Search

Since frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques have been recently introduced, hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS) for large brain metastases (BMs) is gradually increasing. To verify the efficacy and safety of HF-SRS for large BMs, we aimed to perform a systematic review and compared them with SF-SRS. We systematically searched the studies regarding SF-SRS or HF-SRS for large (> 2 cm) BM from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on July 31, 2018. Biologically effective dose with the α/β ratio of 10 (BED10), 1-year local control (LC), and radiation necrosis (RN) were compared between the two groups, with the studies being weighted by the sample size. The 15 studies with 1049 BMs that described 1-year LC and RN were included. HF-SRS tended to be performed in larger tumors; however, higher mean BED10 (50.1 Gy10 versus 40.4 Gy10, p

Since frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques have been recently introduced, hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS) for large brain metastases (BMs) is gradually increasing. To verify the efficacy and safety of HF-SRS for large BMs, we aimed to perform a systematic review and compared them with SF-SRS.We systematically searched the studies regarding SF-SRS or HF-SRS for large ( 2 cm) BM from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on July 31, 2018. Biologically effective dose with the α/β ratio of 10 (BEDThe 15 studies with 1049 BMs that described 1-year LC and RN were included. HF-SRS tended to be performed in larger tumors; however, higher mean BEDHF-SRS results in better LC of large BMs while simultaneously reducing RN compared to SF-SRS. Thus, HF-SRS should be considered a priority for SF-SRS in patients with large BMs who are not suitable to undergo surgical resection.

The growth rate and natural history of untreated hemangioblastomas remain unclear. This study investigated the natural history of untreated intracranial hemangioblastomas and predictors of tumor growth using volumetric assessment. This study retrospectively enrolled 31 patients with untreated hemangioblastomas between 2004 and 2017 who were followed up for at least 12 months. The 31 patients had a total of 52 hemangioblastomas. The 31 patients included 11 (35.5%) men and 20 (64.5%) women, of mean age 42.5 years. Seventeen (54.8%) patients were genetically diagnosed with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. Of the 52 lesions, 33 (63.5%) grew during the follow-up period, whereas 19 (36.5%) remained stable. Overall mean actual growth rate (AGR) was 1.94 cm3/year, 2.38 cm3/year in the VHL and 1.79 cm3/year in the non-VHL group (p = 0.31). Overall mean relative growth rate (RGR) was 21%/year, 26%/year in the VHL and 19%/year in the non-VHL group. Time to 50% treatment probability was 34 months. The 1, 3, 5, and 7-year treatment probabilities were 11.5%, 50.1%, 52.7%, and 73%, respectively. The presence of only symptomatic lesions was significantly predictive of the growth of intracranial hemangioblastoma (odds ratio: 5.0, p = 0.02). The overall growth rate of intracranial hemangioblastoma was faster than that of other benign intracranial tumors, with symptomatic lesions being the only meaningful predictor of tumor growth. Because of their rapid growth rate and high probability of treatment, a wait and scan management strategy should be carefully applied to intracranial hemangioblastomas.

As per the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on the classification of central nervous system tumors, solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) constitute a single disease entity, known as SFT/HPC. This study provides a clinical analysis of these tumors and describes the treatment outcomes of SFT/HPCs. This retrospective study included 76 patients with histopathologically proven SFT/HPC. Reclassification according to the 2016 WHO guideline was done for patients who were diagnosed with SFT or HPC based on the 2007 WHO classification. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for all patients and subgroups. The median follow-up period was 77.9 months. The median RFS and OS were 126.5 and 136.8 months, respectively. The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year RFS rates were 93%, 72%, 40%, and 40%, respectively. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year OS rates were 97%, 89%, 54%, and 35%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS; p = 0.009, hazard ratio [HR] 6.986), female sex (p = 0.023, HR 1.76), and age over 45 (p = 0.037, HR 2.74) were associated with shorter RFS. Patients who underwent SRS as initial treatment had a shorter OS than that of patients who underwent primary resection (p

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective and safe for treating intracranial meningiomas, concerns have been raised about the use of SRS for large-sized tumors involving the skull base that frequently encroach onto adjacent critical neural structures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of hypofractionated SRS as a therapeutic option for large-sized skull base meningiomas. Thirty-one consecutive patients (median age: 55 years, 9 men and 22 women) who had been treated with hypofractionated SRS using CyberKnife for large-sized skull base meningiomas (> 10 cm3 in volume, median of 18.9 cm3, range 11.6–58.2 cm3) were enrolled. All patients harbored middle or posterior skull base tumors, most frequently of cavernous sinus (n = 7, 22.6%), petroclival (n = 6, 19.4%), or tentorial edge (n = 6, 19.4%) locations. SRS was delivered in five daily fractions (range 3–5 fractions) with a median cumulative dose of 27.8 Gy (range 22.6–27.8 Gy). With a median follow-up of 57 months (range 9–98 months), tumor control was achieved for 28 (90.3%) of 31 patients. Treatment response on MRI included partial response (volume decrease > 20%) in 17 (54.8%) patients, stable in 11 (35.5%), and progression (volume increase > 20%) in 3 (9.7%). Of 21 patients with cranial neuropathy, 20 (95.2%) showed improved neurological status. Our current results suggest a promising role of hypofractionated SRS for large-sized skull base megningiomas in terms of tumor control and neurological outcomes. It is a reasonable therapeutic option for select patients.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) involving the hypothalamic–pituitary axis (H–P axis) is a rare intracranial neoplasm. We aimed to determine the unique characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with PCNSL at the H–P axis and review the literature. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with PCNSL in our institute from 2000 to 2017. We analyzed patient characteristics, clinicopathologic features, imaging results, and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, we searched the PubMed database and gathered more cases from published studies to analyze patient treatment outcomes. A total of 488 patients were diagnosed with central nervous system lymphoma at our institute. Seven (1.4%) patients had H–P axis involvement, five had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and two had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. All patients had anterior pituitary lobe dysfunction, and two had posterior lobe dysfunction. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for seven patients was 29.0 (range: 0.9–48.1) months, and the 3-year survival rate was 42.9%. Pooled analysis included 45 patients. The median PFS for these patients was 7.0 months (0.9–52.0), and the 2-year survival rate was 20%. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the patients with visual field defects had better prognosis (p = 0.0153 and 0.043, respectively). PCNSL at the H–P axis is associated with a higher rate of pituitary dysfunction than other parasellar pathologies. PCNSL at the H–P axis has a worse treatment outcome than PCNSL at other sites. However, visual field defect is related to a favorable prognosis in these patients.

Pituitary metastases (PMs) are uncommon, representing only 1% of pituitary lesions. The diagnosis of PMs can be challenging and an optimal management remains to be determined. Here, we present a pilot clinical study on the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with an optimized dosimetric plan in treating PMs. Between June 2013 and December 2014, seven consecutive patients (4 men and 3 women; median age 62 years) had been diagnosed with PMs based on their characteristic clinical and radiological features and subsequently treated using hypofractionated SRS. Primary cancers originated from the lung (n = 5) or the breast (n = 2). All patients presented with diabetes insipidus (DI). Anterior pituitary and visual dysfunction were combined in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PMs involved the pituitary stalk and/or the posterior lobe in all patients. SRS of a cumulative marginal dose 31 Gy with dose-volume constraints for the optic apparatus was delivered in 5 daily fractions. As results, tumor was locally controlled in all patients with substantial responses on MRI (including complete remission in 4 patients). The median survival time was 14 months (range, 6-24 months) after SRS. DI and visual dysfunction improved in all patients, although anterior pituitary dysfunction did not recover. No patients experienced any deterioration in visual, pituitary, or other cranial nerve functions. These results suggest a promising role of hypofractionated SRS in treating PMs in terms of both tumor control and functional outcomes.

Given recently suggested utility of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating large brain metastases (BMs) > 3 cm, we sought to prospectively control tumor size variable to investigate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated SRS for medium-sized BMs (2.5 to 3 cm) compared with single-fraction SRS. Between 2011 and 2015, a total of 100 patients with newly diagnosed BMs (n = 105) of 2.5 to 3 cm had been treated with either single-fraction (n = 67; median dose 20 Gy) or hypofractionated SRS (n = 38; median cumulative dose 35 Gy in 5 daily fractions). No patients received any prior or upfront whole brain radiotherapy. In each patient, treatment outcome was measured by local tumor control (LTC), overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), and the occurrence of radiation necrosis (RN). With a median follow-up of 14 months, significant differences were observed between the single-fraction versus hypofractionated SRS groups in the incidence of RN (29.9% vs. 5.3%, P

Several studies have reported the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) in the treatment of benign perioptic tumors. This study went further and evaluated the feasibility of hSRS in the treatment of those causing compressive cranial neuropathies (CCNs) among perioptic tumors with special consideration of functional improvement. Twenty-six patients with CCNs (CN II = 19; CN III/IV/VI = 9; CN V = 3) caused by perioptic tumors underwent hSRS between 2011 and 2015. hSRS was delivered in five fractions with a median marginal dose of 27.8 Gy (≈14 Gy in a single fraction, assuming an α/β of three) to a tumor volume of 8.2 ± 8.3 cm3. All tumors except one shrank after treatment, with a mean volume decrease of 35 % (range 4−84 %) during the mean follow-up period of 20 months. In 19 patients (38 eyes) with compressive optic neuropathy, vision improved in 55.3 % of eyes (n = 21), was unchanged in 36.8 % (n = 14), and worsened in 7.9 % (n = 3) (2.6 % after excluding two eyes deteriorated due to transient tumor swelling). A higher conformity index (p = 0.034) and volume of the optic apparatus receiving >23.0 Gy (p = 0.019) were associated with greater tumor shrinkage. A greater decrease in tumor volume (p = 0.035) was associated with a better improvement in vision. Ophthalmoplegia and facial hypesthesia improved in six of nine (66.7 %) and three of three (100 %) patients, respectively. There was no newly developed neurological deficit. Decompressive SRS for benign perioptic tumors causing CCN is feasible using hypofractionation, representing a useful alternative to microsurgical resection.

Central neurocytoma (CN) is a very rare neuronal neoplasm. The clinical implications of the potential prognostic factors for these lesions, including tumor atypia, have therefore not been clarified. Forty CN patients were enrolled and reclassified as typical or atypical in accordance with an MIB-1 labeling index (LI) of above and below 2%. We classified our retrospective study cohort as 21 (52.5%) typical and 19 (47.5%) atypical CN cases. No significant differences were found in terms of sex, mean age, mean tumor size or tumor location between these groups. Recurrences occurred in 2 (9.5%) typical and 6 (33.3%) atypical cases. The typical CN 2-,3- and 5-year PFS rates were 100%, 100%, 92.3%, and those for the atypical group were 93.8%, 78.1%, 65.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The PFS rates did not statistically differ by treatment modality (gross total resection alone, subtotal resection (STR) alone and STR plus radiation therapy (RT) or radiosurgery (RS)) either in the whole cohort (p = 0.75) or in the typical CN and atypical CN subgroups (p = 0.45 and 0.98, respectively). An atypical histology was the only prognostic indicator of recurrence by univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 5.40, p = 0.04). An atypical lesion (MIB-LI > 2%) is an important prognostic indicator in CN. The clinical implications of the extent of resection for CN patients are still debatable. The use of STR plus RT or RS may be a viable treatment strategy for CN but different therapeutic and follow-up approaches for atypical CN will be needed.