1. Rapidly-labelled, acidic phospholipids of the goldfish brain
- Author
-
J. M. Hallenbeck, J. Hollander, and Bernard W. Agranoff
- Subjects
Atropine ,Electrophoresis ,Chromatography, Paper ,Phospholipid ,Cyprinidae ,Stimulation ,Centrifugation ,Phosphatidylinositols ,Biochemistry ,Phosphatidate ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Adenosine Triphosphate ,Labelling ,Borates ,Animals ,Diglyceride ,Inositol phosphate ,Phospholipids ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Brain Chemistry ,Perchlorates ,Brain ,Phosphorus Isotopes ,Phosphatidic acid ,Stimulation, Chemical ,chemistry ,Phospholipases ,Autoradiography ,Secretagogue ,Carbachol ,Chromatography, Thin Layer - Abstract
Homogenates and particulate fractions of goldfish brain incorporated radioac- tivity from y-(B*P)ATP selectively into acidic phospholipids during brief periods of incuba- tion. Phosphatidate and lysophosphatidate became strongly labelled and activity was also found in phosphatidyl inositol phosphate and in phosphatidyl inositol diphosphate. When tetraphenylborate (a K+-complexing agent) was added, a selective stimulation of incorporation of 3*P into phosphatidate occurred. The addition of perchlorate (also known to bind K+) did not produce a similar stimulation, nor did the addition of K+ block the stimulation by tetraphenylborate. The stimulation of the labelling of phospholipids by tetraphenylborate appeared to be the result of multiple actions. Besides the evidence that it acted by stimulating the phosphoinositide phosphodiesterase of brain, data were obtained suggesting that it stimulated diglyceride kinase and blocked endogenous destruction of ATP as well. The stimulation by tetraphenylborate was blocked by addition of atropine but not of arecoline. THE PHOSPHOINOSITIDES, although ubiquitous in animal tissues, frequently exist in trace amounts demonstrable only by tracer methods. The greater content of phos- phoinositides in excitable tissues (FOLCH-PI, 1949; DAWSON and DITTMER, 1961 ; BROCKERHOFF and BALLOU, 1962) and the evidence from labelling experiments of rapid turnover (DAWSON, 1954; HOKIN and HOKIN, 1958; ANSELL and SPANNER, 1959; LEBARON, KISTLER and HAUSER, 1960; HOLZL and WAGNER, 1964; KFOURY and KERR, 1964; SEIFFERT and AGRANOFF, 1965) have suggested an important physio- logical role for these compounds in excitable tissues. Alterations of the labelling of phosphatidyl inositol (PhI) and phosphatidic acid (PhA) have been described in a variety of neural and secretory tissues in response to the appropriate neurohumor or secretagogue (cf. reviews by: HAWTHORNE, 1960; HOKIN and HOKIN, 1960; Cum- BERT, 1967). In sympathetic ganglia increased labelling has been correlated with synaptic transmission (LARRABEE and LEICHT, 1965; LARRABEE, 1968). Recently DURELL, GARLAND and FRIEDEL (1969) have suggested that such alterations are the result of activation of phosphatidyl inositol phosphodiesterase releasing diglyceride and inositol phosphate, but the detailed mechanism of the effect of acetylcholine remains speculative. The present experiments were undertaken to clarify the nature of these alterations in phospholipid labelling. The goldfish was selected because of the current interest in this laboratory in goldfish behaviour and its metabolic conse- quences. Various aspects of the labelling patterns of phospholipids in the goldflsh brain, the effects of acetylcholine in goldfish brain, and the stimulation by tetra- phenylborate of phospholipid labelling comprise the present report.
- Published
- 1970