Search

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is frequently used in the management of brain metastases, but concerns over potential toxicity limit applications for larger lesions or those in eloquent areas. Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is often substituted for SRS in these cases. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of patients who received SRT at our institution. Seventy patients with brain metastases treated with SRT from 2006-2012 were analyzed. The rates of local and distant intracranial progression, overall survival, acute toxicity, and radionecrosis were determined. The SRT regimen was 25 Gy in 5 fractions among 87 % of patients. The most common tumor histologies were non-small cell lung cancer (37 %), breast cancer (20 %) and melanoma (20 %), and the median tumor diameter was 1.7 cm (range 0.4-6.4 cm). Median survival after SRT was 10.7 months. Median time to local progression was 17 months, with a local control rate of 68 % at 6 months and 56 % at 1 year. Acute toxicity was seen in 11 patients (16 %), mostly grade 1 or 2 with the most common symptom being mild headache. Symptomatic radiation-induced treatment change was seen on follow-up MRIs in three patients (4.3 %). SRT appears to be a safe and reasonably effective technique to treat brain metastases deemed less suitable for SRS, though dose intensification strategies may further improve local control.

To review the safety and efficacy of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brainstem metastases. We reviewed all patients with brain metastases treated with SRS at DF/BWCC from 2001 to 2009 to identify patients who had SRS to a single brainstem metastasis. Overall survival and freedom-from-local failure rates were calculated from the date of SRS using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 24 consecutive patients with brainstem metastases had SRS. At the time of SRS, 21/24 had metastatic lesions elsewhere within the brain. 23/24 had undergone prior WBRT. Primary diagnoses included eight NSCLC, eight breast cancer, three melanoma, three renal cell carcinoma and two others. Median dose was 13 Gy (range, 8-16). One patient had fractionated SRS 5 Gy ×5. Median target volume was 0.2 cc (range, 0.02-2.39). The median age was 57 years (range, 42-92). Follow-up information was available in 22/24 cases. At the time of analysis, 18/22 patients (82%) had died. The median overall survival time was 5.3 months (range, 0.8-21.1 months). The only prognostic factor that trended toward statistical significance for overall survival was the absence of synchronous brain metastasis at the time of SRS; 1-year overall survival was 31% with versus 67% without synchronous brain metastasis (log rank P = 0.11). Non-significant factors included primary tumor histology and status of extracranial disease (progressing vs. stable/absent). Local failure occurred in 4/22 cases (18%). Actuarial freedom from local failure for all cases was 78.6% at 1 year. RTOG grade 3 toxicities were recorded in two patients (ataxia, confusion). Linac-based SRS for small volume brainstem metastases using a median dose of 13 Gy is associated with acceptable local control and low morbidity.

To study the ability of dual phase FDG-PET/CT imaging to accurately distinguish tumor versus necrosis in patients treated for brain metastases. 32 (22 female, 10 male) consecutive patients with treated brain metastases, lesion size greater than 0.5 cm(3) and suspected recurrence on MRI underwent dual-phase FDG-PET/CT. Clinical outcome was assessed by biopsy or by MRI. SUVmax and SUVmean values of the lesion (L) and gray matter (GM) at the level of the thalamus were measured on early (1) and delayed (2) imaging. L1/GM1 and L2/GM2 and the change of L/GM ratios as a function of time were calculated [(L2/GM2 - L1/GM1)/(L1/GM1)]. Cut-off values were obtained by ROC analysis. P < 0.05 defined statistical significance. Seven patients were excluded due to indeterminate outcomes. 25 patients (16 female, 9 male; 27 lesions; 28 scan sessions) had clear outcomes, proven by either biopsy (n = 16 patients) or serial follow-up MRI (n = 9 patients). Primary subtypes included breast (n = 9), lung (n = 7), melanoma (n = 3), squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (n = 2) and other (n = 4). Twenty-two patients underwent prior radiation (2-113 months) and three received only prior chemotherapy (5 months to 3 years). A change >0.19 of L/GM ratios as a function of time was 95% sensitive, 100% specific, and 96.4% accurate (P = 0.0001; AUC = 0.97) for distinguishing tumor versus radiation necrosis. The ratio of the change of the lesion to WM ratios over time was the second best indicator of outcome when compared to all indices used (ROC cut-off = 0.25, sensitivity 89.5% and specificity 90.9%, and accuracy 89.2%; P = 0.0001; AUC = 0.95), Early or late SUVs of the lesion alone did not differentiate between tumor and necrosis. Regardless of histological type, differentiation of necrosis from metastatic brain lesions was improved by using the change of lesion to gray matter SUVmax ratios as a function of time.

The purpose of this case series is to report the unexpected occurrence of four cases of late radiation-induced neurotoxicity with bevacizumab use following radiotherapy to the CNS. We retrospectively reviewed the case records of four patients, three with glioblastoma and one with bone metastases secondary to metastatic breast cancer, who were treated with radiotherapy and developed late radiation-induced neurotoxicity following bevacizumab use. Three cases of optic neuropathy in glioblastoma patients and a single case of Brown-Séquard syndrome in the thoracic spine of a patient with metastatic breast cancer are reported. We hypothesize that bevacizumab use following radiotherapy to the CNS may inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent repair of normal neural tissue, and thus may increase the risk of late radiation neurotoxicity. Phase III data on the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab use with radiation in the setting of glioblastoma is awaited.