but also from training. Approach: The hippocampus was contoured by medical experts on MR and CT data of 45 patients. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for hippocampus segmentation on CT were trained on CT-based or propagated MR-based contours. In both cases, their predictions were evaluated against the MR-based contours considered as the ground truth. Performance was measured using several metrics, including Dice score, surface distances, and contour Dice score. Bayesian dropout was used to estimate model uncertainty. Results: CNNs trained on propagated MR contours (median Dice 0.67) significantly outperform those trained on CT contours (0.59) and also experts contouring manually on CT (0.59). Differences between the latter two are not significant. Training on MR contours results in lower model uncertainty than training on CT contours. All contouring methods (manual or CNN) on CT perform significantly worse than a CNN segmenting the hippocampus directly on MR (median Dice 0.76). Additional data augmentation by rigid transformations improves the quantitative results but the difference remains significant. Conclusions: CT-based training contours for CT hippocampus segmentation cannot replace propagated MR-based contours without significant loss in performance. However, if MR-based contours are used, the resulting segmentations outperform experts in contouring the hippocampus on CT.